Community support for campus approaches to sustainable energy use: The role of "town-gown" relationships

被引:21
作者
McComas, Katherine A. [1 ]
Stedman, Richard [1 ]
Hart, P. Sol [2 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Dept Commun, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[2] American Univ, Washington, DC 20016 USA
关键词
Fairness; Community engagement; Decision-making; PROCEDURAL JUSTICE; ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE; WIND POWER; FAIRNESS; RISK; PERCEPTIONS; UNIVERSITY; VOICE; COMMUNICATION; PERSPECTIVE;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2011.01.045
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Across the United States, universities are grappling with challenges associated with adopting approaches to more sustainable energy use. One approach has been to develop energy-related projects in their local, host communities. Because host communities can play a major role in the successful planning and implementation of these projects, understanding the factors relating to their support is important. Building on research that suggests that procedural fairness is one such key factor, this study examines community members' support of six approaches a local university could implement to work towards a goal of carbon neutrality. The results of a mail survey (N=677) found that perceived fairness of campus decision makers was significantly related to community support for the proposed approaches; however, beliefs about the efficacy of the different approaches to address challenges associated with climate change had the strongest relationship with support. The results also suggest that residents prefer changes in the energy infrastructure, such as the development of wind power, over the purchase of carbon offsets. We discuss the results in terms of actions that universities may take to foster community engagement in decision-making for university-sponsored sustainable energy projects. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2310 / 2318
页数:9
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
*AM COLL U, 2010, PRES CLIM COMM
[2]   Using risk communication to disclose the outcome of a participatory decision-making process: Effects on the perceived acceptability of risk-policy decision [J].
Arvai, JL .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2003, 23 (02) :281-289
[3]  
Bies RJ, 2005, HANDBOOK OF ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE, P85
[4]  
BIES RobertJ., 1986, Research on negotiation in organizations, P43, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1559-1816.2004.TB02581.X
[5]   Trust, respect, and the psychology of political engagement [J].
Boeckmann, RJ ;
Tyler, TR .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 32 (10) :2067-2088
[6]   Gown and town: The university and the city in Europe, 1200-2000 [J].
Brockliss, L .
MINERVA, 2000, 38 (02) :147-170
[7]   Town-gown relationships: Exploring university-community engagement from the perspective of community members [J].
Bruning, Stephen D. ;
McGrew, Shea ;
Cooper, Mark .
PUBLIC RELATIONS REVIEW, 2006, 32 (02) :125-130
[8]  
CHAISSON B, 2009, ITHACA TIMES IT 0722
[9]   Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research [J].
Colquitt, JA ;
Conlon, DE ;
Wesson, MJ ;
Porter, COLH ;
Ng, KY .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 86 (03) :425-445
[10]   On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure [J].
Colquitt, JA .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 86 (03) :386-400