THE ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF THE 2013 REFORM ON THE HUNGARIAN AGRICULTURE

被引:1
|
作者
Mizik, Tamas [1 ]
机构
[1] Corvinus Univ, Budapest, Hungary
来源
RESEARCH FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT 2019, VOL 2 | 2019年
关键词
basic payment; degressivity and capping; greening; coupled support; young and small farmers scheme; POLICY;
D O I
10.22616/rrd.25.2019.043
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
The impacts of agricultural policies are decisive on the agricultural sector, especially in the case of the European Union's (EU) Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). The 2013 CAP reform introduced several new measures. In budgetary terms, basic payment and greening were the most significant ones. Besides, coupled supports, young farmer and small farmers scheme should be mentioned. To reveal the changes caused by these measures, the time horizon of the study is 2013-2017. Since the subsidies represent a significant part of the income generated in the agricultural sector, the basic hypothesis of the study is that the production units concerned (individual farms, private enterprises) gave economically rational answers. In practice, this means trying to fully adapt to the changes to maximize support. Based on the analysed datasets (Hungarian Central Statistical Office and Hungarian State Treasury), it became evident that farmers responded rationally: splitting up farms against capping, moving towards the lowest resistance to comply with greening, plus associating them with the extra support of coupled payments. Generational renewal is a key issue; however, the present form of young farmers scheme needs to be refined to be more effective. Small farmers scheme is a good opportunity for farmers with less than 5.5 ha and most of the concerned farmers chose well. However, there are about 6,000 farms that are too small for the standard system, while 772 farms that are too large for the small farmers scheme.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 20
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Impact of economic globalisation on agriculture in developing countries: A review
    Nugroho, Agus Dwi
    Lakner, Zoltan
    AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS-ZEMEDELSKA EKONOMIKA, 2022, 68 (05): : 180 - 188
  • [32] Impacts of energy subsidy reform on the Malaysian economy and transportation sector
    Solaymani, Saeed
    Kari, Fatimah
    ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 70 : 115 - 125
  • [33] Stealth Economy? Economic Theory and the Politics of Administrative Reform
    Pierre, Jon
    ADMINISTRATION & SOCIETY, 2011, 43 (06) : 672 - 692
  • [34] Entrepreneurial ecosystems: economic, technological, and societal impacts
    Audretsch, David B.
    Cunningham, James A.
    Kuratko, Donald F.
    Lehmann, Erik E.
    Menter, Matthias
    JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2019, 44 (02) : 313 - 325
  • [35] THE MESODOMAIN OF WELFARE REFORM: RENEGOTIATING THE ORDER OF ECONOMIC INEQUALITY
    Covaleski, Mark A.
    Dirsmith, Mark W.
    Weiss, Jane
    STUDIES IN SYMBOLIC INTERACTION, 2012, 39 : 3 - 49
  • [36] Economic Impacts of Renewable Energy Promotion in Germany
    Boehringer, Christoph
    Landis, Florian
    Reanos, Miguel Angel Tovar
    ENERGY JOURNAL, 2017, 38 : 189 - 209
  • [37] Political, economic and environmental impacts of biofuels: A review
    Demirbas, Ayhan
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2009, 86 : S108 - S117
  • [38] Assessing the local economic impacts of land protection
    Sims, Katharine R. E.
    Thompson, Jonathan R.
    Meyer, Spencer R.
    Nolte, Christoph
    Plisinski, Joshua S.
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2019, 33 (05) : 1035 - 1044
  • [39] The European Economic and Monetary Union and Labour Market Reform
    Bednarek-Sekunda, Elzbieta
    Jong-A-Pin, Richard
    de Haan, Jakob
    EUROPEAN UNION POLITICS, 2010, 11 (01) : 3 - 27
  • [40] Economic Impacts Analysis of ShaleGas Investment in China
    Han, Shangfeng
    Zhang, Baosheng
    Wang, Xuecheng
    5TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATERIAL SCIENCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING (MSEE2017), 2018, 301