Support of the collaborative inquiry learning process: influence of support on task and team regulation

被引:69
作者
Saab, Nadira [1 ]
van Joolingen, Wouter [2 ]
van Hout-Wolters, Bernadette [3 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, NL-2333 AK Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Univ Twente, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Collaborative inquiry learning; cscl; Metacogntion; Task regulation; Team regulation; Support; Instruction; DISCOURSE PATTERNS; SCIENCE-EDUCATION; DISCOVERY; TECHNOLOGY; KNOWLEDGE; STUDENTS; PEER; METACOGNITION; EXPLANATION; ENVIRONMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s11409-011-9068-6
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Regulation of the learning process is an important condition for efficient and effective learning. In collaborative learning, students have to regulate their collaborative activities (team regulation) next to the regulation of their own learning process focused on the task at hand (task regulation). In this study, we investigate how support of collaborative inquiry learning can influence the use of regulative activities of students. Furthermore, we explore the possible relations between task regulation, team regulation and learning results. This study involves tenth-grade students who worked in pairs in a collaborative inquiry learning environment that was based on a computer simulation, Collisions, developed in the program SimQuest. Students of the same team worked on two different computers and communicated through chat. Chat logs of students from three different conditions are compared. Students in the first condition did not receive any support at all (Control condition). In the second condition, students received an instruction in effective communication, the RIDE rules (RIDE condition). In the third condition, students were, in addition to receiving the RIDE rules instruction, supported by the Collaborative Hypothesis Tool (CHT), which helped the students with formulating hypotheses together (CHT condition). The results show that students overall used more team regulation than task regulation. In the RIDE condition and the CHT condition, students regulated their team activities most often. Moreover, in the CHT condition the regulation of team activities was positively related to the learning results. We can conclude that different measures of support can enhance the use of team regulative activities, which in turn can lead to better learning results.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 23
页数:17
相关论文
共 84 条
[61]   Goal and self-evaluative influences during children's cognitive skill learning [J].
Schunk, DH .
AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 1996, 33 (02) :359-382
[62]   Scaffolding in technology-enhanced learning environments [J].
Sharma, Priya ;
Hannafin, Michael J. .
INTERACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS, 2007, 15 (01) :27-46
[63]  
Shute V.J., 1990, Interactive Learning Environments, V1, P51, DOI [10.1080/1049482900010104, DOI 10.1080/1049482900010104]
[64]   Computational modeling and analysis of knowledge sharing in collaborative distance learning [J].
Soller, A .
USER MODELING AND USER-ADAPTED INTERACTION, 2004, 14 (04) :351-381
[65]  
Soller A., 2005, INT J ARTIFICIAL INT, V15, P261
[66]   Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis [J].
Springer, L ;
Stanne, ME ;
Donovan, SS .
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 1999, 69 (01) :21-51
[67]  
Ton de Jong, 1992, Computer-Based Learning Environments and Problem Solving. Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop, P411
[68]   Mapping to know: The effects of representational guidance and reflective assessment on scientific inquiry [J].
Toth, EE ;
Suthers, DD ;
Lesgold, AM .
SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2002, 86 (02) :264-286
[69]  
van der Linden J., 2000, New Learning
[70]  
van Joolingen W., 1993, Simulation-Based Experiential Learning: Proceedings of the NATO advanced research workshop on the use of computer models for explication, analysis and experiential learning, P191, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-78539-9_14, 10.1007/987-3-642-78539-9, DOI 10.1007/987-3-642-78539-9]