The tolerable waiting time: A generalized Pareto distribution model with empirical investigation

被引:2
作者
Xiong, Hui [1 ]
Ma, Lu [2 ]
Ning, Mengxi [3 ]
Zhao, Xu [4 ]
Weng, Jinxian [5 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Mech Engn, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, MOT Key Lab Transport Ind Big Data Applicat Techn, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[3] SWUFE, Tianfu Coll, Dept Adm, Mianyang 621000, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Univ Technol, Coll Appl Sci, Beijing 100124, Peoples R China
[5] Shanghai Maritime Univ, Coll Transport & Commun, Shanghai 201306, Peoples R China
基金
北京市自然科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Waiting time; Generalized Pareto distribution; Signalized intersection; Parameter estimation; EXTREME-VALUE ANALYSIS; QUANTILE ESTIMATION; PEDESTRIANS BEHAVIOR; CROSSING BEHAVIOR; RISK; PARAMETER; PROBABILITY; ESTIMATORS; CROSSWALKS; MOMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.cie.2019.106019
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
In China, it is more common for pedestrians than vehicles to disobey traffic signals, resulting in a high risk of pedestrian-vehicle accidents. Pedestrian waiting time are the most critical indicator of the tendency to violate traffic signals. A statistical analysis based on 4027 field-collected samples showed that the length of time that pedestrians are prepared to wait depends on the type of pedestrian traffic signal. Compared to a countdown-type signal, pedestrians were more likely to violate conventional-type signals. Furthermore, pedestrians were willing to wait longer during peak hours than during off-peak hours. There were no significant differences between the waiting times of male and female travelers. To predict pedestrian waiting time, we propose a generalized Pareto distribution (GPD) model and calibrated it based on our field data. Monte Carlo simulations showed that the maximum likelihood estimation (MLE), Bayesian MLE (BMLE), and weighted nonlinear least squares (WNLS) models are the best methods for estimating the scale and shape parameters of the GPD model. Several empirical results were output from the models. For example, at countdown-type signals, the 85th quantile of the tolerable waiting time in off-peak and peak hours was 51.5 and 54.4 s, respectively; the respective values for males and females were 55.4 and 55.0 s. At conventional signals, the tolerable waiting time was approximately 42.5 s. These findings are useful for the planning, design, and operation of pedestrian facilities.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, GLOB STAT REP ROAD S
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Statistics of Extremes
[3]   Robust and efficient fitting of the generalized Pareto distribution with actuarial applications in view [J].
Brazauskas, Vytaras ;
Kleefeld, Andreas .
INSURANCE MATHEMATICS & ECONOMICS, 2009, 45 (03) :424-435
[4]   The impact of waiting time and other factors on dangerous pedestrian crossings and violations at signalized intersections: A case study in Montreal [J].
Brosseau, Marilyne ;
Zangenehpour, Sohail ;
Saunier, Nicolas ;
Miranda-Moreno, Luis .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2013, 21 :159-172
[5]   Shorten pedestrians' perceived waiting time: The effect of tempo and pitch in audible pedestrian signals at red phase [J].
Cao, Yi ;
Zhuang, Xiangling ;
Ma, Guojie .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2019, 123 :336-340
[6]  
Cohen J., 1955, J. Oper. Res. Soc, V6, P120, DOI [DOI 10.1057/JORS.1955.15, 10.2307/3007711]
[7]  
Coles S, 2001, INTRO STAT MODELLING
[8]  
CRTASR, 2011, CHIN ROAD ACC STAT R
[9]   Wind speed prediction for wind farm applications by Extreme Value Theory and Copulas [J].
D'Amico, Guglielmo ;
Petroni, Filippo ;
Prattico, Flavio .
JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2015, 145 :229-236
[10]   Walk or wait? An empirical analysis of street crossing decisions [J].
Das, S ;
Manski, CF ;
Manuszak, MD .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMETRICS, 2005, 20 (04) :529-548