Therapeutic options in lithiasis of the lumbar ureter

被引:23
作者
Arrabal-Martín, M [1 ]
Pareja-Vilches, M [1 ]
Gutiérrez-Tejero, F [1 ]
Miján-Ortiz, JL [1 ]
Palao-Yago, F [1 ]
Zuluaga-Gómez, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp, Dept Urol San Cecilio, Granada 18004, Spain
关键词
lithiasis of the lumbar ureter; ureteroscopy; extracorporeal lithotripsy;
D O I
10.1016/S0302-2838(03)00091-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: In the past 25 years, the treatment of lithiasis of the lumbar ureter has evolved from ureterolithotomy to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy and/or endoscopic lithotripsy. Our objective has been to analyse the results of extracorporeal lithotripsy and endoscopic surgery in lithiasis of the lumbar ureter. Materials and Methods: We have analysed 734 single calculi of the lumbar ureter treated during the decade 1990-2000, excluding patients with lithiasis in other locations in order to avoid bias in the assessment of the results. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) was carried out using a Siemens Lithostar, urinary diversion with a double pigtail ureteric catheter or percutaneous nephrostomy, semi-rigid ureteroscopy and electrokinetic contact lithotripsy. The patient were divided into six groups. We assessed complete and partial success, the fragmentation index, and complications, analysing the results using a test for the comparison of proportions. Results: In group A, non-obstructive lithiasis treated by in situ ESWL, complete success was achieved in 95.5%. In group B, obstructed lithiasis treated by in situ ESWL, 93.15%. In group C, obstructive lithiasis treated with a double pigtail catheter and ESWL, 81.11%. In group D, obstructive lithiasis treated with percutaneous nephrostomy and ESWL, 93.75%. In group E, ureteric lithiasis <1 cm, treated by retrograde displacement to the renal cavities and ESWL, 82.3%. In group F, lithiasis of the lumbar ureter treated by ureteroscopy, 91%. Conclusions: The primary therapeutic option for the treatment lithiasis of the lumbar ureter, in the absence of criteria for urinary diversion, is in situ ESWL. We consider the criteria for urinary diversion prior to ESWL to be severe obstruction, obstruction associated with urinary tract infection, and obstruction caused by a proximal ureteric calculus adjacent to the inferior renal pole. Ureteroscopy and/or contact lithotripsy is the technique of choice in lithiasis of the lumbar ureter resistant to ESWL due to non-fragmentation or to the persistence of impacted fragments. Ureteroscopy may be the first choice of therapy in obstructive lithiasis, substituting urinary diversion plus ESWL. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:556 / 563
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Biyani CS, 1998, SCAND J UROL NEPHROL, V32, P92
[2]   NONSTENT OR NONCATHETER EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY FOR URETERAL STONES [J].
CASS, AS .
UROLOGY, 1994, 43 (02) :178-181
[3]  
CASS AS, 1992, J UROLOGY, V6, P1786
[4]   1ST CLINICAL-EXPERIENCE WITH EXTRACORPOREALLY INDUCED DESTRUCTION OF KIDNEY-STONES BY SHOCK-WAVES [J].
CHAUSSY, C ;
SCHMIEDT, E ;
JOCHAM, D ;
BRENDEL, W ;
FORSSMANN, B ;
WALTHER, V .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1982, 127 (03) :417-420
[5]   THE TREATMENT OF 100 CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS WITH URETERAL CALCULI IN A BRITISH STONE CENTER [J].
COPTCOAT, MJ ;
WEBB, DR ;
KELLETT, MJ ;
WHITFIELD, HN ;
WICKHAM, JEA .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1987, 137 (06) :1122-1123
[6]  
CORDERO JMD, 1991, ACTA UROL ESP, V15, P446
[7]  
du Fosse W, 1998, Acta Urol Belg, V66, P33
[8]  
ENGUITA CG, 2000, ACTA UROL ESP, V9, P721
[9]  
Gonzalez Enguita C, 2001, Arch Esp Urol, V54, P971
[10]  
Grasso M, 1995, Tech Urol, V1, P39