Systematic literature review on the benefit of patient protection shielding during medical X-ray imaging: Towards a discontinuation of the current practice

被引:19
作者
Samara, Eleni Theano [1 ]
Saltybaeva, Natalia [1 ]
Merce, Marta Sans [2 ]
Gianolini, Stefano [3 ]
Ith, Michael [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Univ Hosp Zurich, Radiat Protect Unit, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Geneva, Dept Radiol & Med Informat, Geneva, Switzerland
[3] Hirslanden AG, Glattpark, Switzerland
[4] Univ Bern, Bern Univ Hosp, Dept Diagnost Intervent & Pediat Radiol DIPR, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
来源
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2022年 / 94卷
关键词
Radiation protection; Patient shielding; X-ray imaging; Radiology; RADIATION-DOSE REDUCTION; TUBE CURRENT MODULATION; CORONARY CT ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; BREAST; LEAD; ORGAN; QUALITY; RADIOGRAPHY; EXPOSURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.12.016
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Patient shielding during medical X-ray imaging has been increasingly criticized in the last years due to growing evidence that it often provides minimal benefit and may even compromise image quality. In Europe, and as also shown in a short assessment in Switzerland, the use of patient shielding is inhomogeneous. The aim of this study was to systematically review recent literature in order to assess benefits and appraise disadvantages related to the routine use of patient shielding. Methods: To evaluate benefits and disadvantages related to the application of patient shielding in radiological procedures, a systematic literature review was performed for CT, radiography, mammography and fluoroscopyguided medical X-ray imaging. In addition, reports from medical physics societies and authorities of different countries were considered in the evaluation. Results: The literature review revealed 479 papers and reports on the topic, from which 87 qualified for closer analysis. The review considered in- and out-of-plane patient shielding as well as shielding for pregnant and pediatric patients. Dose savings and other dose and non-dose related effects of patient shielding were considered in the evaluation. Conclusions: Although patient shielding has been used in radiological practice for many years, its use is no longer undisputed. The evaluation of the systematic literature review of recent studies and reports shows that dose savings are rather minimal while significant dose- and non-dose-related detrimental effects are present. Consequently, the routine usage of patient protection shielding in medical X-ray imaging can be safely discontinued for all modalities and patient groups.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 109
页数:8
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]  
AAPM, 2017, AAPM POSITION STATEM
[2]  
AAPM, 2019, AAPM POSITION STATEM, P32
[3]   Direct Quantification of Breast Dose During Coronary CT Angiography and Evaluation of Dose Reduction Strategies [J].
Abadi, Sobhi ;
Mehrez, Hatem ;
Ursani, Ali ;
Parker, Mark ;
Paul, Narinder .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2011, 196 (02) :W152-W158
[4]  
Abuzaid MM., 2017, IMAGING MED, V9, P45
[5]  
ACR, 2012, BREAST IM STAT RAD R
[6]  
Affairs FDoH, 2017, RAD PROT ORD RPO
[7]   Impact of Contralateral Breast Shielding on the Risk of Developing Radiation-induced Cancer from Full-field Digital Mammography Screening [J].
Ali, Raed M. K. M. ;
England, Andrew ;
Mercer, Claire E. ;
Tootell, Andrew K. ;
Hogg, Peter .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION SCIENCES, 2019, 50 (02) :331-336
[8]   Assessment of breast absorbed doses during thoracic computed tomography scan to evaluate the effectiveness of bismuth shielding [J].
Alonso, Thessa C. ;
Mourao, Arnaldo P. ;
Santana, Priscila C. ;
da Silva, Teogenes A. .
APPLIED RADIATION AND ISOTOPES, 2016, 117 :55-57
[9]  
Ang L, 2018, J INVASIVE CARDIOL, V30, P416
[10]   Pediatric minor head injury imaging practices: results from an ESPR survey [J].
Argyropoulou, Maria, I ;
Alexiou, George A. ;
Xydis, Vassileios G. ;
Adamsbaum, Catherine ;
Chateil, Jean-Francois ;
Rossi, Andrea ;
Girard, Nadine ;
Vazquez, Elida ;
Astrakas, Loukas G. .
NEURORADIOLOGY, 2020, 62 (02) :251-255