Survival of children and adolescents with intellectual disability following gastrostomy insertion

被引:4
作者
Wong, K. [1 ]
Glasson, E. J. [1 ]
Jacoby, P. [1 ]
Srasuebkul, P. [2 ]
Forbes, D. [3 ]
Ravikumara, M. [4 ]
Wilson, A. [1 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Bourke, J. [1 ]
Trollor, J. [2 ]
Leonard, H. [1 ]
Nagarajan, L. [1 ,8 ]
Downs, J. [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Telethon Kids Inst, Ctr Child Hlth Res, POB 855, Perth, WA 6872, Australia
[2] UNSW Sydney, Sch Psychiat, Dept Dev Disabil Neuropsychiat, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Western Australia, Med Sch, Perth, WA, Australia
[4] Perth Childrens Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Perth, WA, Australia
[5] Perth Childrens Hosp, Dept Resp Med, Perth, WA, Australia
[6] Univ Western Australia, Sch Paediat, Perth, WA, Australia
[7] Curtin Univ, Sch Physiotherapy & Exercise Sci, Perth, WA, Australia
[8] Perth Childrens Hosp, Dept Neurol, Childrens Neurosci Serv, Perth, WA, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
enteral feeding; mortality; nutrition; paediatric; survival; PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY; DEVELOPMENTAL-DISABILITY; WESTERN-AUSTRALIA; CEREBRAL-PALSY; DATA LINKAGE; OUTCOMES; MORTALITY; EVENT; BIAS;
D O I
10.1111/jir.12729
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
Background Positive health outcomes have been observed following gastrostomy insertion in children with intellectual disability, which is being increasingly used at younger ages to improve nutritional intake. This study investigated the effect of gastrostomy insertion on survival of children with severe intellectual disability. Methods We used linked disability and health data of children and adolescents who were born in Western Australia between 1983 and 2009 to compare survival of individuals with severe intellectual disability by exposure to gastrostomy status. For those born in 2000-2009, we employed propensity score matching to adjust for confounding by indication. Effect of gastrostomy insertion on survival was compared by pertinent health and sociodemographic risk factors. Results Compared with children born in the 1980s-1990s, probability of survival following first gastrostomy insertion for those born in 2000-2009 was higher (2 years: 94% vs. 83%). Mortality risk was higher in cases than that in their matched controls (hazard ratio 2.9, 95% confidence interval 1.1, 7.3). The relative risk of mortality (gastrostomy vs. non-gastrostomy) may have differed by sex, birthweight and time at first gastrostomy insertion. Respiratory conditions were a common immediate or underlying cause of death among all children, particularly among those undergoing gastrostomy insertion. Conclusions Whilst gastrostomy insertion was associated with lower survival rates than children without gastrostomy, survival improved with time, and gastrostomy afforded some protection for the more vulnerable groups, and earlier use appears beneficial to survival. Specific clinical data that may be used to prioritise the need for gastrostomy insertion may be responsible for the survival differences observed.
引用
收藏
页码:497 / 511
页数:15
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Obstet Gynecol, V122, P1139, DOI 10.1097/01.AOG.0000437385.88715.4a
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, AUSTR DEM STAT
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, REG POP GROWTH AUSTR
[4]   Influence of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Children [J].
Aumar, Madeleine ;
Lalanne, Arnaud ;
Guimber, Dominique ;
Coopman, Stephanie ;
Turck, Dominique ;
Michaud, Laurent ;
Gottrand, Frederic .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2018, 197 :116-120
[5]   The use of propensity score methods with survival or time-to-event outcomes: reporting measures of effect similar to those used in randomized experiments [J].
Austin, Peter C. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2014, 33 (07) :1242-1258
[6]   A comparison of 12 algorithms for matching on the propensity score [J].
Austin, Peter C. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2014, 33 (06) :1057-1069
[7]  
*AUSTR HLTH MIN, 2015, AB TORR STRAIT ISL H
[8]  
Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2016, 2033055001 CENSUS PO
[9]   Data Linkage: Canadian and Australian Perspectives on a Valuable Methodology for Intellectual and Developmental Disability Research [J].
Balogh, Robert ;
Leonard, Helen ;
Bourke, Jenny ;
Brameld, Kate ;
Downs, Jenny ;
Hansen, Michele ;
Glasson, Emma ;
Lin, Elizabeth ;
Lloyd, Meghann ;
Lunsky, Yona ;
O'Donnell, Melissa ;
Shooshtari, Shahin ;
Wong, Kingsley ;
Krahn, Gloria .
INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2019, 57 (05) :439-462
[10]  
Bebbington Ami, 2013, BMJ Open, V3, DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002356