Self-care research: How to grow the evidence base?

被引:53
作者
Jaarsma, T. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Stromberg, A. [1 ,4 ]
Dunbar, S. B. [5 ]
Fitzsimons, D. [6 ]
Lee, C. [7 ]
Middleton, S. [8 ,9 ]
Vellone, E. [10 ]
Freedland, K. E. [11 ]
Riegel, B. [2 ,12 ]
机构
[1] Linkoping Univ, Dept Hlth Med & Caring Sci, S-58381 Linkoping, Sweden
[2] Australian Catholic Univ, Mary McKillop Inst Hlth Res, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Julius Ctr, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Linkoping Univ, Dept Cardiol, Linkoping, Sweden
[5] Emory Univ, Nell Hodgson Woodruff Sch Nursing, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[6] Queens Univ Belfast, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
[7] Boston Coll, William F Connell Sch Nursing, Chestnut Hill, MA 02167 USA
[8] St Vincents Hlth Australia, Nursing Res Inst, East Sydney, Australia
[9] Australian Catholic Univ, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[10] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
[11] Washington Univ, Dept Psychiat, Sch Med, St Louis, MO 14263 USA
[12] Univ Penn, Sch Nursing, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
基金
瑞典研究理事会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Self-care; Theory; Research designs; Complex interventions; Measurement; Research setting; Definitions; Evidence based; ITEM RESPONSE THEORY; HEART-FAILURE; SOCIAL SUPPORT; BEHAVIOR; ADULTS; CONFIDENCE; INTERVENTIONS; MANAGEMENT; STRATEGIES; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103555
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background and objective: The number of studies in the area of self-care is growing and international researchers are increasingly developing self-care interventions to improve outcomes of individual patients and communities. However, growth of the evidence is still slow due to challenges with designing and testing self-care interventions. In this article we address major methodological challenges with regard to the definition of self-care, use of theory, and research design, intended to provide guidance to researchers in this field. Method: During the inaugural conference of the International Center for Self-Care Research held in Rome, Italy in June 2019 we identified important issues in existing self-care research. Discussion and literature review lead to eight recommendation for future self-care research. Results: In preparation, begin with a theoretically sound definition of self-care. In planning the intervention, build on and extend previous studies. Use theory to develop self-care interventions and consider translational models to guide development, evaluation and implementation of complex self-care interventions. Employ a study design that fits the current phase and objectives of the research and measure self-care and related factors carefully. In reporting, describe the sample and setting sufficiently so that others can draw conclusions about generalizability and applicability to their practice and patient population. In interpretation, describe how the intervention is assumed to work (causal assumptions) and its key components. Conclusion: Our review of existing self-care research clearly illustrates that the recommendations we provide are needed if we are to substantially grow the evidence base supporting self-care. Embracing a core set of principles will allow us to build on each other's work. Tweetable abstract: A core set of methodological principles is needed to substantially grow the evidence base supporting self-care. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]   The role of concordant and discordant comorbidities on performance of self-care behaviors in adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review [J].
Aga, Fekadu ;
Dunbar, Sandra B. ;
Kebede, Tedla ;
Gary, Rebecca A. .
DIABETES METABOLIC SYNDROME AND OBESITY, 2019, 12 :333-356
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, SCIENCE
[3]  
Association AP, 2020, Publication manual of the American psychological association, V7th
[4]   An introduction to implementation science for the non-specialist [J].
Mark S. Bauer ;
Laura Damschroder ;
Hildi Hagedorn ;
Jeffrey Smith ;
Amy M. Kilbourne .
BMC Psychology, 3 (1)
[5]   Explaining and reducing the variation in inter-laboratory reported values for International Normalised Ratio [J].
Bonar, Roslyn ;
Favaloro, Emmanuel J. .
THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2017, 150 :22-29
[6]   Contextualizing disability: a cross-sectional analysis of the association between the built environment and functioning among people living with spinal cord injury in the United States [J].
Botticello, Amanda L. ;
Tulsky, David ;
Heinemann, Allen ;
Charlifue, Susan ;
Kalpakjian, Claire ;
Slavin, Mary ;
Byrne, Rachel ;
Rohrbach, Tanya .
SPINAL CORD, 2019, 57 (02) :100-109
[7]   Self-management and behaviour modification in COPD [J].
Bourbeau, J ;
Nault, D ;
Dang-Tan, T .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2004, 52 (03) :271-277
[8]  
Brown Celia A, 2006, BMC Med Res Methodol, V6, P54
[9]   Mitigating Systematic Measurement Error in Comparative Effectiveness Research in Heterogeneous Populations [J].
Carle, Adam C. .
MEDICAL CARE, 2010, 48 (06) :S68-S74
[10]   A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity [J].
Carroll, Christopher ;
Patterson, Malcolm ;
Wood, Stephen ;
Booth, Andrew ;
Rick, Jo ;
Balain, Shashi .
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2007, 2