Computer-assisted analysis of public discourse: a case study of the precautionary principle in the US and UK press

被引:11
作者
Kirilenko, Andrei [1 ]
Stepchenkova, Svetlana [2 ]
Romsdahl, Rebecca [1 ]
Mattis, Kristine [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Dakota, Dept Earth Syst Sci & Policy, Grand Forks, ND 58202 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Dept Tourism Recreat & Sport Management, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
关键词
Content analysis; Factor analysis; Textual data; Prestige press; Precautionary principle; TEXT ANALYSIS; NEWSPAPER COVERAGE; DESTINATION IMAGE; NEWS; METHODOLOGY; BALANCE; RUSSIA; MODELS;
D O I
10.1007/s11135-010-9383-z
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Content analysis of newspaper publications has become a major scientific method of the analysis of public discourse. Within the framework of content analysis, we suggest a computer-assisted method to extract the most important topics of this discourse in an objective, quantifiable manner. The method combines frequency and proximity analysis of the text population, selection of the key words, text modification based on a key word dictionary, factor analysis of the modified text population, and factor interpretation. We illustrate the concept by applying the method to study the major topics discussed in the US and UK prestige press that relate to the precautionary principle. Precautionary principle is a concept of preventing environmental damage under scientific uncertainty. The analysis demonstrates the difference between the major topics of the precautionary principle discussion in the US and UK press. In the US, it revolves around an emphasis on the action on global warming, international trade on genetically modified food, environment pollution, the risks of new technologies, and cost-benefit analysis (CBA). In the UK, the major discussion topics include threats to agriculture and farmers, climate change economics, national and EU regulations, and commercial fishing. Other discussion topics, such as health and pollution, water safety regulations, meat safety and trade, and GMO regulations are shared between the countries. The US sample demonstrates more negative views towards the precautionary principle, which is presented as a threat to the US economic interests.
引用
收藏
页码:501 / 522
页数:22
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]  
Ackerman F., 2008, POISONED PENNIES ECO
[2]   Text analysis software: Commonalities, differences and limitations: The results of a review [J].
Alexa, M ;
Zuell, C .
QUALITY & QUANTITY, 2000, 34 (03) :299-321
[3]   How Interest groups attempt to shape public opinion with competing news frames [J].
Andsager, JL .
JOURNALISM & MASS COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY, 2000, 77 (03) :577-592
[4]   Desirability of differences in destinations [J].
Andsager, JL ;
Drzewiecka, JA .
ANNALS OF TOURISM RESEARCH, 2002, 29 (02) :401-421
[5]  
[Anonymous], MEDIA BOOK
[6]  
[Anonymous], J CHINA TOURISM RES
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2000, COMM COMM PREC PRINC
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1992, Rio Declaration on Environment and Development
[9]  
Ashford Nicholas., 2007, Implementing the Precautionary Principle: Approaches from the Nordic Countries, the EU and the United States, P352
[10]  
Beder Sharon., 2006, ENV PRINCIPLES POLIC