Radiative forcing of climate change from the Copernicus reanalysis of atmospheric composition

被引:33
|
作者
Bellouin, Nicolas [1 ]
Davies, Will [1 ]
Shine, Keith P. [1 ]
Quaas, Johannes [2 ]
Muelmenstaedt, Johannes [2 ,8 ]
Forster, Piers M. [3 ]
Smith, Chris [3 ]
Lee, Lindsay [4 ,9 ]
Regayre, Leighton [4 ]
Brasseur, Guy [5 ]
Sudarchikova, Natalia [5 ]
Bouarar, Idir [5 ]
Boucher, Olivier [6 ]
Myhre, Gunnar [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Reading, Dept Meteorol, Reading RG6 6BB, Berks, England
[2] Univ Leipzig, Inst Meteorol, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
[3] Univ Leeds, Priestley Int Ctr Climate, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[4] Univ Leeds, Inst Climate & Atmospher Sci, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[5] Max Planck Inst Meteorol, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany
[6] Sorbonne Univ, CNRS, Inst Pierre Simon Lapl, F-75252 Paris, France
[7] Ctr Int Climate & Environm Res Oslo CICERO, N-0318 Oslo, Norway
[8] Pacific Northwest Natl Lab, Atmospher Sci & Global Change Div, Richland, WA 99352 USA
[9] Sheffield Hallam Univ, Dept Engn & Math, Sheffield S1 1WB, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
TROPOSPHERIC OZONE; OPTICAL-PROPERTIES; DATA ASSIMILATION; AEROSOL INFLUENCE; MODEL; UNCERTAINTY; EMISSIONS; SYSTEM; CARBON; ATTRIBUTION;
D O I
10.5194/essd-12-1649-2020
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Radiative forcing provides an important basis for understanding and predicting global climate changes, but its quantification has historically been done independently for different forcing agents, has involved observations to varying degrees, and studies have not always included a detailed analysis of uncertainties. The Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service reanalysis is an optimal combination of modelling and observations of atmospheric composition. It provides a unique opportunity to rely on observations to quantify the monthly and spatially resolved global distributions of radiative forcing consistently for six of the largest forcing agents: carbon dioxide, methane, tropospheric ozone, stratospheric ozone, aerosol-radiation interactions, and aerosolcloud interactions. These radiative-forcing estimates account for adjustments in stratospheric temperatures but do not account for rapid adjustments in the troposphere. On a global average and over the period 2003-2017, stratospherically adjusted radiative forcing of carbon dioxide has averaged +1.89 W m(-2) (5 %-95% confidence interval: 1.50 to 2.29 W m(-2)) relative to 1750 and increased at a rate of 18% per decade. The corresponding values for methane are +0.46 (0.36 to 0.56) W m(-2) and 4% per decade but with a clear acceleration since 2007. Ozone radiative-forcing averages +0.32 (0 to 0.64) W m(-2), almost entirely contributed by tropospheric ozone since stratospheric ozone radiative forcing is only +0.003W m(-2). Aerosol radiative-forcing averages 1.25 (1.98 to 0.52) W m(-2), with aerosol-radiation interactions contributing 0.56 W m(-2) and aerosolcloud interactions contributing 0.69 W m(-2) to the global average. Both have been relatively stable since 2003. Taking the six forcing agents together, there is no indication of a sustained slowdown or acceleration in the rate of increase in anthropogenic radiative forcing over the period. These ongoing radiative-forcing estimates will monitor the impact on the Earth's energy budget of the dramatic emission reductions towards net-zero that are needed to limit surface temperature warming to the Paris Agreement temperature targets. Indeed, such impacts should be clearly manifested in radiative forcing before being clear in the temperature record. In addition, this radiative-forcing dataset can provide the input distributions needed by researchers involved in monitoring of climate change, detection and attribution, interannual to decadal prediction, and integrated assessment modelling. The data generated by this work are available at https://doi.org/10.24380/ads.1hj3y896 (Bellouin et al., 2020b).
引用
收藏
页码:1649 / 1677
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Surface winds from atmospheric reanalysis lead to contrasting oceanic forcing and coastal upwelling patterns
    Taboada, Fernando G.
    Stock, Charles A.
    Griffies, Stephen M.
    Dunne, John
    John, Jasmin G.
    Small, R. Justin
    Tsujino, Hiroyuki
    OCEAN MODELLING, 2019, 133 : 79 - 111
  • [22] Accounting for radiative forcing from albedo change in future global land-use scenarios
    Jones, Andrew D.
    Calvin, Katherine V.
    Collins, William D.
    Edmonds, James
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2015, 131 (04) : 691 - 703
  • [23] Volcanic Radiative Forcing From 1979 to 2015
    Schmidt, Anja
    Mills, Michael J.
    Ghan, Steven
    Gregory, Jonathan M.
    Allan, Richard P.
    Andrews, Timothy
    Bardeen, Charles G.
    Conley, Andrew
    Forster, Piers M.
    Gettelman, Andrew
    Portmann, Robert W.
    Solomon, Susan
    Toon, Owen B.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2018, 123 (22) : 12491 - 12508
  • [24] Spatial scales of climate response to inhomogeneous radiative forcing
    Shindell, Drew
    Schulz, Michael
    Ming, Yi
    Takemura, Toshihiko
    Faluvegi, Greg
    Ramaswamy, V.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2010, 115
  • [25] The Dependence of Climate Sensitivity on the Meridional Distribution of Radiative Forcing
    Zhang, Bosong
    Zhao, Ming
    He, Haozhe
    Soden, Brian J.
    Tan, Zhihong
    Xiang, Baoqiang
    Wang, Chenggong
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2023, 50 (18)
  • [26] The radiative impact of water ice clouds from a reanalysis of Mars Climate Sounder data
    Steele, L. J.
    Lewis, S. R.
    Patel, M. R.
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2014, 41 (13) : 4471 - 4478
  • [27] An influence of solar spectral variations on radiative forcing of climate
    Haigh, Joanna D.
    Winning, Ann R.
    Toumi, Ralf
    Harder, Jerald W.
    NATURE, 2010, 467 (7316) : 696 - 699
  • [28] Radiative forcing in the ACCMIP historical and future climate simulations
    Shindell, D. T.
    Lamarque, J. -F.
    Schulz, M.
    Flanner, M.
    Jiao, C.
    Chin, M.
    Young, P. J.
    Lee, Y. H.
    Rotstayn, L.
    Mahowald, N.
    Milly, G.
    Faluvegi, G.
    Balkanski, Y.
    Collins, W. J.
    Conley, A. J.
    Dalsoren, S.
    Easter, R.
    Ghan, S.
    Horowitz, L.
    Liu, X.
    Myhre, G.
    Nagashima, T.
    Naik, V.
    Rumbold, S. T.
    Skeie, R.
    Sudo, K.
    Szopa, S.
    Takemura, T.
    Voulgarakis, A.
    Yoon, J. -H.
    Lo, F.
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2013, 13 (06) : 2939 - 2974
  • [29] A modeling study of effective radiative forcing and climate response due to tropospheric ozone
    Xie, Bing
    Zhang, Hua
    Wang, Zhili
    Zhao, Shuyun
    Fu, Qiang
    ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 2016, 33 (07) : 819 - 828
  • [30] Prediction of Surface Flow by Forcing of Climate Forecast System Reanalysis Data
    Jajarmizadeh, Milad
    Sidek, Lariyah Mohd
    Mirzai, Majid
    Alaghmand, Sina
    Harun, Sobri
    Majid, Mohammad Rafee
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2016, 30 (08) : 2627 - 2640