Overview of pharmacologic agents for acid suppression in critically ill patients

被引:30
作者
Welage, LS [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Coll Pharm, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
cimetidine; critical illness; dosage; dosage forms; drug interactions; gastrointestinal drugs; kidney failure; mechanism of action; pharmacodynamics; pharmacokinetics; tolerance; toxicity;
D O I
10.1093/ajhp/62.10_Supplement_2.S4
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Purpose. The physiology of acid secretion, rationale and goals for acid suppression in critically ill patients, and mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of histamine H-2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs) and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are discussed. Summary. Acid-suppressant therapy may be used in critically ill patients to prevent stress-related mucosal disease or the recurrence of peptic ulcer bleeding. The intragastric pH goal is 3.5-4.5 and 6 or higher, respectively. H2RAs block only one of three pathways in acid secretion and provide less potent acid suppression than PPIs, which block the final common pathway in acid secretion. In addition, tolerance that occurs with H2RAs does not occur with PPIs. All PPIs work in a similar manner, but differences exist in the pharmacokinetic profiles and binding to the proton pump; the clinical relevance of these differences remains de-bated. The safety profiles of H2RAs and PPIs are similar; however, the H(2)RA dose, but not the PPI dose, must be adjusted for patients with renal dysfunction. The risk of drug interactions mediated by cytochrome P-450 enzymes is lower with PPIs than with cimetidine, an H(2)RA. Several new PPI dosage forms have been introduced, facilitating drug administration in the critical care setting. Conclusion. Both H2RAs and PPIs are safe agents to use for providing acid suppression in critically ill patients, but PPIs offer several potential advantages over H2RAs.
引用
收藏
页码:S4 / S10
页数:7
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [1] Pharmacokinetics, metabolism and interactions of acid pump inhibitors - Focus on omeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazole
    Andersson, T
    [J]. CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 1996, 31 (01) : 9 - 28
  • [2] Pharmacokinetics and effect an caffeine metabolism of the proton pump inhibitors, omeprazole, lansoprazole, and pantoprazole
    Andersson, T
    Holmberg, J
    Röhss, K
    Walan, A
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1998, 45 (04) : 369 - 375
  • [3] Drug interaction studies with esomeprazole, the (S)-isomer of omeprazole
    Andersson, T
    Hassan-Alin, M
    Hasselgren, G
    Röhss, K
    [J]. CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 2001, 40 (07) : 523 - 537
  • [4] Pharmacokinetic studies with esomeprazole, the (S)-isomer of omeprazole
    Andersson, T
    Hassan-Alin, M
    Hasselgren, G
    Röhss, K
    Weidolf, L
    [J]. CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 2001, 40 (06) : 411 - 426
  • [5] *ASTR LP, 2004, NEX PACK INS
  • [6] *ASTR LP, 2003, PRIL PACK INS
  • [7] STRESS-RELATED MUCOSAL DAMAGE - REVIEW OF DRUG-THERAPY
    BRUEGGE, WFV
    PEURA, DA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1990, 12 : S35 - S40
  • [8] Stability of suspension formulations of lansoprazole and omeprazole stored in amber-colored plastic oral syringes
    DiGiacinto, JL
    Olsen, KM
    Bergman, KL
    Hole, EB
    [J]. ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2000, 34 (05) : 600 - 605
  • [9] GASTRODUODENAL MOTILITY IN MECHANICALLY VENTILATED CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS - A MANOMETRIC STUDY
    DIVE, A
    MOULART, M
    JONARD, P
    JAMART, J
    MAHIEU, P
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1994, 22 (03) : 441 - 447
  • [10] Dubois A, 1999, CLIN PRACTICE GASTRO, P180