German acupuncture trials (GERAC) for chronic low back pain -: Randomized, multicenter, blinded, parallel-group trial with 3 groups

被引:474
作者
Haake, Michael
Muller, Hans-Helge
Schade-Brittinger, Carmen
Basler, Heinz D.
Schaefer, Helmut
Maier, Christoph
Endres, Heinz G.
Trampisch, Hans J.
Molsberger, Albrecht
机构
[1] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Dept Med Informat Stat & Epidemiol, D-4630 Bochum, Germany
[2] Univ Regensburg, Dept Orthoped, Bad Abbach, Germany
[3] Univ Marburg, Inst Med Biometry & Epidemiol, Marburg, Germany
[4] Univ Marburg, Dept Med Physiol, Marburg, Germany
[5] Univ Marburg, Ctr Clin Trials, Marburg, Germany
[6] Univ Marburg, Marburg, Germany
[7] Ruhr Univ Bochum, BG Klin Bergmannsheil, Dept Pain Management, D-4630 Bochum, Germany
[8] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Dept Med Informat Stat & Epidemiol, D-4630 Bochum, Germany
[9] Ctr Clin Acupuncture & Res, Dusseldorf, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archinte.167.17.1892
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: To our knowledge, verum acupuncture has never been directly compared with sham acupuncture and guideline-based conventional therapy in patients with chronic low back pain. Methods: A patient- and observer-blinded randomized controlled trial conducted in Germany involving 340 outpatient practices, including 1162 patients aged 18 to 86 years (mean +/- SD age, 50 +/- 15 years) with a history of chronic low back pain for a mean of 8 years. Patients underwent ten 30-minute sessions, generally 2 sessions per week, of verum acupuncture (n = 387) according to principles of traditional Chinese medicine; sham acupuncture (n = 387) consisting of superficial needling at nonacupuncture points; or conventional therapy, a combination of drugs, physical therapy, and exercise (n = 388). Five additional sessions were offered to patients who had a partial response to treatment (10%-50% reduction in pain intensity). Primary outcome was response after 6 months, defined as 33% improvement or better on 3 pain-related items on the Von Korff Chronic Pain Grade Scale questionnaire or 12% improvement or better on the back-specific Hanover Functional Ability Questionnaire. Patients who were unblinded or had recourse to other than permitted concomitant therapies during follow-up were classified as nonresponders regardless of symptom improvement. Results: At 6 months, response rate was 47.6% in the verum acupuncture group, 44.2% in the sham acupuncture group, and 27.4% in the conventional therapy group. Differences among groups were as follows: verum vs sham, 3.4% (95% confidence interval, -3.7% to 10.3%; P = . 39); verum vs conventional therapy, 20.2% (95% confidence interval, 13.4% to 26.7%; P < . 001); and sham vs conventional therapy, 16.8% (95% confidence interval, 10.1% to 23.4%; P < . 001. Conclusions: Low back pain improved after acupuncture treatment for at least 6 months. Effectiveness of acupuncture, either verum or sham, was almost twice that of conventional therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:1892 / 1898
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
*AKDA, 2000, EMPF THER KREUZSCH
[2]   Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain [J].
Andersson, GBJ .
LANCET, 1999, 354 (9178) :581-585
[3]  
Brinkhaus B, 2006, ARCH INTERN MED, V166, P450
[4]   Persistent low back pain [J].
Carragee, EJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 352 (18) :1891-1898
[5]   Determinants for receiving acupuncture for LBP and associated treatments: a prospective cohort study [J].
Chenot, Jean-Francois ;
Becker, Annette ;
Leonhardt, Corinna ;
Keller, Stefan ;
Donner-Banzhoff, Norbert ;
Baum, Erika ;
Pfingsten, Michael ;
Hildebrandt, Jan ;
Kochen, Michael M. ;
Basler, Heinz-Dieter .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2006, 6 (1)
[6]   Seeking a simple measure of analgesia for mega-trials: is a single global assessment good enough? [J].
Collins, SL ;
Edwards, J ;
Moore, RA ;
Smith, LA ;
McQuay, HJ .
PAIN, 2001, 91 (1-2) :189-194
[7]   Primary care - Low back pain [J].
Deyo, RA ;
Weinstein, JN .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 344 (05) :363-370
[8]  
Endres HG, 2004, EUR J MED RES, V9, P545
[9]   German Acupuncture Trials (gerac) address problems of methodology associated with acupuncture studies [J].
Endres, HG ;
Zenz, M ;
Schaub, C ;
Molsberger, A ;
Haake, M ;
Streitberger, K ;
Skipka, G ;
Maier, C .
SCHMERZ, 2005, 19 (03) :201-+
[10]   Defining the clinically important difference in pain outcome measures [J].
Farrar, JT ;
Portenoy, RK ;
Berlin, JA ;
Kinman, JL ;
Strom, BL .
PAIN, 2000, 88 (03) :287-294