Crime rates and expected sanctions: The economics of deterrence revisited

被引:38
作者
Bar-Gill, O [1 ]
Harel, A
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Univ, Eitan Berglas Sch Econ, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Law, John M Olin Ctr Law Econ & Business, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Fac Law, IL-91905 Jerusalem, Israel
关键词
D O I
10.1086/322055
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
A higher expected sanction lowers the crime rate. This intuitive cornerstone of deterrence theory has garnered extensive theoretical and empirical research. The present study focuses on the opposite effects-the effects of the crime rate on the expected sanction. It turns out that these effects are versatile and rich in both the direction and the magnitude of their influence on the expected sanction. After analyzing these countereffects of the crime rate on the expected sanction, we present a new model of deterrence that explicitly incorporates the crime rate as one of the determinants of the expected sanction. The adjusted model is then used to study the effects of the crime rate on deterrence and on optimal law enforcement policy.
引用
收藏
页码:485 / 501
页数:17
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   HOW CORRUPTION MAY CORRUPT [J].
ANDVIG, JC ;
MOENE, KO .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 1990, 13 (01) :63-76
[2]  
[Anonymous], MARK CAIN STIGMA THE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1992, INT REV LAW ECON
[4]  
ASHWORTH A, 1995, SENTENCING CRIMINAL, P89
[5]  
BARGILL O, 2000, 14200 TEL AV U SCH E
[6]   OPTIMAL SANCTIONS WHEN INDIVIDUALS ARE IMPERFECTLY INFORMED ABOUT THE PROBABILITY OF APPREHENSION [J].
BEBCHUK, LA ;
KAPLOW, L .
JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES, 1992, 21 (02) :365-370
[7]   CRIME AND PUNISHMENT - ECONOMIC APPROACH [J].
BECKER, GS .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1968, 76 (02) :169-217
[8]  
BENTHAM J, 1789, INTRO PRINCIPLES MOR, pCHR12
[9]   Psychological expected utility theory and anticipatory feelings [J].
Caplin, A ;
Leahy, J .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2001, 116 (01) :55-79
[10]  
CARRHILL RA, 1979, CRIME POLICE CRIMINA, P61