A Distal Resection Margin of ≤1 mm and Rectal Cancer Recurrence After Sphincter-Preserving Surgery: The Role of a Positive Distal Margin in Rectal Cancer Surgery

被引:37
作者
Zeng, Wei-gen [1 ]
Liu, Meng-jia [2 ]
Zhou, Zhi-xiang [3 ]
Wang, Zhen-jun [1 ]
机构
[1] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Chao Yang Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, 8 Gongtinan Rd, Beijing 100020, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Peking Union Med Coll, Natl Canc Ctr, Dept Ultrasound,Canc Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Dept Colorectal Surg, Peking Union Med Coll, Natl Canc Ctr,Canc Hosp, 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Beijing 100021, Peoples R China
关键词
Distal margin; Mortality; Recurrence; Rectal cancer; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; CIRCUMFERENTIAL MARGIN; LOCAL RECURRENCE; CM; NEOADJUVANT CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; PREOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; COLORECTAL-CANCER; PROGNOSTIC-FACTOR; CARCINOMA; SPREAD;
D O I
10.1097/DCR.0000000000000900
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: There is little information about the prognostic value of a microscopically positive distal margin in patients who have rectal cancer. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the influence of a distal margin of <= 1 mm on oncologic outcomes after sphincter-preserving resection for rectal cancer. DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at 2 hospitals. PATIENTS: A total of 6574 patients underwent anterior resection for rectal cancer from January 1999 to December 2014; 97 (1.5%) patients with a distal margin of <= 1 mm were included in this study. For comparative analyses, patients were matched with 194 patients with a negative distal margin (>1 mm) according to sex, age, BMI, ASA score, neoadjuvant treatment, tumor location, and stage. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The oncologic outcomes of the 2 groups were compared. RESULTS: Perineural and lymphovascular invasion rates were significantly higher in patients with a positive distal margin (54.6% vs 28.9%; 67.0% vs 42.8%; both p < 0.001) compared with to patients with negative distal margin. Comparison between microscopically positive and negative distal margin showed worse oncologic outcomes in patients with a microscopically positive distal margin, including 5-year local recurrence rate (24.1% vs 12.0%, p = 0.005); 5-year distant recurrence rate (35.5% vs 20.2%, p = 0.011); 5-year disease-free survival (45.5% vs 69.5%, p < 0.001); and 5-year OS (69.2% vs 79.7%, p = 0.004). Among the 97 patients with a microscopically positive distal margin, the 5-year disease-free survival rate was higher in patients who received adjuvant therapy (52.0% vs 30.7%, p = 0.089). LIMITATIONS: This is a retrospective study; bias may exist. CONCLUSIONS: A distal margin of 1 mm is associated with worse oncologic results. Our data indicate the importance of achieving a clear distal margin in the surgical treatment of rectal cancer. Adjuvant therapy should be used in these patients to reduce recurrence.
引用
收藏
页码:1175 / 1183
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   ROLE OF CIRCUMFERENTIAL MARGIN INVOLVEMENT IN THE LOCAL RECURRENCE OF RECTAL-CANCER [J].
ADAM, IJ ;
MOHAMDEE, MO ;
MARTIN, IG ;
SCOTT, N ;
FINAN, PJ ;
JOHNSTON, D ;
DIXON, MF ;
QUIRKE, P .
LANCET, 1994, 344 (8924) :707-711
[2]   Distal intramural spread in adenocarcinoma of the lower third of the rectum treated with total rectal resection and coloanal anastomosis [J].
Andreola, S ;
Leo, E ;
Belli, F ;
Lavarino, C ;
Bufalino, R ;
Tomasic, G ;
Baldini, MT ;
Valvo, F ;
Navarria, P ;
Lombardi, F .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1997, 40 (01) :25-29
[3]   Local recurrence following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer [J].
Arbman, G ;
Nilsson, E ;
Hallbook, O ;
Sjodahl, R .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 83 (03) :375-379
[4]   Chemotherapy with preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer [J].
Bosset, Jean-Francois ;
Collette, Laurence ;
Calais, Gilles ;
Mineur, Laurent ;
Maingon, Philippe ;
Radosevic-Jelic, Ljiljana ;
Daban, Alain ;
Bardet, Etienne ;
Beny, Alexander ;
Ollier, Jean-Claude .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 355 (11) :1114-1123
[5]   Is the 1-cm Rule of Distal Bowel Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer Based on Clinical Evidence? A Systematic Review [J].
Bujko, Krzysztof ;
Rutkowski, Andrzej ;
Chang, George J. ;
Michalski, Wojciech ;
Chmielik, Ewa ;
Kusnierz, Jerzy .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 19 (03) :801-808
[6]   What happens after R1 resection in patients undergoing laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer? A study in 333 consecutive patients [J].
Debove, C. ;
Maggiori, L. ;
Chau, A. ;
Kanso, F. ;
Ferron, M. ;
Panis, Y. .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2015, 17 (03) :197-204
[7]   Pushing the Envelope Beyond a Centimeter in Rectal Cancer: Oncologic Implications of Close, But Negative Margins [J].
Fitzgerald, Timothy L. ;
Brinkley, Jason ;
Zervos, Emmanuel E. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2011, 213 (05) :589-595
[8]   Circumferential margin involvement is the crucial prognostic factor after multimodality treatment in patients with locally advanced rectal carcinoma [J].
Gosens, Marleen J. E. M. ;
Klaassen, Rene A. ;
Tan-Go, Ivonne ;
Rutten, Harm J. T. ;
Martijn, Hendrik ;
van den Brule, Adriaan J. C. ;
Nieuwenhuijzen, Grard A. P. ;
van Krieken, J. Han J. M. ;
Nagtegaal, Iris D. .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2007, 13 (22) :6617-6623
[9]  
HEALD RJ, 1986, LANCET, V1, P1479
[10]   THE MESORECTUM IN RECTAL-CANCER SURGERY - THE CLUE TO PELVIC RECURRENCE [J].
HEALD, RJ ;
HUSBAND, EM ;
RYALL, RDH .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1982, 69 (10) :613-616