Accurate Transmission-Less Attenuation Correction Method for Amyloid-β Brain PET Using Deep Neural Network

被引:7
作者
Choi, Bo-Hye [1 ]
Hwang, Donghwi [2 ]
Kang, Seung-Kwan [2 ]
Kim, Kyeong-Yun [3 ]
Choi, Hongyoon [3 ]
Seo, Seongho [4 ]
Lee, Jae-Sung [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Gachon Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Incheon 13120, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Biomed Sci, Coll Med, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[4] Pai Chai Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Daejeon 35345, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
attenuation correction; convolutional neural network; amyloid; positron emission tomography; Alzheimer's disease; ZERO-ECHO-TIME; PET/MRI EVALUATION; U-NET; IMAGES; SEGMENTATION; MRI; IMPACT; ATLAS; CLASSIFICATION; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.3390/electronics10151836
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The lack of physically measured attenuation maps (mu-maps) for attenuation and scatter correction is an important technical challenge in brain-dedicated stand-alone positron emission tomography (PET) scanners. The accuracy of the calculated attenuation correction is limited by the nonuniformity of tissue composition due to pathologic conditions and the complex structure of facial bones. The aim of this study is to develop an accurate transmission-less attenuation correction method for amyloid-beta (A beta) brain PET studies. We investigated the validity of a deep convolutional neural network trained to produce a CT-derived mu-map (mu-CT) from simultaneously reconstructed activity and attenuation maps using the MLAA (maximum likelihood reconstruction of activity and attenuation) algorithm for A beta brain PET. The performance of three different structures of U-net models (2D, 2.5D, and 3D) were compared. The U-net models generated less noisy and more uniform mu-maps than MLAA mu-maps. Among the three different U-net models, the patch-based 3D U-net model reduced noise and cross-talk artifacts more effectively. The Dice similarity coefficients between the mu-map generated using 3D U-net and mu-CT in bone and air segments were 0.83 and 0.67. All three U-net models showed better voxel-wise correlation of the mu-maps compared to MLAA. The patch-based 3D U-net model was the best. While the uptake value of MLAA yielded a high percentage error of 20% or more, the uptake value of 3D U-nets yielded the lowest percentage error within 5%. The proposed deep learning approach that requires no transmission data, anatomic image, or atlas/template for PET attenuation correction remarkably enhanced the quantitative accuracy of the simultaneously estimated MLAA mu-maps from A beta brain PET.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]   PET/MR brain imaging: evaluation of clinical UTE-based attenuation correction [J].
Aasheim, Lars Birger ;
Karlberg, Anna ;
Goa, Pal Erik ;
Haberg, Asta ;
Sorhaug, Sveinung ;
Fagerli, Unn-Merete ;
Eikenes, Live .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2015, 42 (09) :1439-1446
[2]   Simulation study comparing the helmet-chin PET with a cylindrical PET of the same number of detectors [J].
Ahmed, Abdella M. ;
Tashima, Hideaki ;
Yoshida, Eiji ;
Nishikido, Fumihiko ;
Yamaya, Taiga .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2017, 62 (11) :4541-4550
[3]   MRI-Based Attenuation Correction for PET/MRI Using Multiphase Level-Set Method [J].
An, Hyun Joon ;
Seo, Seongho ;
Kang, Hyejin ;
Choi, Hongyoon ;
Cheon, Gi Jeong ;
Kim, Han-Joon ;
Lee, Dong Soo ;
Song, In Chan ;
Kim, Yu Kyeong ;
Lee, Jae Sung .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2016, 57 (04) :587-593
[4]   Novel adversarial semantic structure deep learning for MRI-guided attenuation correction in brain PET/MRI [J].
Arabi, Hossein ;
Zeng, Guodong ;
Zheng, Guoyan ;
Zaidi, Habib .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2019, 46 (13) :2746-2759
[5]   Transmission scanning in emission tomography [J].
Bailey, DL .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1998, 25 (07) :774-787
[6]   Prediction of stroke thrombolysis outcome using CT brain machine learning [J].
Bentley, Paul ;
Ganesalingam, Jeban ;
Jones, Anoma Lalani Carlton ;
Mahady, Kate ;
Epton, Sarah ;
Rinne, Paul ;
Sharma, Pankaj ;
Halse, Omid ;
Mehta, Amrish ;
Rueckert, Daniel .
NEUROIMAGE-CLINICAL, 2014, 4 :635-640
[7]   DETERMINATION OF OBJECT CONTOUR FROM PROJECTIONS FOR ATTENUATION CORRECTION IN CRANIAL POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY [J].
BERGSTROM, M ;
LITTON, J ;
ERIKSSON, L ;
BOHM, C ;
BLOMQVIST, G .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1982, 6 (02) :365-372
[8]   Toward Implementing an MRI-Based PET Attenuation-Correction Method for Neurologic Studies on the MR-PET Brain Prototype [J].
Catana, Ciprian ;
van der Kouwe, Andre ;
Benner, Thomas ;
Michel, Christian J. ;
Hamm, Michael ;
Fenchel, Matthias ;
Fischl, Bruce ;
Rosen, Bruce ;
Schmand, Matthias ;
Sorensen, A. Gregory .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2010, 51 (09) :1431-1438
[9]   Reworking Multilabel Brain Tumor Segmentation: An Automated Framework Using Structured Kernel Sparse Representation [J].
Chen, Xuan ;
Nguyen, Binh P. ;
Chui, Chee-Kong ;
Ong, Sim-Heng .
IEEE Systems, Man and Cybernetics Magazine, 2017, 3 (02) :18-22
[10]   Attenuation Correction of PET/MR Imaging [J].
Chen, Yasheng ;
An, Hongyu .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2017, 25 (02) :245-+