Dentoskeletal and soft tissue changes associated with miniscrew anchorage in customized lingual orthodontics

被引:3
作者
Liu, Dawei [1 ]
Li, Jing [1 ]
Lei, Feifei [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Xuedong [1 ]
Zhou, Yanheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Sch & Hosp Stomatol, Dept Orthodont, 22 Zhongguancun Nandajie, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[2] Sunny Dent Clin, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 对外科技合作项目(国际科技项目);
关键词
Aesthetic orthodontics; customized lingual orthodontics; soft tissue changes; miniscrew anchorage; maximum anchorage; cephalometry; molar; treatment outcome; CLASS-II MALOCCLUSION; LIP POSITIONS; ARCH WIDTH; SKELETAL; NONEXTRACTION; EXTRACTION; APPLIANCES; RETRACTION;
D O I
10.1177/0300060518795541
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objectives The goal of this study was to analyze skeletal, dental, and soft tissue changes of patients treated with customized lingual systems and to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of miniscrew anchorage. Methods Nine upper first premolar extraction patients who were treated with customized lingual appliances were included in this study. Miniscrews were used for reinforcement of molar anchorage. Cephalometric films and study models were obtained before treatment (T1), after alignment (T2), and after treatment (T3). Treatment effects were analyzed by cephalometric radiographs and study models. Results The upper anterior teeth were retracted significantly at T2 and T3 (4.414.14 mm and 5.51 +/- 2.48 mm, respectively). During space closure, the upper first molars showed slight mesial movement (1.50 +/- 1.97 mm). The intercanine width of the upper arch increased at T2 (1.59 +/- 1.81mm), but decreased at T3 (0.11 +/- 1.00 mm). The sella-nasion-A, A-nasion-B, and mandibular plane angles were not significantly changed at T3. The upper lip showed continuous retraction at both T2 and T3 (1.40 +/- 1.46 mm and 2.32 +/- 2.48 mm, respectively). Conclusions By using miniscrew anchorage for lingual orthodontics, patients' dental and soft tissue changes considerably improved and molar anchorage was reinforced.
引用
收藏
页码:84 / 95
页数:12
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Aksu M, 2005, ANGLE ORTHOD, V75, P948
[2]   Differences in psychological traits between lingual and labial orthodontic patients: Perfectionism, body image, and the impact of dental esthetics [J].
Bellot-Arcis, Carlos ;
Ferrer-Molina, Marcela ;
Carrasco-Tornero, Angel ;
Maria Montiel-Company, Jose ;
Manuel Almerich-Silla, Jose .
ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2015, 85 (01) :58-63
[3]   Ethnic differences in upper lip response to incisor retraction [J].
Brock, RA ;
Taylor, RW ;
Buschang, PH ;
Behrents, RG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2005, 127 (06) :683-691
[4]  
Conley RS, 2006, ANGLE ORTHOD, V76, P59
[5]   CEPHALOMETRIC APPRAISAL OF PATIENTS TREATED WITH FIXED LINGUAL ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES - HISTORIC REVIEW AND ANALYSIS OF CASES [J].
FULMER, DT ;
KUFTINEC, MM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1989, 95 (06) :514-520
[6]   Arch width after extraction and nonextraction treatment [J].
Gianelly, AA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2003, 123 (01) :25-28
[7]   COMPARISON OF TREATMENT EFFECTS WITH LABIAL AND LINGUAL FIXED APPLIANCES [J].
GORMAN, JC ;
SMITH, RJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1991, 99 (03) :202-209
[8]   Comparison of craniofacial characteristics of typical Chinese and Caucasian young adults [J].
Gu, Yan ;
McNamara, James A., Jr. ;
Sigler, Lauren M. ;
Baccetti, Tiziano .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2011, 33 (02) :205-211
[9]   Effects of retraction of anterior teeth and initial soft tissue variables on lip changes in Japanese adults [J].
Hayashida, Hiroko ;
Ioi, Hideki ;
Nakata, Shunsuke ;
Takahashi, Ichiro ;
Counts, Amy L. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2011, 33 (04) :419-426
[10]   Adult skeletal Class II high-angle case treated with a fully customized lingual bracket appliance [J].
Inami, Toru ;
Nakano, Yuko ;
Miyazawa, Ken ;
Tabuchi, Masako ;
Goto, Shigemi .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2016, 150 (04) :679-691