A review of recent efforts at biological control of Caesalpinia decapetala (Roth) Alston (Fabaceae) in South Africa

被引:14
作者
Byrne, M. J. [1 ]
Witkowski, E. T. F. [1 ]
Kalibbala, F. N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Witwatersrand, Sch Anim Plant & Environm Sci, ZA-2050 Johannesburg, South Africa
关键词
Bruchinae; Mauritius thorn; seed bank; seed-feeding agent; Sulcobruchus subsuturalis; NATURAL ENEMY; ESTABLISHMENT; PARASITOIDS; GERMINATION; TEMPERATE; DYNAMICS; BIOTYPES; AGENTS; PLANTS;
D O I
10.4001/003.019.0201
中图分类号
Q96 [昆虫学];
学科分类号
摘要
A seed-feeding beetle, Sulcobruchus subsuturalis (Pic) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchinae), was released in South Africa in 1999 as a biological control agent against the invasive, leguminous, scrambling shrub Caesalpinia decapetala (Roth) Alston (Fabaceae). Despite being easy to rear in the laboratory and having been released in large numbers (>350 000) and widely distributed at many field sites, the beetle remains scarce where present and has failed to persist at many of the original release sites. Although eggs are oviposited readily on loose seeds in dishes, the few eggs that were found at release sites in the field were always on seeds still attached to pods hanging on plants. High levels of predation and parasitism were recorded in the field, which may be hindering population expansion by the beetle. Clarity about the taxonomic status of S. subsuturalis, and uncertainty as to the centre of origin of the weed, have led to suspicions that C. decapetala may exist as several biotypes, and that the local variety may not be a suitable host for the form of S. subsuturalis that has been imported into South Africa. These uncertainties should be addressed, together with additional efforts to determine what is happening to the agent in the field. Other phytophagous species from different feeding-guilds need to be investigated as potential biological control agents.
引用
收藏
页码:247 / 257
页数:11
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Biological control of mesquite (Prosopis species) (Fabaceae) in South Africa
    Zachariades, C.
    Hoffmann, J. H.
    Roberts, A. R.
    AFRICAN ENTOMOLOGY, 2011, 19 (02) : 402 - 415
  • [2] Current and future biological control efforts against Solanum mauritianum (Solanaceae) in South Africa
    Venter, N.
    Cowie, B. W.
    Olckers, T.
    Byrne, M. J.
    AFRICAN ENTOMOLOGY, 2021, 29 (03) : 875 - 888
  • [3] Biological control of Cactaceae in South Africa
    Paterson, I. D.
    Klein, H.
    Muskett, P. C.
    Griffith, T. C.
    Mayonde, S.
    Mofokeng, K.
    Mnqeta, Z.
    Venter, N.
    AFRICAN ENTOMOLOGY, 2021, 29 (03) : 713 - 734
  • [4] Biological control of Cactaceae in South Africa
    Paterson, I. D.
    Hoffmann, J. H.
    Klein, H.
    Mathenge, C. W.
    Neser, S.
    Zimmermann, H. G.
    AFRICAN ENTOMOLOGY, 2011, 19 (02) : 230 - 246
  • [5] Developments and prospects for biological control of Prosopis (Leguminosae) in South Africa
    Kleinjan, C. A.
    Hoffmann, J. H.
    Heystek, F.
    Ivey, P.
    Kistensamy, Y.
    AFRICAN ENTOMOLOGY, 2021, 29 (03) : 859 - 874
  • [6] Prioritisation of targets for weed biological control I: a review of existing prioritisation schemes and development of a system for South Africa
    Downey, Paul O.
    Paterson, Iain D.
    Canavan, Kim
    Hill, Martin P.
    BIOCONTROL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 31 (06) : 546 - 565
  • [8] Does climate constrain the spread of Anthonomus santacruzi, a biological control agent of Solanum mauritianum, in South Africa?
    Cowie, Blair W.
    Venturi, Giuseppe
    Witkowski, Ed T. F.
    Byrne, Marcus J.
    BIOLOGICAL CONTROL, 2016, 101 : 1 - 7
  • [9] The biological control of aquatic weeds in South Africa: Current status and future challenges
    Hill, Martin P.
    Coetzee, Julie
    BOTHALIA, 2017, 47 (02)
  • [10] Progress and prospects for the biological control of invasive alien grasses Poaceae) in South Africa
    Sutton, G.
    Bownes, A.
    Visser, V.
    Mapaura, A.
    Canavan, K.
    AFRICAN ENTOMOLOGY, 2021, 29 (03) : 837 - 858