An ethical analysis of the phenomenon of misconduct in research

被引:4
作者
Forsman, B [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lund, Dept Med Eth, SE-22222 Lund, Sweden
关键词
D O I
10.1080/028418699431889
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Ethical problems of research misconduct can be viewed in many ways. The main issue at stake is the reliability of what is presented as scientific facts. If we cannot trust research findings, the consequences can be fatal for all affected parties. There are several actors in the context of research integrity and misconduct, especially the individual scientist and the scientific community. The honesty of scientists is important but this in itself is not a sufficient condition for research integrity. We need guidelines and rules. Researchers accused of misconduct must be guaranteed legal security. A closed definition of scientific misconduct sterns to be the best one for protecting the legal security, but on the other hand, an open definition is better for the protection of science. There is a gap between ethics and law in the view of research misconduct. Some actions that are regarded as unethical are quite well within the law. In order to deal with real cases of alleged research misconduct, there must be a way of closing this gap.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 110
页数:4
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
Brand C., 1996, G FACTOR GEN INTELLI
[2]  
Clever L, 1997, NEW ENGL J MED, V336, P309
[3]  
Commission on Research Integrity, 1995, INT MISC RES REP COM
[4]  
FORSMAN B, 1997, FORSKNINGSETIK INTRO
[5]   Eugenics and the new genetics in Britain: Examining contemporary professionals' accounts [J].
Kerr, A ;
Cunningham-Burley, S ;
Amos, A .
SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES, 1998, 23 (02) :175-198
[6]  
Merton R., 1973, SOCIOLOGY SCI
[7]  
Milgram S., 1974, OBEDIENCE AUTHORITY
[8]  
*NIH, 1992, GUID COND RES INTR R
[9]  
*OFF RES INT, 1993, OFF RES INT INTRO
[10]  
RADAHL E, 1998, UNIVERSITETSLARAREN, V10, P8