Management Control, Results-Oriented Culture and Public Sector Performance: Empirical Evidence on New Public Management

被引:110
作者
Verbeeten, Frank H. M. [1 ,2 ]
Spekle, Roland F. [3 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, EMFC ARCA Programmes, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Sch Econ, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Nyenrode Business Univ, Management Accounting & Control, Breukelen, Netherlands
关键词
agency theory; civil society; corporate governance; nonprofit organizations; organizational control; structural equation modelling; COMMON METHOD VARIANCE; ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE; INCENTIVES; SYSTEMS; GOVERNMENT; ECONOMICS; MATTERS; DESIGN; PLS;
D O I
10.1177/0170840615580014
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
New Public Management (NPM) has been guiding public sector reform for over 25 years. Its position on the design of effective management control rests on three key ideas: (1) performance improvement requires a results-oriented culture that emphasizes outcomes rather than inputs or processes; (2) public sector organizations need to introduce performance management based on targets, monitoring and incentives; and (3) public sector organizations should decentralize decision rights and reduce their reliance on rules and procedures. Focusing on the particularly influential version of NPM as advocated by the OECD, we examine the validity of these ideas theoretically and empirically. We conclude that NPM's reform programme should be reconsidered. Although the evidence indicates that a results-oriented culture is positively associated with performance, we find little support for the assumed benefits of NPM-type performance contracting. In addition, the results suggest that both the effects of decentralization and the reliance on rules and procedures are opposite to NPM's expectations.
引用
收藏
页码:953 / 978
页数:26
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]   Determinants of control system design in divisionalized firms [J].
Abernethy, MA ;
Bouwens, J ;
van Lent, L .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2004, 79 (03) :545-570
[2]   Power, organization design and managerial behaviour [J].
Abernethy, MA ;
Vagnoni, E .
ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETY, 2004, 29 (3-4) :207-225
[3]   Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive [J].
Adler, PS ;
Borys, B .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1996, 41 (01) :61-89
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1980, MEASURING ASSESSING
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2005, USING PERFORMANCE IN
[6]   Bringing Public Organization and Organizing Back In [J].
Arellano-Gault, David ;
Demortain, David ;
Rouillard, Christian ;
Thoenig, Jean-Claude .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2013, 34 (02) :145-167
[7]   Transparency Reforms in the Public Sector: Beyond the New Economics of Organization [J].
Arellano-Gault, David ;
Lepore, Walter .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2011, 32 (08) :1029-1050
[8]   Forms of Intervention in Public Sector Organizations: Generic Traits in Public Sector Reforms [J].
Bejerot, Eva ;
Hasselbladh, Hans .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2013, 34 (09) :1357-1380
[9]   What's measured is what matters: Targets and gaming in the English public health care system [J].
Bevan, Gwyn ;
Hood, Christopher .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2006, 84 (03) :517-538
[10]   Constructing organizations: The example of public sector reform [J].
Brunsson, N ;
Sahlin-Andersson, K .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2000, 21 (04) :721-746