Use of patient-reported outcomes to measure symptoms and health related quality of life in the clinic

被引:73
作者
Gilbert, Alexandra [1 ]
Sebag-Montefiore, David [2 ]
Davidson, Susan [3 ]
Velikova, Galina [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, MRCP, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Leeds, FRCR FRCP, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Christie Hosp, FRCR FRCP Glasg, Manchester, Lancs, England
[4] Univ Leeds, FRCP, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Patient report outcomes; Symptoms; Health related quality of life; Clinical practice; Internet; Electronic data capture; CANCER REGISTRY DATA; ONCOLOGY PRACTICE; FOLLOW-UP; ROUTINE PRACTICE; CARE; TRIALS; IMPACT; FEASIBILITY; ASSESSMENTS; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.11.071
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
There is increasing interest in the use of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in routine practice in cancer care to measure symptoms and health related quality of life (HRQOL). PROs are designed to capture the patient's perspective of their care and treatment, and complement the traditional clinical outcomes of survival and toxicity assessment. Integrating routine collection and feedback of PROs has been found to improve care for patients on both an individual level, through improved communication and management of symptoms, and at an organizational level, by enabling aggregation of data to compare performance. This article reviews the benefits and challenges of introducing patient-reported assessments into routine clinical practice. Methods for choosing a questionnaire; collection and presentation of results; timing and frequency of administration as well as clinician training methods to aid the ability of clinicians to integrate the use of PROs into their own practice are described. Electronic PRO capture and integration with electronic health records seems to provide the most effective method for seamless integration into existing patient care pathways. Case studies from our own practice illustrate the issues raised. Electronic methods enabling immediate collection, scoring and interpretation of the data, as well as real-time data capture, email alert systems and individualized, online self-management advice may enable severe symptoms to be managed in a more timely manner. Evaluation methods are described to establish the effectiveness of the PRO intervention. Engaging stakeholders throughout the process of initial consultation and development, during delivery and evaluation is key to success. Future work needs to focus on the effectiveness of PROs in longer-term follow-up of patients in routine care and the relationship between the PRO severity grading and clinician severity grading using the Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events (CTCAE). (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:429 / 439
页数:11
相关论文
共 87 条
[61]  
Nama V, 2013, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, V11
[62]   The relationship of body mass index with quality of life among endometrial cancer survivors: A study from the population-based PROFILES registry [J].
Oldenburg, Charlotte S. ;
Boll, Dorry ;
Nicolaije, Kim A. H. ;
Vos, M. Caroline ;
Pijnenborg, Johanna M. A. ;
Coebergh, Jan-Willem ;
Beijer, Sandra ;
van de Poll-Franse, Lonneke V. ;
Ezendam, Nicole P. M. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2013, 129 (01) :216-221
[63]   Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores [J].
Osoba, D ;
Rodrigues, G ;
Myles, J ;
Zee, B ;
Pater, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1998, 16 (01) :139-144
[64]   Patient Self-Reports of Symptoms and Clinician Ratings as Predictors of Overall Cancer Survival [J].
Quinten, Chantal ;
Maringwa, John ;
Gotay, Carolyn C. ;
Martinelli, Francesca ;
Coens, Corneel ;
Reeve, Bryce B. ;
Flechtner, Henning ;
Greimel, Eva ;
King, Madeleine ;
Osoba, David ;
Cleeland, Charles ;
Ringash, Jolie ;
Schmucker-Von Koch, Joseph ;
Taphoorn, Martin J. B. ;
Weis, Joachim ;
Bottomley, Andrew .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2011, 103 (24) :1851-1858
[65]   Assessment is not enough: a randomized controlled trial of the effects of HRQL assessment on quality of life and satisfaction in oncology clinical practice [J].
Rosenbloom, Sarah K. ;
Victorson, David E. ;
Hahn, Elizabeth A. ;
Peterman, Amy H. ;
Cella, David .
PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2007, 16 (12) :1069-1079
[66]   Preoperative radiotherapy versus selective postoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer (MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG C016): a multicentre, randomised trial [J].
Sebag-Montefiore, David ;
Stephens, Richard J. ;
Steele, Robert ;
Monson, John ;
Grieve, Robert ;
Khanna, Subhash ;
Quirke, Phil ;
Couture, Jean ;
de Metz, Catherine ;
Myint, Arthur Sun ;
Bessell, Eric ;
Griffiths, Gareth ;
Thompson, Lindsay C. ;
Parmar, Mahesh .
LANCET, 2009, 373 (9666) :811-820
[67]   ON THE USES OF ROUTINE PATIENT-REPORTED HEALTH OUTCOME DATA [J].
Smith, Peter C. ;
Street, Andrew D. .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2013, 22 (02) :119-131
[68]   Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: a review of the options and considerations [J].
Snyder, Claire F. ;
Aaronson, Neil K. ;
Choucair, Ali K. ;
Elliott, Thomas E. ;
Greenhalgh, Joanne ;
Halyard, Michele Y. ;
Hess, Rachel ;
Miller, Deborah M. ;
Reeve, Bryce B. ;
Santana, Maria .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2012, 21 (08) :1305-1314
[69]   Why and How Should We Measure the Long-Term Consequences of Rectal Cancer Treatment? [J].
Spindler, Karen-Lise Garm ;
Sebag-Montefiore, David .
CURRENT COLORECTAL CANCER REPORTS, 2011, 7 (01) :97-104
[70]   Dose to the inferior rectum is strongly associated with patient reported bowel quality of life after radiation therapy for prostate cancer [J].
Stenmark, Matthew H. ;
Conlon, Anna S. C. ;
Johnson, Skyler ;
Daignault, Stephanie ;
Litzenberg, Dale ;
Marsh, Robin ;
Ritter, Timothy ;
Vance, Sean ;
Kazzi, Nayla ;
Feng, Felix Y. ;
Sandler, Howard ;
Sanda, Martin G. ;
Hamstra, Daniel A. .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 110 (02) :291-297