Magnetic resonance imaging on disease reclassification among active surveillance candidates with low-risk prostate cancer: a diagnostic meta-analysis

被引:48
作者
Guo, R.
Cai, L.
Fan, Y.
Jin, J.
Zhou, L.
Zhang, K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Hosp 1, Dept Urol, Beijing 100034, Peoples R China
关键词
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; ENDORECTAL MR; TEST ACCURACY; BIOPSY; MEN; INTERVENTION; PERFORMANCE; TUMOR; STAGE; SIZE;
D O I
10.1038/pcan.2015.20
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Active surveillance (AS) is an increasingly important attempt to avoid overtreatment of patients who harbor clinically insignificant disease while offering curative treatment to those in whom disease is reclassified as higher risk after an observation period and repeat biopsy. We aim to evaluate the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in predicting upgrading on confirmatory biopsy in men with low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) on AS. METHODS: We searched the PubMed for pertinent studies up to November 2014. We used standard methods recommended for meta-analyses of diagnostic test evaluations. The analysis was based on a summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve. Meta-regression analysis was used to assess the effects of some confounding factors on the results of the meta-analysis. The potential presence of publication bias was tested using the Deeks' funnel plots. RESULTS: Seven studies provided the diagnostic data on MRI and AS of PCa, comprising 1028 patients. The pooled estimates of MRI on disease reclassification among AS candidates were as follows: sensitivity, 0.69 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.44-0.86); specificity, 0.78 (95% CI, 0.53-0.91); positive likelihood ratio, 3.1 (95% CI, 1.6-6.0); negative likelihood ratio, 0.40 (95% CI, 0.23-0.70); and diagnostic odds ratio, 8 (95% CI, 4-16). The P-value for heterogeneity was < 0.001. We found that the SROC curve is positioned toward the desirable upper left corner of the curve, and the area under the curve was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.76-0.83). For a pretest probability of 0.20, the corresponding positive predictive value (PPV) was 0.44 and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 0.91. MRI may reveal an unrecognized significant lesion in 33.27% of patients, and biopsy of these areas reclassified 14.59% of cases as no longer fulfilling the criteria for AS. In addition, when no suspicious disease progression (66.34%) was identified on MRI, the chance of reclassification on repeat biopsy was extremely low at 6.13%. CONCLUSIONS: MRI, especially multiparametric (MP)-MRI, has a moderate diagnostic accuracy as a significant predictor of disease reclassification among AS candidates. The high NPV and specificity for the prediction of biopsy reclassification upon clinical follow-up suggest that negative prostate MRI findings may support a patient remaining under AS. Although the PPV and sensitivity for the prediction were relatively low, the presence of a suspicious lesion > 10 mm lesion may suggest an increased risk for disease progression.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 228
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Characterization of Prostate Lesions in the Active Surveillance Population: Incremental Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prediction of Disease Reclassification [J].
Bonekamp, David ;
Bonekamp, Susanne ;
Mullins, Jeffrey K. ;
Epstein, Jonathan I. ;
Carter, H. Ballentine ;
Macura, Katarzyna J. .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2013, 37 (06) :948-956
[2]   Prostate cancer: Is inapparent tumor at endorectal MR and MR spectroscopic imaging a favorable prognostic finding in patients who select active surveillance? [J].
Cabrera, Alvin R. ;
Coakley, Fergus V. ;
Westphalen, Antonio C. ;
Lu, Ying ;
Zhao, Shoujun ;
Shinohara, Katsuto ;
Carroll, Peter R. ;
Kurhanewicz, John .
RADIOLOGY, 2008, 247 (02) :444-450
[3]   A Prospective Comparison of MRI-US Fused Targeted Biopsy Versus Systematic Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Patients on Active Surveillance [J].
Da Rosa, Michael R. ;
Milot, Laurent ;
Sugar, Linda ;
Vesprini, Danny ;
Chung, Hans ;
Loblaw, Andrew ;
Pond, Gregory R. ;
Klotz, Laurence ;
Haider, Masoom A. .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2015, 41 (01) :220-225
[4]   Systematic reviews in health care - Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening [J].
Deeks, JJ .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 323 (7305) :157-162
[5]   The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed [J].
Deeks, JJ ;
Macaskill, P ;
Irwig, L .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 58 (09) :882-893
[6]   Multiparametric MRI is helpful to predict tumor focality, stage, and size in patients diagnosed with unilateral low-risk prostate cancer [J].
Delongchamps, N. B. ;
Beuvon, F. ;
Eiss, D. ;
Flam, T. ;
Muradyan, N. ;
Zerbib, M. ;
Peyromaure, M. ;
Cornud, F. .
PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2011, 14 (03) :232-237
[7]   Evidence-based Radiology: Step 3-Diagnostic Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (Critical Appraisal) [J].
Dwamena, Ben A. .
SEMINARS IN ROENTGENOLOGY, 2009, 44 (03) :170-179
[8]   Prostate Cancer Managed with Active Surveillance: Role of Anatomic MR Imaging and MR Spectroscopic Imaging [J].
Fradet, Vincent ;
Kurhanewicz, John ;
Cowan, Janet E. ;
Karl, Alexander ;
Coakley, Fergus V. ;
Shinohara, Katsuto ;
Carroll, Peter R. .
RADIOLOGY, 2010, 256 (01) :176-183
[9]   Serial Prostate Biopsies are Associated With an Increased Risk of Erectile Dysfunction in Men With Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance [J].
Fujita, Kazutoshi ;
Landis, Patricia ;
McNeil, Brian K. ;
Pavlovich, Christian P. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 182 (06) :2664-2669
[10]   The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance [J].
Glas, AS ;
Lijmer, JG ;
Prins, MH ;
Bonsel, GJ ;
Bossuyt, PMM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 56 (11) :1129-1135