Dentomaxillofacial radiology in Australia and dentist satisfaction with radiology reports

被引:4
|
作者
Selim, D. G. [1 ]
Sexton, C. [1 ]
Monsour, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Dent, Herston, Qld, Australia
关键词
Dentomaxillofacial radiology; imaging; oral and maxillofacial radiology; radiology; reporting; BEAM COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1111/adj.12642
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR) is comprised of the smallest cohort of specialists in Australia. A survey was undertaken to assess awareness of DMFR, radiology reporting and referring protocols as well as dental practitioners' satisfaction with their radiology reporting arrangements. Methods An original online survey created using Checkbox(dagger) was sent to dental practitioners. The survey was promoted on Australian-based dental Facebook forums and emailed to targeted members via Australian professional dental associations. Results A total of 399 responses were received, with over 80% of respondents aware of DMFR as a specialty. Approximately 40% of practitioners were self-reporting their imaging. There was correlation between increased satisfaction with external reporting and utilization of DMFR services and decreased satisfaction with medical radiology services. More than 90% of general dentists and greater than 85% of dental specialists prefer DMFR reports to medical radiology reports. Approximately 80% of practitioners believed that their satisfaction would change positively if they had access to a DMFR report. Conclusion The research indicates a high degree of self-reporting or non-reporting by dental practitioners. There is low satisfaction with external reporting performed by Medical Radiologists primarily due to a lack of dental knowledge or detail and a preference for DMF Radiology reports.
引用
收藏
页码:402 / 413
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Trends in dentomaxillofacial radiology
    Kamburoglu, Kivanc
    WORLD JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2025, 17 (01):
  • [2] Artificial intelligence in dentomaxillofacial radiology
    Gokdeniz, Seyide Tugce
    Kamburoglu, Kivanc
    WORLD JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 14 (03):
  • [3] Expanding a radiology lexicon using contextual patterns in radiology reports
    Percha, Bethany
    Zhang, Yuhao
    Bozkurt, Selen
    Rubin, Daniel
    Altman, Russ B.
    Langlotz, Curtis P.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2018, 25 (06) : 679 - 685
  • [4] Radiomics-Based Diagnosis in Dentomaxillofacial Radiology: A Systematic Review
    Tarakci, Ozge Donmez
    Kis, Hatice Cansu
    Amasya, Hakan
    Ozturk, Irem
    Karahan, Emre
    Orhan, Kaan
    JOURNAL OF IMAGING INFORMATICS IN MEDICINE, 2024,
  • [5] Reject Rates of Radiographic Images in Dentomaxillofacial Radiology: A Literature Review
    Yeung, Andy Wai Kan
    Wong, Natalie Sui Miu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (15)
  • [6] Cone beam computed tomography in dentomaxillofacial radiology: a two-decade overview
    Gaeta-Araujo, Hugo
    Alzoubi, Tamara
    Vasconcelos, Karla de Faria
    Orhan, Kaan
    Pauwels, Ruben
    Casselman, Jan W.
    Jacobs, Reinhilde
    DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 49 (08)
  • [7] Can ChatGPT write radiology reports?
    Biswas, Som
    Khan, Salman
    Awal, Sandeep Singh
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2024, 7 (01) : 102 - 106
  • [8] Incorporating intelligence into structured radiology reports
    Kahn, Charles E., Jr.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2014: PACS AND IMAGING INFORMATICS: NEXT GENERATION AND INNOVATIONS, 2014, 9039
  • [9] Can ChatGPT write radiology reports?
    Som Biswas
    Salman Khan
    Sandeep Singh Awal
    Chinese Journal of Academic Radiology, 2024, 7 : 102 - 106
  • [10] What radiology residents need to know about radiology reports beyond technical aspects
    Garcia Santos, J. M.
    RADIOLOGIA, 2022, 64 : 179 - 185