Multispecies genetic objectives in spatial conservation planning

被引:39
|
作者
Nielsen, Erica S. [1 ]
Beger, Maria [2 ]
Henriques, Romina [1 ]
Selkoe, Kimberly A. [3 ]
von der Heyden, Sophie [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stellenbosch, Dept Bot & Zool, Evolutionary Genom Grp, Private Bag X1, ZA-7602 Stellenbosch, South Africa
[2] Univ Leeds, Sch Biol, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Natl Ctr Ecol Anal & Synth, 735 State St, Santa Barbara, CA 93101 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
conservation genetics; genetic diversity; genetic isolation; intertidal ecology; Marxan; spatial prioritization; MARINE PROTECTED AREAS; EVOLUTIONARY PROCESSES; INDO-PACIFIC; POPULATION-GENETICS; COMMUNITY GENETICS; MITOCHONDRIAL-DNA; CLIMATE-CHANGE; RESILIENCE; ECOSYSTEMS; DIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1111/cobi.12875
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Growing threats to biodiversity and global alteration of habitats and species distributions make it increasingly necessary to consider evolutionary patterns in conservation decision making. Yet, there is no clear-cut guidance on how genetic features can be incorporated into conservation-planning processes, despite multiple molecular markers and several genetic metrics for each marker type to choose from. Genetic patterns differ between species, but the potential tradeoffs among genetic objectives for multiple species in conservation planning are currently understudied. We compared spatial conservation prioritizations derived from 2 metrics of genetic diversity (nucleotide and haplotype diversity) and 2 metrics of genetic isolation (private haplotypes and local genetic differentiation) in mitochondrial DNA of 5 marine species. We compared outcomes of conservation plans based only on habitat representation with plans based on genetic data and habitat representation. Fewer priority areas were selected for conservation plans based solely on habitat representation than on plans that included habitat and genetic data. All 4 genetic metrics selected approximately similar conservation-priority areas, which is likely a result of prioritizing genetic patterns across a genetically diverse array of species. Largely, our results suggest that multispecies genetic conservation objectives are vital to creating protected-area networks that appropriately preserve community-level evolutionary patterns.
引用
收藏
页码:872 / 882
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Integrated conservation planning for coral reefs: Designing conservation zones for multiple conservation objectives in spatial prioritisation
    Magris, Rafael A.
    Pressey, Robert L.
    Mills, Morena
    Vila-Nova, Daniele A.
    Floeter, Sergio
    GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2017, 11 : 53 - 68
  • [2] Conservation ready marine spatial planning
    Reimer, Julie M.
    Devillers, Rodolphe
    Trouillet, Brice
    Ban, Natalie C.
    Agardy, Tundi
    Claudet, Joachim
    MARINE POLICY, 2023, 153
  • [3] Evaluating marine spatial closures with conflicting fisheries and conservation objectives
    Dichmont, Catherine M.
    Ellis, Nick
    Bustamante, Rodrigo H.
    Deng, Roy
    Tickell, Sharon
    Pascual, Ricardo
    Lozano-Montes, Hector
    Griffiths, Shane
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2013, 50 (04) : 1060 - 1070
  • [4] Marine conservation of multispecies and multi-use areas with various conservation objectives and targets
    Schmiing, Mara
    Diogo, Hugo
    Santos, Ricardo Serrao
    Afonso, Pedro
    ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2015, 72 (03) : 851 - 862
  • [5] The effect of contrasting threat mitigation objectives on spatial conservation priorities
    Boon, Pei Ya
    Beger, Maria
    MARINE POLICY, 2016, 68 : 23 - 29
  • [6] Environmental and geographic variables are effective surrogates for genetic variation in conservation planning
    Hanson, Jeffrey O.
    Rhodes, Jonathan R.
    Riginos, Cynthia
    Fuller, Richard A.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2017, 114 (48) : 12755 - 12760
  • [7] Demystifying ecological connectivity for actionable spatial conservation planning
    Beger, Maria
    Metaxas, Anna
    Balbar, Arieanna C.
    McGowan, Jennifer A.
    Daigle, Remi
    Kuempel, Caitlin D.
    Treml, Eric A.
    Possingham, Hugh P.
    TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2022, 37 (12) : 1079 - 1091
  • [8] Tracking marine megafauna for conservation and marine spatial planning
    Pereira, Jorge M. M.
    Clay, Thomas A. A.
    Reisinger, Ryan R. R.
    Ropert-Coudert, Yan
    Sequeira, Ana M. M.
    FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2023, 9
  • [9] Spatial conservation planning of forest genetic resources in a Mediterranean multi-refugial area
    Vajana, Elia
    Andrello, Marco
    Avanzi, Camilla
    Bagnoli, Francesca
    Vendramin, Giovanni G.
    Piotti, Andrea
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2024, 293
  • [10] Multicriterion trade-offs and synergies for spatial conservation planning
    Gunton, Richard M.
    Marsh, Charles J.
    Moulherat, Sylvain
    Malchow, Anne-Kathleen
    Bocedi, Greta
    Klenke, Reinhard A.
    Kunin, William E.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2017, 54 (03) : 903 - 913