Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon for the Treatment of Drug-Eluting Stent Restenosis 3-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:89
|
作者
Kufner, Sebastian [1 ]
Cassese, Salvatore [1 ]
Valeskini, Marco [1 ]
Neumann, Franz-Josef [2 ]
Schulz-Schuepke, Stefanie [1 ,3 ]
Hoppmann, Petra [4 ]
Fusaro, Massimiliano [1 ]
Schunkert, Heribert [1 ,3 ]
Laugwitz, Karl-Ludwig [3 ,4 ]
Kastrati, Adnan [1 ,3 ]
Byrne, Robert A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Klin Herz & Kreislauferkrankungen, Deutsch Herzzentrum Munchen, D-80636 Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Herzzentrum Freiburg Bad Krozingen, Klin Kardiol & Angiol 2, Freiburg, Krozingen, Germany
[3] DZHK German Ctr Cardiovasc Res, Munich, Germany
[4] Tech Univ Munich, Med Klin 1, Klinikum Rechts Isar, D-80636 Munich, Germany
关键词
balloon angioplasty; drug-eluting stent restenosis; paclitaxel-eluting balloon; paclitaxel-eluting stent; ISAR-DESIRE; BARE-METAL; ANGIOPLASTY; IMPLANTATION; METAANALYSIS; ANGIOGRAPHY; INSIGHTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcin.2015.01.031
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES This study sought to investigate the long-term comparative efficacy and safety of paclitaxel-eluting balloon (PEB), paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES), or balloon angioplasty (BA) for the treatment of drug-eluting stent restenosis. BACKGROUND The optimal treatment of drug-eluting stent restenosis remains unknown. Although PEB has shown encouraging results, the long-term clinical efficacy and safety of PEB remains poorly defined. METHODS A total of 402 patients with clinically significant restenosis in limus-eluting stents were randomly assigned to receive PEB (n = 137), PES (n = 131), or BA (n = 134). For this analysis, PEB versus PES and PEB versus BA were compared. The primary efficacy and safety endpoints were target lesion revascularization and the composite of death or myocardial infarction. RESULTS At a median follow-up of 3 years, the risk of target lesion revascularization was comparable with PEB versus PES (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.46, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.91 to 2.33; p = 0.11) and lower with PEB versus BA (HR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.34 to 0.74; p < 0.001). The risk of death/myocardial infarction tended to be lower with PEB versus PES (HR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.28 to 1.07; p = 0.08), due to a lower risk of death (HR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.87; p = 0.02). The risk of death/myocardial infarction was similar with PEB versus BA (HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.46 to 2.0; p = 0.91). CONCLUSIONS At 3 years, the use of PEB as compared with PES to treat patients with limus-eluting stent restenosis has similar efficacy and safety. PEB remains superior to BA. The sustained efficacy without trade-off in safety supports the role of PEB as treatment option for patients with drug-eluting stent restenosis. (Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results: Drug Eluting Stent In-Stent Restenosis: 3 Treatment Approaches [ISAR-DESIRE 3]; NCT00987324) (C) 2015 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:877 / 884
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Paclitaxel-eluting balloon versus everolimus-eluting stent for treatment of drug-eluting stent restenosis
    Almalla, Mohammad
    Schroeder, Joerg
    Pross, Verena
    Marx, Nikolaus
    Hoffmann, Rainer
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2014, 83 (06) : 881 - 887
  • [2] A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Trial of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent for the Treatment of Drug-Eluting Stent In-Stent Restenosis Results From the PEPCAD China ISR Trial
    Xu, Bo
    Gao, Runlin
    Wang, Jian'an
    Yang, Yuejin
    Chen, Shaoliang
    Liu, Bin
    Chen, Fang
    Li, Zhanquan
    Han, Yaling
    Fu, Guosheng
    Zhao, Yelin
    Ge, Junbo
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2014, 7 (02) : 204 - 211
  • [3] Comparison of drug-eluting stents and drug-coated balloon for the treatment of drug-eluting coronary stent restenosis: A randomized RESTORE trial
    Wong, Yiu Tung Anthony
    Kang, Do-Yoon
    Lee, Jin Bae
    Rha, Seung-Woon
    Hong, Young Joon
    Shin, Eun-Seok
    Her, Sung-Ho
    Nam, Chang Wook
    Chung, Woo-Young
    Kim, Moo Hyun
    Lee, Cheol Hyun
    Lee, Pil Hyung
    Ahn, Jung-Min
    Kang, Soo-Jin
    Lee, Seung-Whan
    Kim, Young-Hak
    Lee, Cheol Whan
    Park, Seong-Wook
    Park, Duk-Woo
    Park, Seung-Jung
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2018, 197 : 35 - 42
  • [4] Paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter compared with drug eluting stent for drug-eluting stent restenosis in routine clinical practice
    Habara, Seiji
    Kadota, Kazushige
    Kanazawa, Takenori
    Ichinohe, Tahei
    Kubo, Shunsuke
    Hyodo, Yusuke
    Otsuru, Suguru
    Hasegawa, Daiji
    Tada, Takeshi
    Tanaka, Hiroyuki
    Fuku, Yasushi
    Goto, Tsuyoshi
    Mitsudo, Kazuaki
    EUROINTERVENTION, 2016, 11 (10) : 1098 - 1105
  • [5] A Randomized Comparison of Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stent for the Treatment of Any In-Stent Restenosis The DARE Trial
    Baan, Jan, Jr.
    Claessen, Bimmer E.
    Boerlage-van Dijk, Kirsten
    Vendrik, Jeroen
    van der Schaaf, Rene J.
    Meuwissen, Martijn
    van Royen, Niels
    Gosselink, A. T. Marcel
    van Wely, Marleen H.
    Dirkali, Atilla
    Arkenbout, E. Karin
    de Winter, Robbert J.
    Koch, Karel T.
    Sjauw, Krischan D.
    Beijk, Marcel A.
    Vis, M. Marije
    Wykrzykowska, Joanna J.
    Piek, Jan J.
    Tijssen, Jan G. P.
    Henriques, Jose P. S.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2018, 11 (03) : 275 - 283
  • [6] Analysis of the effect of paclitaxel-eluting stents and paclitaxel-eluting balloon in the treatment of in-stent restenosis
    Cheng, Jiangtao
    Gao, Chuanyu
    Liu, Yuhao
    Wang, Zhongmin
    Zheng, Xiaohui
    Qi, Datun
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2017, 30 (04) : 1521 - 1524
  • [7] Cutting balloon combined with paclitaxel-eluting balloon for treatment of in-stent restenosis
    Kong, Junying
    Hou, Jingbo
    Ma, Lijia
    Xing, Lei
    Jia, Haibo
    Liu, Huimin
    Zhang, Shaosong
    Yu, Bo
    Jang, Ik-Kyung
    ARCHIVES OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 2013, 106 (02) : 79 - 85
  • [8] Efficacy of Drug-Eluting Balloon in Patients with Bare-Metal or Drug-Eluting Stent Restenosis
    Berta, Balazs
    Jambrik, Zoltan
    Kohar, Krisztina
    Szabo, Gyorgy
    Ruzsa, Zoltan
    Molnar, Levente
    Barczi, Gyorgy
    Geller, Laszlo
    Becker, David
    Merkely, Bela
    HELLENIC JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 55 (05) : 369 - 377
  • [9] Comparative long-term efficacy and safety of two paclitaxel-coated balloons with different coating strategies for the treatment of drug-eluting coronary stent restenosis
    Koch, Tobias
    Lenz, Tobias
    Rheude, Tobias
    Cassese, Salvatore
    Xhepa, Erion
    Joner, Michael
    Mehilli, Julinda
    Schunkert, Heribert
    Kastrati, Adnan
    Kufner, Sebastian
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2024, 104 (05) : 909 - 917
  • [10] Comparison of drug-eluting balloon versus drug-eluting stent in patients with in-stent restenosis: Insight from randomized controlled trials
    Mamuti, Wahafu
    Ablimit, Alimjan
    Kelimu, Wumaierjiang
    Rao, Fang
    Jiamali, Abulimiti
    Zhang, Wei
    Pei, Xiaoli
    Zhang, Feng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 179 : 424 - 429