Epistemic Vulnerability

被引:8
作者
Johnson, Casey Rebecca [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Idaho, Dept Polit & Philosophy, Moscow, ID 83843 USA
关键词
Epistemic obligations; social epistemology; vulnerability; NO-CHILD-LEFT;
D O I
10.1080/09672559.2020.1796030
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
In developing her ethics of care, Eva Kittay discusses the vulnerability and voluntarism models of obligation. Kittay uses the vulnerability model to demonstrate that we have some obligations to care, even for those to whom we've made no promise or with whom we have no agreement. Kittay's primary interest is in ourmoralobligations. I use this distinction to propose a new way to understand ourepistemicobligations to one another. After explaining Kittay's models and their epistemic analogs, I use epistemic vulnerability to explain two cases.
引用
收藏
页码:677 / 691
页数:15
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1987, CAN J PHILOS
[2]  
[Anonymous], CANADIAN J ED ADM PO
[3]   Tracking Epistemic Violence, Tracking Practices of Silencing [J].
Dotson, Kristie .
HYPATIA-A JOURNAL OF FEMINIST PHILOSOPHY, 2011, 26 (02) :236-257
[4]  
Elgin C., 2017, TRUE ENOUGH, V14, P113
[5]  
Elgin CZ, 2018, ROUT STUD CONTEMP PH, P10
[6]  
Fricker M, 2007, EPISTEMIC INJUSTICE
[7]   What we owe each other, epistemologically speaking: ethico-political values in social epistemology [J].
Goldberg, Sanford C. .
SYNTHESE, 2020, 197 (10) :4407-4423
[8]  
Goodin R. E., 1986, Protecting the vulnerable: A Re -analysis of our Social Responsibilities
[9]  
Hursh D., 2007, RACE ETHNIC EDUC-UK, V10, P295, DOI DOI 10.1080/13613320701503264
[10]  
Johnson, 2019, OVERCOMING EPISTEMIC, P255