PRODIAG: A process-independent transient diagnostic system - I: Theoretical concepts

被引:12
作者
Reifman, J
Wei, TYC
机构
[1] Argonne Natl Lab, Div Reactor Anal, Argonne, IL 60439 USA
[2] Argonne Natl Lab, Reactor Engn Div, Argonne, IL 60439 USA
关键词
D O I
10.13182/NSE99-A2038
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
A novel first-principles-based diagnostic system called PRODIAG is proposed for on-line detection and identification of faulty components during incipient off-normal process conditions. The concepts of qualitative physics reasoning and function-oriented diagnostics are employed in the design of PRODIAG and result in two unique capabilities not found in other plant-level diagnostic systems. First, PRODIAG is fully portable as it requires only modification of the input files containing the appropriate process schematics information to be able to diagnose single-component failures in different processes/plants. Second, PRODIAG detects unanticipated faults. Hence, it does not require the prespecification and formulation of rules to cover every conceivable fault scenario, and unlike traditional approaches, it is nor likely to misdiagnose unforeseen events. PRODIAG's approach is to map process symptoms Into component faults through a three-step mapping procedure with a knowledge base containing three distinct types of information: qualitative macroscopic balance equation rules, functional classification of process components, and the process piping and instrumentation diagram. The concepts introduced in the proposed diagnostic system are described, and an illustrative example shows how they are used in plant-level diagnostics.
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 347
页数:19
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   NUCLEAR-POWER-PLANT STATUS DIAGNOSTICS USING AN ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK [J].
BARTLETT, EB ;
UHRIG, RE .
NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY, 1992, 97 (03) :272-281
[2]   A QUALITATIVE PHYSICS BASED ON CONFLUENCES [J].
DEKLEER, J ;
BROWN, JS .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1984, 24 (1-3) :7-83
[3]   A personal computer-based on-line signal validation system for nuclear power plants [J].
Erbay, AS ;
Upadhyaya, BR .
NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 119 (01) :63-75
[4]   NARROWING DIAGNOSTIC FOCUS USING FUNCTIONAL DECOMPOSITION [J].
FINCH, FE ;
KRAMER, MA .
AICHE JOURNAL, 1988, 34 (01) :25-36
[5]  
Hashemi S., 1990, Proceedings of the Topical Meeting on Advances in Human Factors Research on Man/Computer Interactions: Nuclear and Beyond, P198
[6]   A SIMULATION-BASED EXPERT SYSTEM FOR NUCLEAR-POWER PLANT DIAGNOSTICS [J].
HASSBERGER, JA ;
LEE, JC .
NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 1989, 102 (02) :153-171
[7]  
HASSBERGER JA, 1988, P TOPL M ART INT OTH, P539
[8]  
KIGUCHI T, 1985, P INT TOPL M COMP AP, P635
[9]  
LAPOINTE PA, 1990, AECL10149 CHALK RIV
[10]   A REAL-TIME EXPERT SYSTEM FOR NUCLEAR-POWER-PLANT FAILURE DIAGNOSIS AND OPERATIONAL GUIDE [J].
NAITO, N ;
SAKUMA, A ;
SHIGENO, K ;
MORI, N .
NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY, 1987, 79 (03) :284-296