How retailer and competitor decisions drive the long-term effectiveness of manufacturer promotions for fast moving consumer goods

被引:61
作者
Pauwels, Koen [1 ]
机构
[1] Tuck Sch Business Dartmouth, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
关键词
sales promotions; long-term retailer pass-through and competitor response; jeopardy; impulse response restrictions;
D O I
10.1016/j.jretai.2006.03.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
While both retailer and competitor decisions contribute to long-term promotional effectiveness, their separate impact has yet to be evaluated. For 75 brands in 25 categories, the author finds that the long-term retailer pass-through of promotions is 65 percent, yielding a long-run wholesale promotional elasticity of 1.78 before competitive response. However, competitors partially match the wholesale price reduction by 15 percent, which decreases promotional elasticity by 10 percent. The range of retailer and competitor response across the analyzed cases is very wide, and is affected by category and brand characteristics. As to the former, large categories yield stronger retailer response, while concentrated categories yield stronger competitor response. As to the latter, smaller brands face a fourfold disadvantage compared to leading brands: they obtain lower retail pass-through, lower retail support, and lower benefits from competing brand's promotions, while their promotions generate higher benefits to competitors. Interestingly, the mid-1990s move from off-invoice allowances towards scan-back deals only partially improves their promotional effectiveness compared to that of leading brands. (c) 2007 New York University. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 308
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Market response to a major policy change in the marketing mix: Learning from Procter & Gamble's value pricing strategy [J].
Ailawadi, KL ;
Lehmann, DR ;
Neslin, SA .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2001, 65 (01) :44-61
[2]   The retail power-performance conundrum: What have we learned? [J].
Ailawadi, KL .
JOURNAL OF RETAILING, 2001, 77 (03) :299-318
[3]  
ARMSTRONG MK, 1991, THESIS U TEXASS DALL
[4]   A STOCHASTIC BRAND CHOICE FRAMEWORK FOR ECONOMETRIC MODELING OF TIME-SERIES MARKET SHARE BEHAVIOR [J].
BASS, FM ;
PILON, TL .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1980, 17 (04) :486-497
[5]   Own-brand and cross-brand retail pass-through [J].
Besanko, D ;
Dubé, JP ;
Gupta, S .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 2005, 24 (01) :123-137
[6]   PRICE-INDUCED PATTERNS OF COMPETITION [J].
BLATTBERG, RC ;
WISNIEWSKI, KJ .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 1989, 8 (04) :291-309
[7]   Unobserved retailer behavior in multimarket data: Joint spatial dependence in market shares and promotion variables [J].
Bronnenberg, BJ ;
Mahajan, V .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 2001, 20 (03) :284-299
[8]  
Canondale Associates, 2001, TRAD PROM SPEND MERC
[9]  
Caves RE, 1998, J ECON LIT, V36, P1947
[10]  
Chen MJ, 1996, ACAD MANAGE REV, V21, P100