Effects of substrate characteristics on bone cell response to the mechanical environment

被引:20
|
作者
Yang, Y
Magnay, J
Cooling, L
Cooper, JJ
El Haj, AJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Keele Univ, N Staffordshire Hosp, Ctr Sci & Technol Med, Sch Med, Stoke On Trent, Staffs, England
[2] Biocomposites, Stoke On Trent, Staffs, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
substrate; bone cells; adhesion; mechanical loading; matrix production;
D O I
10.1007/BF02351007
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The effect of substrate characteristics on primary human bone cell response to mechanical loading was investigated in this study. The substrates comprised organic and inorganic materials with a range of hydrophilic and hydrophobic features. Substrate surface topography varied from smooth to particulate to porous. It was found that hydrophilic substrates such as borosilicate glass facilitated bone cell adhesion, in contrast to hydrophobic substrates such as poly(L-lactic acid), in which clumps of cells grew unevenly across the substrate surface. All primary bone cells cultured in the various collagen-coated substrates were responsive to mechanical stimulation. The study showed that, at a low strain level of 1000 mustrain, mechanical stimulation enhanced bone cell differentiation rather than proliferation. Coating the substrates with collagen type I enhanced cell adhesion and promoted an elongated cell morphology, indicating that the presence of specific binding sites on a substrate may be more important than its hydrophilic properties, regardless of the substrate topography.
引用
收藏
页码:22 / 29
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of substrate characteristics on bone cell response to the mechanical environment
    Y. Yang
    J. Magnay
    L. Cooling
    J. J. Cooper
    A. J. El Haj
    Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, 2004, 42 : 22 - 29
  • [2] Bone Cell Response to Neurotransmitters and Mechanical Loading
    Kwag, J. H.
    Kim, B. G.
    Lee, H. G.
    Kim, C. H.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2008, 23 : S137 - S137
  • [3] Probing cell structure by controlling the mechanical environment with cell-substrate interactions
    Cheng, Chao-Min
    Steward, Robert L., Jr.
    LeDuc, Philip R.
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2009, 42 (02) : 187 - 192
  • [4] TECHNIQUE FOR INVESTIGATING RESPONSE OF BONE TO CHANGES IN ITS MECHANICAL ENVIRONMENT
    GOODSHIP, AE
    LANYON, LE
    NICOPOULOS, A
    OCONNOR, JA
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1978, 277 (APR): : P39 - P39
  • [5] Valvular Endothelial Cell Response to the Mechanical Environment—A Review
    Nandini Deb
    Carla M. R. Lacerda
    Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics, 2021, 79 : 695 - 709
  • [6] Cell Mechanosensing Response of Living Cells to Their Mechanical Environment
    De, Rumi
    RESONANCE-JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2019, 24 (03): : 289 - 296
  • [7] Calcium response in bone cell network to mechanical stimulations
    Huo, Bo
    Lu, X. Lux
    Baik, Andrew
    Costa, Kevin
    Xu, Qiaobing
    Whitesides, Georae
    Guo, X. Edward
    BONE, 2008, 43 : S37 - S37
  • [8] Chemical structure effects on bone response to mechanical loading
    Zhu, Peizhi
    Xu, Jiadi
    Morris, Michael
    Kohn, David
    Ramamoorthy, Ayyalusamy
    BONE, 2010, 47 : S390 - S390
  • [9] Cellular architecture effects on the mechanical response of cancellous bone
    Halgrin, Julien
    Chaari, Fahmi
    Markiewicz, Eric
    Drazetic, Pascal
    MECANIQUE & INDUSTRIES, 2010, 11 (3-4): : 203 - 208
  • [10] Chemical Structure Effects on Bone Response to Mechanical Loading
    Zhu, Peizhi
    Xu, Jiadi
    Morris, Michael D.
    Sahar, Nadder
    Kohn, David H.
    Ramamoorthy, Ayyalusamy
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 96 (03) : 409A - 409A