Evaluation of maize production under mobile drip irrigation

被引:15
作者
Oker, Tobias E. [1 ,4 ]
Kisekka, Isaya [2 ,3 ]
Sheshukov, Aleksey Y. [1 ]
Aguilar, Jonathan [1 ,4 ]
Rogers, Danny H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Kansas State Univ, Dept Biol & Agr Engn, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Land Air & Water Resources, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[3] BAE, Arlington, VA 22209 USA
[4] Kansas State Univ, Southwest Res Extens Ctr, Garden City, NY USA
关键词
Mobile Drip Irrigation; LEPA; LESA; Center-pivot; Irrigation; Ogallala; YIELD RESPONSE; WATER-STRESS; GRAIN-YIELD; CORN YIELD; BIOMASS; NITROGEN; INDEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.agwat.2018.07.047
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Declining water levels in the Ogallala aquifer of the U.S. High Plains necessitate more efficient irrigation technology to sustain agricultural production. A study to evaluate the performance of Mobile Drip Irrigation (MDI) for maize production, in comparison to common center-pivot nozzles (Low Elevation Spray Application (LESA) and Low Energy Precision Application (LEPA)) was conducted. A center-pivot was retrofitted with MDI, LEPA and LESA. Irrigation capacities of 6.3, 3.1, and 1.6 mm/d were considered. Grain yield, water use efficiency, above ground biomass, leaf area index (LAI), and soil water content was compared. Differences in grain yield between irrigation application devices were not significant (p = 0.085), but there were differences between irrigation capacities (p < 0.0001) at 5% significance level. There were no significant differences in monthly biomass yield between the application devices but there were significant differences in biomass yield between irrigation capacities. There were no significant differences in LAI between both the application devices and irrigation capacities. There were no significant differences in water use efficiency between the application technologies (p = 0.2352), at 5% significance level, however, differences between irrigation capacities were significant (p = 0.050). Generally, crop biophysical measurements under MDI were not significantly different from those under LEPA and LESA. Any marginal benefits of MDI were likely masked by rainfall, thus further evaluation of MDI is recommended under conditions of less applied water than LEPA or LESA accompanied by low rainfall. The other benefits of MDI were found in reduction of wheel-track rutting and ease of carrying out fertigation.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 21
页数:11
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], IRRIGATION MANAGEMEN
[2]  
[Anonymous], KANS RANK US AGR
[3]  
[Anonymous], KANS FARM FACTS
[4]  
[Anonymous], P 30 ANN SAS US GROU
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2012, MANAGEMENT DRIP TRIC
[6]  
[Anonymous], KANS AGR
[7]   Cumulative deficit irrigation effects on corn biomass and grain yield under two tillage systems [J].
Benjamin, J. G. ;
Nielsen, D. C. ;
Vigil, M. F. ;
Mikha, M. M. ;
Calderon, F. .
AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2015, 159 :107-114
[8]  
Cai XM, 2003, COMP ASSESS WAT MAN, V1, P163, DOI 10.1079/9780851996691.0163
[9]   Effect of water stress at different development stages on vegetative and reproductive growth of corn [J].
Çakir, R .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2004, 89 (01) :1-16
[10]   BLACK LAYER AND GRAIN MATURITY IN CORN [J].
DAYNARD, TB ;
DUNCAN, WG .
CROP SCIENCE, 1969, 9 (04) :473-&