German acupuncture trials (GERAC) for chronic low back pain -: Randomized, multicenter, blinded, parallel-group trial with 3 groups

被引:474
作者
Haake, Michael
Muller, Hans-Helge
Schade-Brittinger, Carmen
Basler, Heinz D.
Schaefer, Helmut
Maier, Christoph
Endres, Heinz G.
Trampisch, Hans J.
Molsberger, Albrecht
机构
[1] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Dept Med Informat Stat & Epidemiol, D-4630 Bochum, Germany
[2] Univ Regensburg, Dept Orthoped, Bad Abbach, Germany
[3] Univ Marburg, Inst Med Biometry & Epidemiol, Marburg, Germany
[4] Univ Marburg, Dept Med Physiol, Marburg, Germany
[5] Univ Marburg, Ctr Clin Trials, Marburg, Germany
[6] Univ Marburg, Marburg, Germany
[7] Ruhr Univ Bochum, BG Klin Bergmannsheil, Dept Pain Management, D-4630 Bochum, Germany
[8] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Dept Med Informat Stat & Epidemiol, D-4630 Bochum, Germany
[9] Ctr Clin Acupuncture & Res, Dusseldorf, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archinte.167.17.1892
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: To our knowledge, verum acupuncture has never been directly compared with sham acupuncture and guideline-based conventional therapy in patients with chronic low back pain. Methods: A patient- and observer-blinded randomized controlled trial conducted in Germany involving 340 outpatient practices, including 1162 patients aged 18 to 86 years (mean +/- SD age, 50 +/- 15 years) with a history of chronic low back pain for a mean of 8 years. Patients underwent ten 30-minute sessions, generally 2 sessions per week, of verum acupuncture (n = 387) according to principles of traditional Chinese medicine; sham acupuncture (n = 387) consisting of superficial needling at nonacupuncture points; or conventional therapy, a combination of drugs, physical therapy, and exercise (n = 388). Five additional sessions were offered to patients who had a partial response to treatment (10%-50% reduction in pain intensity). Primary outcome was response after 6 months, defined as 33% improvement or better on 3 pain-related items on the Von Korff Chronic Pain Grade Scale questionnaire or 12% improvement or better on the back-specific Hanover Functional Ability Questionnaire. Patients who were unblinded or had recourse to other than permitted concomitant therapies during follow-up were classified as nonresponders regardless of symptom improvement. Results: At 6 months, response rate was 47.6% in the verum acupuncture group, 44.2% in the sham acupuncture group, and 27.4% in the conventional therapy group. Differences among groups were as follows: verum vs sham, 3.4% (95% confidence interval, -3.7% to 10.3%; P = . 39); verum vs conventional therapy, 20.2% (95% confidence interval, 13.4% to 26.7%; P < . 001); and sham vs conventional therapy, 16.8% (95% confidence interval, 10.1% to 23.4%; P < . 001. Conclusions: Low back pain improved after acupuncture treatment for at least 6 months. Effectiveness of acupuncture, either verum or sham, was almost twice that of conventional therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:1892 / 1898
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[21]   Low back pain: an economic assessment in the United States [J].
Pai, S ;
Sundaram, LJ .
ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2004, 35 (01) :1-+
[22]   Acupuncture for low back pain [J].
Shekelle, P .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 143 (09) :691-692
[23]  
Thompson I, 2005, LANG LEARN TECHNOL, V9, P1
[24]  
VINCENT C, 1995, J ROY SOC MED, V88, P199
[25]   A FEAR-AVOIDANCE BELIEFS QUESTIONNAIRE (FABQ) AND THE ROLE OF FEAR-AVOIDANCE BELIEFS IN CHRONIC LOW-BACK-PAIN AND DISABILITY [J].
WADDELL, G ;
NEWTON, M ;
HENDERSON, I ;
SOMERVILLE, D ;
MAIN, CJ .
PAIN, 1993, 52 (02) :157-168