A usability evaluation toolkit for In-Vehicle Information Systems (IVISs)

被引:52
作者
Harvey, Catherine [1 ]
Stanton, Neville A. [1 ]
Pickering, Carl A. [2 ]
McDonald, Mike [1 ]
Zheng, Pengjun [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Sch Civil Engn & Environm, Transportat Res Grp, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hants, England
[2] Jaguar Cars, Jaguar & Land Rover Tech Res, Ctr Engn, Coventry CV3 4LF, W Midlands, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Usability; Evaluation; In-Vehicle Information Systems; HUMAN ERROR IDENTIFICATION; HIERARCHICAL TASK-ANALYSIS; ERGONOMICS; USER; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.apergo.2010.09.013
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Usability must be defined specifically for the context of use of the particular system under investigation. This specific context of use should also be used to guide the definition of specific usability criteria and the selection of appropriate evaluation methods. There are four principles which can guide the selection of evaluation methods, relating to the information required in the evaluation, the stage at which to apply methods, the resources required and the people involved in the evaluation. This paper presents a framework for the evaluation of usability in the context of In-Vehicle Information Systems (IVISs). This framework guides designers through defining usability criteria for an evaluation, selecting appropriate evaluation methods and applying those methods. These stages form an iterative process of design evaluation redesign with the overall aim of improving the usability of IVISs and enhancing the driving experience, without compromising the safety of the driver. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd and The Ergonomics Society. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:563 / 574
页数:12
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]  
Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, 2006, STAT PRINC CRIT VER
[2]   Driver-Vehicle-Environment monitoring for on-board driver support systems: Lessons learned from design and implementation [J].
Amditis, Angelos ;
Pagle, Katia ;
Joshi, Somya ;
Bekiaris, Evangelos .
APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2010, 41 (02) :225-235
[3]   Subjective rating scales: science or art? [J].
Annett, J .
ERGONOMICS, 2002, 45 (14) :966-987
[4]  
Annett J., 2004, The Handbook of Task Analysis for Human-Computer Interaction, P67, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-44811-3_9
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2006, DRIVER WORKLOAD METR
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1994, USABILITY INSPECTION, DOI [10.5555/2821575, DOI 10.5555/2821575]
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2004, GUID INV DISPL SYST
[8]  
AU FTW, 2008, 9 AUSTR US INT C WOL
[9]   Using critical path analysis to model multimodal human-computer interaction [J].
Baber, C ;
Mellor, B .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER STUDIES, 2001, 54 (04) :613-636
[10]   Human error identification techniques applied to public technology: Predictions compared with observed use [J].
Baber, C ;
Stanton, NA .
APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 1996, 27 (02) :119-131