Environment-friendly practices: Family versus non-family firms

被引:38
作者
Agostino, Mariarosaria [1 ]
Ruberto, Sabrina [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calabria, Dept Econ Stat & Finance, Cubo 1-C, I-87036 Cosenza, Italy
[2] Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Polit Sci, Via Mezzocannone 4, I-80134 Naples, Italy
关键词
Family firms; Environment-friendly practices; Regulatory pressure; Socioemotional wealth; Institutional theory; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; SOCIOEMOTIONAL WEALTH; STEWARDSHIP THEORY; PERFORMANCE; INNOVATION; OWNERSHIP; BEHAVIOR; BUSINESSES; DIMENSIONS; GOVERNANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129689
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The effect of family ownership on the environmental performance of firms has been increasingly investigated in the economic and business literature, adopting various theoretical frameworks. Nonetheless, only limited empirical research is available, especially in cross-country contexts. Integrating socioemotional wealth (SEW) and stewardship perspectives with institutional theory, this study provides evidence on the relationship between family firms and environment-friendly practices (EFP), highlighting the moderating role of regulatory pressure. Drawing on Enterprise Surveys (ES) conducted in 2018-2020 and applying multiple regression analyses, family ownership is found to be positively associated with the propensity to engage in pollution prevention and control. This evidence corroborates the idea that ceteris paribus SEW and reputational assets associated with family businesses can leverage the tendency of firms to mitigate their environmental footprint. Furthermore, greater institutional pressure appears to be particularly beneficial for non-family firms, which are less likely to pursue nonfinancial goals.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Lasting lending relationships and technical efficiency. Evidence on European SMEs [J].
Agostino, Mariarosaria ;
Ruberto, Sabrina ;
Trivieri, Francesco .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2018, 50 (1-2) :25-40
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, SMALL BUS ECON, DOI DOI 10.1007/s11187-014-9618-9
[3]   How do internal, market and institutional factors affect the development of eco-innovation in firms? [J].
Arranz, Nieves ;
Lopez Arguello, Nohemi ;
Fernandez de Arroyabe, Juan Carlos .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 297 (297)
[4]   Firm Innovation in Emerging Markets: The Role of Finance, Governance, and Competition [J].
Ayyagari, Meghana ;
Demirguec-Kunt, Asli ;
Maksimovic, Vojislav .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, 2011, 46 (06) :1545-1580
[5]   When do family firms have an advantage in transitioning economies? Toward a dynamic institution-based view [J].
Banalieva, Elitsa R. ;
Eddleston, Kimberly A. ;
Zellweger, Thomas M. .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2015, 36 (09) :1358-1377
[6]   Corporate environmentalism - The construct and its measurement [J].
Banerjee, SB .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2002, 55 (03) :177-191
[7]  
Banfield E.C, 1958, The moral basis of a backward society, VII
[8]   Socioemotional Wealth in Family Firms: Theoretical Dimensions, Assessment Approaches, and Agenda for Future Research [J].
Berrone, Pascual ;
Cruz, Cristina ;
Gomez-Mejia, Luis R. .
FAMILY BUSINESS REVIEW, 2012, 25 (03) :258-279
[9]   Socioemotional Wealth and Corporate Responses to Institutional Pressures: Do Family-Controlled Firms Pollute Less? [J].
Berrone, Pascual ;
Cruz, Cristina ;
Gomez-Mejia, Luis R. ;
Larraza-Kintana, Martin .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2010, 55 (01) :82-113
[10]   A Note on Employment and Gross Domestic Product in Swedish Family-Owned Businesses: A Descriptive Analysis [J].
Bjuggren, Carl Magnus ;
Johansson, Dan ;
Sjogren, Hans .
FAMILY BUSINESS REVIEW, 2011, 24 (04) :362-371