Comparative Analysis of Clinical Outcome and Complications in Primary Versus Revision Adult Scoliosis Surgery

被引:53
作者
Cho, Samuel K. [2 ]
Bridwell, Keith H. [1 ]
Lenke, Lawrence G. [1 ]
Cho, Woojin [3 ]
Zebala, Lukas P. [1 ]
Pahys, Joshua M. [1 ]
Kang, Matthew M. [1 ]
Yi, Jin-Seok [1 ]
Baldus, Christine R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, St Louis, MO USA
[2] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed, New York, NY USA
[3] Univ Virginia, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Charlottesville, VA USA
关键词
clinical outcome; complications; primary surgery; revision surgery; SPINAL DEFORMITY PATIENTS; PERIOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; INSTRUMENTATION; FUSION; PATIENT; SACRUM; PSEUDOARTHROSIS; OSWESTRY;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0b013e31821f0126
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. A retrospective case comparison study. Objective. We compared clinical outcome and complications in adult patients who underwent primary (P) versus revision (R) scoliosis surgery. Summary of Background Data. There is a paucity of data comparing P versus R adult scoliosis patients with respect to their complication rates and clinical outcome. Methods. Assessment of 250 consecutive adult patients who underwent P versus R surgery for idiopathic or de novo scoliosis between 2002 and 2007, with a minimum 2-year follow-up, was performed. Results. There were 126 patients in the P group and 124 in the R group. Mean age at surgery (P = 51.2 vs. R = 51.6 years, P = 0.79), length of follow-up (P = 3.6 vs. R = 3.6 years, P = 0.94), comorbidities (P = 0.43), and smoking status (P = 0.98) were similar between the 2 groups. Body mass index (P = 25.5 vs. R = 27.4 kg/m(2), P = 0.01), number of final instrumented levels (P = 10.5 vs. R 12.1 levels, P = 0.00), fusion to the sacrum (P = 61.0% vs. R = 87.1%, P = 0.00), osteotomy (P = 14.3% vs. R = 54.9%, P = 0.00), length of surgery (P = 6.5 vs. R = 8.2 hours, P = 0.00), and estimated blood loss (P = 1072.1 vs. R = 1401.3 mL, P = 0.05) were different. Primary patients had significantly lower overall complications than revision patients (P = 45.2% vs. R = 58.2%, P = 0.042). Primary patients reported significantly higher preoperative and final clinical outcome measures in function, pain, and subscore SRS domains and ODI compared with revision patients (all P < 0.05). Patients older than 60 years of age, however, reported similar SRS and ODI scores between the 2 groups. The extent of surgical benefit patients received, that is, final minus preoperative score, was similar in all categories between the 2 groups. Conclusion. Adult patients undergoing primary scoliosis surgery had significantly lower overall complications compared with revision patients. Primary patients reported higher preoperative and final clinical outcome measures than revision patients, although this difference disappeared in older patients. The benefit of surgery was similar between the 2 groups.
引用
收藏
页码:393 / 401
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   HEALTH OUTCOME ASSESSMENT BEFORE AND AFTER ADULT DEFORMITY SURGERY - A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY [J].
ALBERT, TJ ;
PURTILL, J ;
MESA, J ;
MCINTOSH, T ;
BALDERSTON, RA .
SPINE, 1995, 20 (18) :2002-2004
[2]   Functional and radiographic outcomes after surgery for adult scoliosis using third-generation instrumentation techniques [J].
Ali, RM ;
Boachie-Adjei, O ;
Rawlins, BA .
SPINE, 2003, 28 (11) :1163-1169
[3]   Medical complications of surgical treatment of adult spinal deformity and how to avoid them [J].
Baron, Eli M. ;
Albert, Todd J. .
SPINE, 2006, 31 (19) :S106-S118
[4]   Adult scoliosis: Surgical indications, operative management, complications, and outcomes [J].
Bradford, DS ;
Tay, BKB ;
Hu, SS .
SPINE, 1999, 24 (24) :2617-2629
[5]   Complications and outcomes of pedicle subtraction osteotomies for fixed sagittal imbalance [J].
Bridwell, KH ;
Lewis, SJ ;
Edwards, C ;
Lenke, LG ;
Iffrig, TM ;
Berra, A ;
Baldus, C ;
Blanke, K .
SPINE, 2003, 28 (18) :2093-2101
[6]   The validity of the SRS-22 instrument in an adult spinal deformity population compared with the Oswestry and SF-12 - A study of response distribution, concurrent validity, internal consistency, and reliability [J].
Bridwell, KH ;
Cats-Baril, W ;
Harrast, J ;
Berven, S ;
Glassman, S ;
Farcy, JP ;
Horton, WC ;
Lenke, LG ;
Baldus, C ;
Radake, T .
SPINE, 2005, 30 (04) :455-461
[7]   Adjacent segment disease following lumbar/thoracolumbar fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation - A minimum 5-year follow-up [J].
Cheh, Gene ;
Bridwell, Keith H. ;
Lenke, Lawrence G. ;
Buchowski, Jacob M. ;
Daubs, Michael D. ;
Kim, Yongjung ;
Baldus, Christy .
SPINE, 2007, 32 (20) :2253-2257
[8]   Instrumentation-related complications of multilevel fusions for adult spinal deformity patients over age 65 - Surgical considerations and treatment option in patients with poor bone quality [J].
DeWald, Christopher J. ;
Stanley, Thomas .
SPINE, 2006, 31 (19) :S144-S151
[9]   Long adult deformity fusions to L5 and the sacrum - A matched cohort analysis [J].
Edwards, CC ;
Bridwell, KH ;
Patel, A ;
Rinella, AS ;
Berra, A ;
Lenke, LG .
SPINE, 2004, 29 (18) :1996-2005
[10]   Outcome and complications of long Fusions to the Sacrum in adult spine deformity - Luque-galveston, combined iliac and sacral screws, and sacral fixation [J].
Emami, A ;
Deviren, V ;
Berven, S ;
Smith, JA ;
Hu, SS ;
Bradford, DS .
SPINE, 2002, 27 (07) :776-786