Multispecies genetic objectives in spatial conservation planning

被引:39
作者
Nielsen, Erica S. [1 ]
Beger, Maria [2 ]
Henriques, Romina [1 ]
Selkoe, Kimberly A. [3 ]
von der Heyden, Sophie [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stellenbosch, Dept Bot & Zool, Evolutionary Genom Grp, Private Bag X1, ZA-7602 Stellenbosch, South Africa
[2] Univ Leeds, Sch Biol, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Natl Ctr Ecol Anal & Synth, 735 State St, Santa Barbara, CA 93101 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
conservation genetics; genetic diversity; genetic isolation; intertidal ecology; Marxan; spatial prioritization; MARINE PROTECTED AREAS; EVOLUTIONARY PROCESSES; INDO-PACIFIC; POPULATION-GENETICS; COMMUNITY GENETICS; MITOCHONDRIAL-DNA; CLIMATE-CHANGE; RESILIENCE; ECOSYSTEMS; DIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1111/cobi.12875
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Growing threats to biodiversity and global alteration of habitats and species distributions make it increasingly necessary to consider evolutionary patterns in conservation decision making. Yet, there is no clear-cut guidance on how genetic features can be incorporated into conservation-planning processes, despite multiple molecular markers and several genetic metrics for each marker type to choose from. Genetic patterns differ between species, but the potential tradeoffs among genetic objectives for multiple species in conservation planning are currently understudied. We compared spatial conservation prioritizations derived from 2 metrics of genetic diversity (nucleotide and haplotype diversity) and 2 metrics of genetic isolation (private haplotypes and local genetic differentiation) in mitochondrial DNA of 5 marine species. We compared outcomes of conservation plans based only on habitat representation with plans based on genetic data and habitat representation. Fewer priority areas were selected for conservation plans based solely on habitat representation than on plans that included habitat and genetic data. All 4 genetic metrics selected approximately similar conservation-priority areas, which is likely a result of prioritizing genetic patterns across a genetically diverse array of species. Largely, our results suggest that multispecies genetic conservation objectives are vital to creating protected-area networks that appropriately preserve community-level evolutionary patterns.
引用
收藏
页码:872 / 882
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Conservation Objectives and Sea-Surface Temperature Anomalies in the Great Barrier Reef
    Ban, Natalie C.
    Pressey, Robert L.
    Weeks, Scarla
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2012, 26 (05) : 799 - 809
  • [22] Conservation planning for adaptive and neutral evolutionary processes
    Hanson, Jeffrey O.
    Marques, Adam
    Verissimo, Ana
    Camacho-Sanchez, Miguel
    Velo-Anton, Guillermo
    Martinez-Solano, Inigo
    Carvalho, Silvia B.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2020, 57 (11) : 2159 - 2169
  • [23] Objectives, criteria and methods for using molecular genetic data in priority setting for conservation of animal genetic resources
    Boettcher, P. J.
    Tixier-Boichard, M.
    Toro, M. A.
    Simianer, H.
    Eding, H.
    Gandini, G.
    Joost, S.
    Garcia, D.
    Colli, L.
    Ajmone-Marsan, P.
    ANIMAL GENETICS, 2010, 41 : 64 - 77
  • [24] Predictive spatial niche and biodiversity hotspot models for small mammal communities in Alaska: applying machine-learning to conservation planning
    Baltensperger, Andrew P.
    Huettmann, Falk
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2015, 30 (04) : 681 - 697
  • [25] Collaborative conservation planning: Quantifying the contribution of expert engagement to identify spatial conservation priorities
    Selwood, Katherine E.
    Wintle, Brendan A.
    Kujala, Heini
    CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2019, 12 (06):
  • [26] Evolving spatial conservation prioritization with intraspecific genetic data
    Andrello, Marco
    D'Aloia, Cassidy
    Dalongeville, Alicia
    Escalante, Marco A.
    Guerrero, Jimena
    Perrier, Charles
    Torres-Florez, Juan Pablo
    Xuereb, Amanda
    Manel, Stephanie
    TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2022, 37 (06) : 553 - 564
  • [27] Spatial socioeconomic data as a cost in systematic marine conservation planning
    Ban, Natalie Corinna
    Klein, Carissa Joy
    CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2009, 2 (05): : 206 - 215
  • [28] Spatial patterns of benthic megahabitats and conservation planning in the Abrolhos Bank
    Moura, Rodrigo Leao
    Secchin, Nelio Augusto
    Amado-Filho, Gilberto Menezes
    Francini-Filho, Ronaldo Bastos
    Freitas, Matheus Oliveira
    Minte-Vera, Carolina Viviana
    Teixeira, Joao Batista
    Thompson, Fabiano Lopes
    Dutra, Guilherme Fraga
    Gomes Sumida, Paulo Yukio
    Guth, Arthur Zigliatti
    Lopes, Rubens Mendes
    Bastos, Alex Cardoso
    CONTINENTAL SHELF RESEARCH, 2013, 70 : 109 - 117
  • [29] Operationalizing ecological connectivity in spatial conservation planning with Marxan Connect
    Daigle, Remi M.
    Metaxas, Anna
    Balbar, Arieanna C.
    McGowan, Jennifer
    Treml, Eric A.
    Kuempel, Caitlin D.
    Possingham, Hugh P.
    Beger, Maria
    METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2020, 11 (04): : 570 - 579
  • [30] The influence of planning unit characteristics on the efficiency and spatial pattern of systematic conservation planning assessments
    Nhancale, Bruno A.
    Smith, Robert J.
    BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2011, 20 (08) : 1821 - 1835