Potential of genotyping-by-sequencing for genomic selection in livestock populations

被引:92
作者
Gorjanc, Gregor [1 ]
Cleveland, Matthew A. [2 ]
Houston, Ross D. [1 ]
Hickey, John M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Roslin Inst & Royal Dick Sch Vet Studies, Easter Bush, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Genus Plc, Hendersonville, TN 37075 USA
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
IMPUTATION; PREDICTION; STRATEGIES; DISCOVERY; ACCURACY; DENSITY; DESIGN; DEPTH;
D O I
10.1186/s12711-015-0102-z
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Background: Next-generation sequencing techniques, such as genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS), provide alternatives to single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays. The aim of this work was to evaluate the potential of GBS compared to SNP array genotyping for genomic selection in livestock populations. Methods: The value of GBS was quantified by simulation analyses in which three parameters were varied: (i) genome-wide sequence read depth (x) per individual from 0.01x to 20x or using SNP array genotyping; (ii) number of genotyped markers from 3000 to 300 000; and (iii) size of training and prediction sets from 500 to 50 000 individuals. The latter was achieved by distributing the total available x of 1000x, 5000x, or 10 000x per genotyped locus among the varying number of individuals. With SNP arrays, genotypes were called from sequence data directly. With GBS, genotypes were called from sequence reads that varied between loci and individuals according to a Poisson distribution with mean equal to x. Simulated data were analyzed with ridge regression and the accuracy and bias of genomic predictions and response to selection were quantified under the different scenarios. Results: Accuracies of genomic predictions using GBS data or SNP array data were comparable when large numbers of markers were used and x per individual was similar to 1x or higher. The bias of genomic predictions was very high at a very low x. When the total available x was distributed among the training individuals, the accuracy of prediction was maximized when a large number of individuals was used that had GBS data with low x for a large number of markers. Similarly, response to selection was maximized under the same conditions due to increasing both accuracy and selection intensity. Conclusions: GBS offers great potential for developing genomic selection in livestock populations because it makes it possible to cover large fractions of the genome and to vary the sequence read depth per individual. Thus, the accuracy of predictions is improved by increasing the size of training populations and the intensity of selection is increased by genotyping a larger number of selection candidates.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Rapid SNP Discovery and Genetic Mapping Using Sequenced RAD Markers [J].
Baird, Nathan A. ;
Etter, Paul D. ;
Atwood, Tressa S. ;
Currey, Mark C. ;
Shiver, Anthony L. ;
Lewis, Zachary A. ;
Selker, Eric U. ;
Cresko, William A. ;
Johnson, Eric A. .
PLOS ONE, 2008, 3 (10)
[2]   Marker Density and Read Depth for Genotyping Populations Using Genotyping-by-Sequencing [J].
Beissinger, Timothy M. ;
Hirsch, Candice N. ;
Sekhon, Rajandeep S. ;
Foerster, Jillian M. ;
Johnson, James M. ;
Muttoni, German ;
Vaillancourt, Brieanne ;
Buell, C. Robin ;
Kaeppler, Shawn M. ;
de Leon, Natalia .
GENETICS, 2013, 193 (04) :1073-1081
[3]   Accurate whole human genome sequencing using reversible terminator chemistry [J].
Bentley, David R. ;
Balasubramanian, Shankar ;
Swerdlow, Harold P. ;
Smith, Geoffrey P. ;
Milton, John ;
Brown, Clive G. ;
Hall, Kevin P. ;
Evers, Dirk J. ;
Barnes, Colin L. ;
Bignell, Helen R. ;
Boutell, Jonathan M. ;
Bryant, Jason ;
Carter, Richard J. ;
Cheetham, R. Keira ;
Cox, Anthony J. ;
Ellis, Darren J. ;
Flatbush, Michael R. ;
Gormley, Niall A. ;
Humphray, Sean J. ;
Irving, Leslie J. ;
Karbelashvili, Mirian S. ;
Kirk, Scott M. ;
Li, Heng ;
Liu, Xiaohai ;
Maisinger, Klaus S. ;
Murray, Lisa J. ;
Obradovic, Bojan ;
Ost, Tobias ;
Parkinson, Michael L. ;
Pratt, Mark R. ;
Rasolonjatovo, Isabelle M. J. ;
Reed, Mark T. ;
Rigatti, Roberto ;
Rodighiero, Chiara ;
Ross, Mark T. ;
Sabot, Andrea ;
Sankar, Subramanian V. ;
Scally, Aylwyn ;
Schroth, Gary P. ;
Smith, Mark E. ;
Smith, Vincent P. ;
Spiridou, Anastassia ;
Torrance, Peta E. ;
Tzonev, Svilen S. ;
Vermaas, Eric H. ;
Walter, Klaudia ;
Wu, Xiaolin ;
Zhang, Lu ;
Alam, Mohammed D. ;
Anastasi, Carole .
NATURE, 2008, 456 (7218) :53-59
[4]   Population genomics based on low coverage sequencing: how low should we go? [J].
Buerkle, C. Alex ;
Gompert, Zachariah .
MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2013, 22 (11) :3028-3035
[5]   Fast and flexible simulation of DNA sequence data [J].
Chen, Gary K. ;
Marjoram, Paul ;
Wall, Jeffrey D. .
GENOME RESEARCH, 2009, 19 (01) :136-142
[6]   Practical implementation of cost-effective genomic selection in commercial pig breeding using imputation [J].
Cleveland, M. A. ;
Hickey, J. M. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2013, 91 (08) :3583-3592
[7]   Genomic Prediction in Maize Breeding Populations with Genotyping-by-Sequencing [J].
Crossa, Jose ;
Beyene, Yoseph ;
Kassa, Semagn ;
Perez, Paulino ;
Hickey, John M. ;
Chen, Charles ;
de los Campos, Gustavo ;
Burgueno, Juan ;
Windhausen, Vanessa S. ;
Buckler, Ed ;
Jannink, Jean-Luc ;
Lopez Cruz, Marco A. ;
Babu, Raman .
G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS, 2013, 3 (11) :1903-1926
[8]   Genome-wide genetic marker discovery and genotyping using next-generation sequencing [J].
Davey, John W. ;
Hohenlohe, Paul A. ;
Etter, Paul D. ;
Boone, Jason Q. ;
Catchen, Julian M. ;
Blaxter, Mark L. .
NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2011, 12 (07) :499-510
[9]   Genotyping-by-Sequencing (GBS): A Novel, Efficient and Cost-Effective Genotyping Method for Cattle Using Next-Generation Sequencing [J].
De Donato, Marcos ;
Peters, Sunday O. ;
Mitchell, Sharon E. ;
Hussain, Tanveer ;
Imumorin, Ikhide G. .
PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (05)
[10]   Toward genomic prediction from whole-genome sequence data: impact of sequencing design on genotype imputation and accuracy of predictions [J].
Druet, T. ;
Macleod, I. M. ;
Hayes, B. J. .
HEREDITY, 2014, 112 (01) :39-47