Who are online learning leaders? Piloting a leader identification method (LIM)

被引:15
作者
Kim, Min Kyu [1 ]
Wang, Yinying [2 ]
Ketenci, Tuba [3 ]
机构
[1] Georgia State Univ, Coll Educ & Human Dev 238, 30 Pryor St SW, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
[2] Georgia State Univ, Coll Educ & Human Dev 420, Educ Policy Studies, 30 Pryor St SW, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
[3] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Ind & Syst Engn, Acad Off, Groseclose Bldg,Suite 208, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
关键词
Asynchronous discussion; Learner engagement; Learner participation; Learning leadership; Online learning; Social network analysis; ASYNCHRONOUS ONLINE; TRANSACTIONAL LEADERSHIP; TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP; STUDENT ENGAGEMENT; COGNITIVE PRESENCE; ROLE ASSIGNMENT; PERFORMANCE; ANXIETY; ROLES; PEER;
D O I
10.1016/j.chb.2019.106205
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
An asynchronous online discussion forum has been a prevalent means of collaborative online learning. Yet, it remains challenging for instructors to identify who and how students emerge as learning leaders. To overcome this challenge, this study aims to: (a) conceptualizing learning leadership in the context of online asynchronous discussions, (b) proposing a Leader Identification Method (LIM), and (c) testing the proposed method by using empirical data on how learning leaders behave differently from their peers in terms of behavioral, cognitive, and emotional engagement. Assuming that learning leaders emerge from social interactions in online discussions and drawing on the literature on leadership and social network analysis, we conceptualized three types of learning leadership roles: full facilitator, transactional facilitator, and attractive facilitator. These leadership roles are assumed to be associated with learners' levels of engagement in behavior, cognition, and emotions. To that end, we developed the LIM that factors in learners' behavioral, cognitive, and emotional engagement. Using a case study method to test the LIM, we collected two cohorts' online interaction data, as well as the data on the cohorts' behavioral, cognitive, and emotional engagement. The results established the reliability and validity of the LIM. Specifically, compared to non-leaders, the learning leaders exerted more transformational leadership, higher cognitive engagement, and more frequent emotional expression. The LIM pave the foundation for identifying learning leadership and providing pedagogical support to foster learning leadership development in online collaboration.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 116 条