Biomechanical Evaluation of Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy Fixation Techniques in Mandibular Setback

被引:3
作者
Chen, Michael Y. C. [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Yi-Fan [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Heng-Li [1 ,3 ]
Hsu, Jui-Ting [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] China Med Univ, Sch Dent, Taichung 404, Taiwan
[2] China Med Univ & Hosp, Dept Dent, Taichung 404, Taiwan
[3] Asia Univ, Dept Bioinformat & Med Engn, Taichung 413, Taiwan
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2020年 / 10卷 / 09期
关键词
sagittal split ramus osteotomy; fixation; bone plate; screw; RIGID INTERNAL-FIXATION; IN-VITRO EVALUATION; BICORTICAL SCREWS; STABILITY; SURGERY;
D O I
10.3390/app10093031
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the biomechanical behavior of internal fixation techniques in bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomies (BSSROs) for mandibular setback. Artificial polyurethane mandibles were used in this study. The distal segment of the mandible was repositioned in an 8-mm setback position. All mandibles were divided into three groups: Group 1 had a straight plate with a four-hole monocortical fixation, Group 2 had a curved plate with a four-hole monocortical fixation, and Group 3 had a three-inverted L-type bicortical screw fixation. Vertical loads were applied on the incisal edge by a material testing system. The resistance force at 1, 3, 5, and 10 mm of displacement was analyzed. From the experimental results, Group 1 showed significantly lower results than Groups 2 and 3. No significant difference was observed between Groups 2 and 3 at 1, 3, and 5 mm of displacement. However, at 10 mm of displacement, the resistance force of Group 3 was greater than that of Group 2. For BSSROs, this study concluded that curved plate fixation exhibited the same rigidity as the inverted-L bicortical screw fixation did at <= 5 mm displacement.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[11]  
Hoffmannova J, 2008, Prague Med Rep, V109, P286
[12]  
Ingeborg M., 2018, WATZKE MANDIBULAR SU, V3, P317
[13]   Changes in bite force after orthognathic surgical correction of mandibular prognathism: a systematic review [J].
Islam, I. ;
Lim, A. A. T. ;
Wong, R. C. W. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2017, 46 (06) :746-755
[14]  
Jacks SC, 1998, J ORAL MAXIL SURG, V56, P700, DOI 10.1016/S0278-2391(98)90799-6
[15]   Stability After Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy Advancement Surgery With Rigid Internal Fixation: A Systematic Review [J].
Joss, Christof Urs ;
Vassalli, Isabella Maria .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2009, 67 (02) :301-313
[16]  
Katz M.I., 1990, QUINTESSENCE INT, V21, P21
[17]   Orthognathic surgery and a tale of how three procedures came to be: A letter to the next generations of surgeons [J].
Obwegeser, Hugo L. .
CLINICS IN PLASTIC SURGERY, 2007, 34 (03) :331-+
[18]   In vitro comparison of biomechanical characteristics of sagittal split osteotomy fixation techniques [J].
Oezden, B. ;
Alkan, A. ;
Arici, S. ;
Erdem, E. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2006, 35 (09) :837-841
[19]   In vitro biomechanical comparison of six different fixation methods following 5-mm sagittal split advancement osteotomies [J].
Oguz, Y. ;
Watanabe, E. R. ;
Reis, J. M. ;
Spin-Neto, R. ;
Gabrielli, M. A. ;
Pereira-Filho, V. A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 44 (08) :984-988
[20]   Comparison of stability of 2.0 mm standard and 2.0 mm locking miniplate/screws for the fixation of sagittal split ramus osteotomy on sheep mandibles [J].
Oguz, Yener ;
Saglam, Haci ;
Dolanmaz, Dogan ;
Uckan, Sina .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2011, 49 (02) :135-137