The use of phase in the detection of auditory steady-state responses

被引:69
作者
Picton, TW [1 ]
Dimitrijevic, A [1 ]
John, MS [1 ]
Van Roon, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Baycrest Ctr Geriatr Care, Rotman Res Inst, Toronto, ON M6A 2E1, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
signal detection; phase-weighting; weighted averaging; steady-state responses; frequency analysis; objective audiometry;
D O I
10.1016/S1388-2457(01)00608-3
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective. To investigate how phase measurements might facilitate the detection of auditory steady-state responses. Methods: Multiple steady-state responses were evoked by auditory stimuli modulated at rates between 78 and 95 Hz and with intensities between 50 and 0 dB SPL. The responses were evaluated in 20 subjects after 1, 2, 4, and 6 min. The responses were analyzed in the frequency domain using 4 different detection protocols: (1) phase-coherence, (2) phase-weighted coherence, (3) F test for hidden periodicity, and (4) phase-weighted t test. The phase-weighted measurements were either based on the mean phase of a group of normal subjects or derived for each subject from the phase of the response at higher intensities. Results: Detection protocols based on both phase and amplitude (F test and phase-weighted t test) were more effective than those based on phase alone (phase coherence and phase-weighted coherence) although the difference was small. Protocols using phase-weighting were more. effective than those without phase-weighting. The lowest thresholds for the steady-state responses were obtained using, the phase-weighted t test. Conclusion: Threshold detection can be improved by weighting the detection protocols toward an expected phase, provided that the expected phase can be reliably predicted. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1698 / 1711
页数:14
相关论文
共 48 条
[21]   AUDITORY STEADY-STATE RESPONSES TO MULTIPLE SIMULTANEOUS STIMULI [J].
LINS, OG ;
PICTON, TW .
EVOKED POTENTIALS-ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1995, 96 (05) :420-432
[22]  
LUTKENHONER B, 1991, ACTA OTO-LARYNGOL, P52
[23]   POSSIBILITIES AND LIMITATIONS OF WEIGHTED AVERAGING [J].
LUTKENHONER, B ;
HOKE, M ;
PANTEV, C .
BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS, 1985, 52 (06) :409-416
[24]   NOTE ON THE SAMPLING ERROR OF THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CORRELATED PROPORTIONS OR PERCENTAGES [J].
McNemar, Quinn .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1947, 12 (02) :153-157
[25]  
PEREZABALO MC, 2001, IN PRESS EAR HEAR
[26]  
Picton T W, 1998, J Am Acad Audiol, V9, P315
[27]   RELIABILITY ESTIMATES FOR STEADY-STATE EVOKED-POTENTIALS [J].
PICTON, TW ;
VAJSAR, J ;
RODRIGUEZ, R ;
CAMPBELL, KB .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1987, 68 (02) :119-131
[28]   THE AUTOMATED PREDICTION OF HEARING THRESHOLDS IN SLEEPING SUBJECTS USING AUDITORY STEADY-STATE EVOKED-POTENTIALS [J].
RANCE, G ;
RICKARDS, FW ;
COHEN, LT ;
DEVIDI, S ;
CLARK, GM .
EAR AND HEARING, 1995, 16 (05) :499-507
[29]  
RAYLEIGH, 1880, PHILOS MAG, V10, P73
[30]   STEADY-STATE EVOKED-RESPONSES TO SINUSOIDALLY AMPLITUDE-MODULATED SOUNDS RECORDED IN MAN [J].
REES, A ;
GREEN, GGR ;
KAY, RH .
HEARING RESEARCH, 1986, 23 (02) :123-133