Nonpharmacological interventions for cancer-related cognitive impairment in adult cancer patients: A network meta-analysis

被引:45
|
作者
Zeng, Yingchun [1 ]
Dong, Juntao [2 ]
Huang, Meiling [1 ]
Zhang, Jun-e [3 ]
Zhang, Xiaoming [4 ]
Xie, Man [5 ]
Wefel, Jeffrey S. [6 ]
机构
[1] Guangzhou Med Univ, Dept Nursing, Affiliated Hosp 3, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 3, Dept Rehabil Med, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Nursing, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Southern Med Univ, Peoples Hosp Baoan Shenzhen, Affiliated Baoan Hosp, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[5] Jieyang Peoples Hosp, Jieyang, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[6] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Neurooncol & Radiat Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
Network meta-analysis; Cancer-related cognitive impairment; Adult cancer patients; Nonpharmacological interventions; BREAST-CANCER; BEHAVIORAL THERAPY; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; SURVIVORS; REHABILITATION; CHEMOTHERAPY; MANAGEMENT; EFFICACY; MEMORY; SPEED;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103514
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: Conventional meta-analyses can only provide direct comparison evidence, and the best options of nonpharmacological interventions for cancer-related cognitive impairment remain largely unknown. Objectives: To evaluate the comparative effects of all known nonpharmacological interventions for cancer-related cognitive impairment, and to rank the best intervention options for adult non- central nervous system cancer patients with cancer-related cognitive impairment. Design: Systematic review with a new analytic approach of network meta-analysis. Data sources: Six electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials from January 2010 to July 2019. Review methods: Literature screening, data extraction and quality appraisal was undertaken systematically by two independent reviewers. Quantitative network meta-analysis performed to analyze key study outcomes. The primary outcome was the effectiveness of interventions on subjective cognitive function, and the secondary outcome was the safety of nonpharmacological interventions for cancer-related cognitive impairment. Results: There were 29 eligible randomized controlled trials searched, and a total of 10 interventions identified. All 29 randomized controlled trials that were included had no reported significant adverse events, therefore, these 10 nonpharmacological interventions are safe for cancer-related cognitive impairment management. In terms of effectiveness, the pooled overall effects were in favor of these 10 nonpharmacological interventions. The most effective interventions included meditation, cognitive training, cognitive rehabilitation, and exercise interventions, with a mean difference of effective size plus 95% confidence interval 10.26 (1.53, 19.00), 5.02 (1.41, 8.63), 4.88 (0.65, 9.11), and 3.82 (0.52, 7.13), respectively. Other treatment effects did not show statistically significant differences. Conclusions: This network meta-analysis found that meditation interventions, cognitive training, cognitive rehabilitation, and exercise were the most effective interventions for adult non-central nervous system cancer patients to manage cancer-related cognitive impairment. Results of this network meta-analysis contribute evidence-based data to inform medical decision-making. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Interventions for alleviating cancer-related dyspnea: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ben-Aharon, Irit
    Gafter-Gvili, Anat
    Leibovici, Leonard
    Stemmer, Salomon M.
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2012, 51 (08) : 996 - 1008
  • [32] Prevalence and assessment tools of cancer-related cognitive impairment in lung cancer survivors: a systematic review and proportional meta-analysis
    Ho, Mu-Hsing
    So, Tsz Wei
    Fan, Chun Lun
    Chung, Yiu Tak
    Lin, Chia-Chin
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2024, 32 (04)
  • [33] Prevalence and assessment tools of cancer-related cognitive impairment in lung cancer survivors: a systematic review and proportional meta-analysis
    Mu-Hsing Ho
    Tsz Wei So
    Chun Lun Fan
    Yiu Tak Chung
    Chia-Chin Lin
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2024, 32
  • [34] Effects of sleep interventions on cancer-related fatigue and quality of life in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu Dun
    Wu Xian-Yi
    Huang Si-Ting
    Yu Xin-Yuan
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2022, 30 (04) : 3043 - 3055
  • [35] Effects of sleep interventions on cancer-related fatigue and quality of life in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu Dun
    Wu Xian-Yi
    Huang Si-Ting
    Yu Xin-Yuan
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022, 30 : 3043 - 3055
  • [36] Non-pharmacological interventions for cancer-related fatigue in terminal cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hosokawa, Mai
    Ito, Masami
    Kyota, Ayumi
    Hirai, Kazue
    Yamakawa, Miyae
    Miyashita, Mitsunori
    ANNALS OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (11) : 3382 - +
  • [37] Interventions to Address Cancer-Related Cognitive Impairment (2018-2022)
    Campbell, Claudine
    Polo, Katie M.
    Fleischer, Anne
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2023, 77
  • [38] A narrative review of risk factors and interventions for cancer-related cognitive impairment
    Bai, Lu
    Yu, Enyan
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2021, 9 (01)
  • [39] Conservative Intervention Strategies for Adult Cancer-Related Lymphedema: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
    Lytvyn, Lyubov
    Zeraatkar, Dena
    Anbari, Allison B.
    Ginex, Pamela K.
    Zoratti, Michael J.
    Niburski, Kacper
    Sadeghirad, Behnam
    Siedler, Madelin
    Thabane, Lehana
    Morgan, Rebecca L.
    ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2020, 47 (05) : E171 - E189
  • [40] Cannabinoids for adult cancer-related pain: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Boland, Elaine G.
    Bennett, Michael, I
    Allgar, Victoria
    Boland, Jason W.
    BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE, 2020, 10 (01) : 14 - 24