Rapid Antigen Test LumiraDxTM vs. Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction for the Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Retrospective Cohort Study

被引:14
作者
Cattelan, Anna Maria [1 ]
Sasset, Lolita [1 ]
Zabeo, Federico [2 ]
Ferrari, Anna [1 ]
Rossi, Lucia [3 ]
Mazzitelli, Maria [1 ]
Cocchio, Silvia [2 ]
Baldo, Vincenzo [2 ]
机构
[1] Azienda Osped Univ Padova, Infect & Trop Dis Unit, I-35128 Padua, Italy
[2] Univ Padua, Dept Cardiac Thorac & Vasc Sci & Publ Hlth, I-35127 Padua, Italy
[3] Azienda Osped Univ Padova, Microbiol Dept, I-35128 Padua, Italy
关键词
SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; diagnosis; rapid antigen testing; RT-PCR; agreement; sensitivity; specificity; positive predictive value; negative predictive value; accuracy;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph19073826
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Background: Real time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (real time RT-PCR) testing is the gold standard for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infections. However, to expand the testing capacity, new SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests (Ag-RDTs) have been implemented. Ag-RDTs are more rapid, but less reliable in terms of sensitivity, and real-life data on their performance in comparison with the real time RT-PCR test are lacking. Methods: We aimed at assessing the diagnostic performance of the third-generation antigenic swab LumiraDx (TM) compared with real time RT-PCR in a retrospective cohort study at the Infectious Diseases Unit of Padua. All of the patients who were consecutively tested for SARS-CoV-2 in our centre (by both real time RT-PCR and Ag-RTD LumiraDx(TM)) from 19 January to 30 May 2021, were included. Cycle-threshold (Ct) values of positive real time RT-PCR were recorded as well as the number of days from symptoms' onset to testing. Results: Among the 282 patients included, 80.9% (N = 228) tested positive to real time RT-PCR, and among these, 174 tested positive also to LumiraDx (TM). Compared with real time RT-PCR, which is considered as the gold standard for the assessment of the presence/absence of SARS-CoV-2 infection, LumiraDx (TM) showed an overall sensitivity of 76.3% and specificity of 94.4%. Sensitivity increased to 91% when testing was performed <10 days from symptoms' onset, and to 95% when considering Ct < 25. Multivariable binomial logistic regression showed that false negative LumiraDx (TM) results were significantly associated with high Ct values, and with further testing from symptoms' onset. Conclusions: The results of our study suggested that the LumiraDx (TM) SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay may be appropriate for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection, especially in its early phase when the test largely meets the performance requirements of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC).
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Administration, 2020, UFAD EM US AUTH
[2]  
Alliance W.B., 2020, NEW COVID 19 TESTING
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2021, OPT US RAP ANT DET T
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Antigen-detection in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection Homepage on the internet
[5]   Accuracy of novel antigen rapid diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2: A living systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Brummer, Lukas E. ;
Katzenschlager, Stephan ;
Gaeddert, Mary ;
Erdmann, Christian ;
Schmitz, Stephani ;
Bota, Marc ;
Grilli, Maurizio ;
Larmann, Jan ;
Weigand, Markus A. ;
Pollock, Nira R. ;
Mace, Aurelien ;
Carmona, Sergio ;
Ongarello, Stefano ;
Sacks, Jilian A. ;
Denkinger, Claudia M. .
PLOS MEDICINE, 2021, 18 (08)
[6]   Predicting Infectious Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 From Diagnostic Samples [J].
Bullard, Jared ;
Dust, Kerry ;
Funk, Duane ;
Strong, James E. ;
Alexander, David ;
Garnett, Lauren ;
Boodman, Carl ;
Bello, Alexander ;
Hedley, Adam ;
Schiffman, Zachary ;
Doan, Kaylie ;
Bastien, Nathalie ;
Li, Yan ;
Van Caeseele, Paul G. ;
Poliquin, Guillaume .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2020, 71 (10) :2663-2666
[7]   Urgent need of rapid tests for SARS CoV-2 antigen detection: Evaluation of the SD-Biosensor antigen test for SARS-CoV-2 [J].
Cerutti, Francesco ;
Burdino, Elisa ;
Milia, Maria Grazia ;
Allice, Tiziano ;
Gregori, Gabriella ;
Bruzzone, Bianca ;
Ghisetti, Valeria .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2020, 132
[8]   SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, and MERS-CoV viral load dynamics, duration of viral shedding, and infectiousness: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Cevik, Muge ;
Tate, Matthew ;
Lloyd, Ollie ;
Maraolo, Alberto Enrico ;
Schafers, Jenna ;
Ho, Antonia .
LANCET MICROBE, 2021, 2 (01) :E13-E22
[9]  
He Xi, 2020, Nature Medicine, V26, DOI [10.1038/s41591-020-0869-5, 10.1038/s41591-020-1016-z]
[10]   Asymptomatic Transmission During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic and Implications for Public Health Strategies [J].
Huff, Hanalise, V ;
Singh, Avantika .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2020, 71 (10) :2752-2756