Review of modelling energy transitions pathways with application to energy system flexibility

被引:97
作者
Bolwig, Simon [1 ]
Bazbauers, Gatis [2 ]
Klitkou, Antje [3 ]
Lund, Peter D. [4 ]
Blumberga, Andra [2 ]
Gravelsins, Armands [2 ]
Blumberga, Dagnija [2 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Engn Management, Prod Torvet 426, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
[2] Riga Tech Univ, Fac Power & Elect Engn, Inst Energy Syst & Environm, Azenes 12-1 St, LV-1048 Riga, Latvia
[3] Nord Inst Studies Innovat Res & Educ, POB 2815 Toyen, NO-0608 Oslo, Norway
[4] Aalto Univ, Sch Sci, POB 15100, FI-00076 Espoo, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Transitions pathways; Socio-technical factors; Sustainable energy systems; Energy system modelling; System dynamics modelling; Energy system flexibility; TEMPORAL DYNAMICS; LOCK-IN; SUSTAINABILITY; TECHNOLOGY; TYPOLOGY; EXPECTATIONS; MECHANISMS; SIMULATION; INNOVATION; ECONOMIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2018.11.019
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The aim of this review is to discuss how quantitative modelling of energy scenarios for sustainable energy transition pathways can be made more realistic by taking into account insights from the socio-technical and related literatures. The proposition is that an enriched modelling approach would focus not just on technology development and deployment, but also on feedback loops, learning processes, policy and governance, behavioural changes, the interlinkages between the energy sector and other economic sectors, and infrastructure development. The review discusses a range of socio-technical concepts with a view to how they can enrich the understanding and modelling of highly complex dynamic systems such as flexible energy systems with high shares of variable renewable energy. In this context, application of system dynamics modelling (SDM) for the analysis of energy transitions is also introduced by describing the differences between SDM and a traditional modelling approach that uses econometric and linear programming methods. A conceptual framework for this type of modelling is provided by using causal loop diagrams. The diagrams illustrate the endogenous approach of SDM - understanding and modelling the structure of a system, which is responsible for its dynamic behaviour. SDM can also capture the co-evolution of economic, policy, technology, and behavioural factors over sufficiently long time periods, which is necessary for the analysis of transition pathway dynamics. In this regard, the review summarises how socio-technical concepts can be approached in SDM and why they are relevant for the analysis of flexibility in energy systems. From a computational point of view, it could be beneficial to combine SDM with technologically detailed energy system optimization models and that could be a way forward for achieving more realistic, non-linear quantitative modelling of sustainable energy transitions.
引用
收藏
页码:440 / 452
页数:13
相关论文
共 76 条
  • [31] The Socio-Technical Dynamics of Low-Carbon Transitions
    Geels, Frank W.
    Sovacool, Benjamin K.
    Schwanen, Tim
    Sorrell, Steve
    [J]. JOULE, 2017, 1 (03) : 463 - 479
  • [32] Bridging analytical approaches for low-carbon transitions
    Geels, Frank W.
    Berkhout, Frans
    van Vuuren, Detlef P.
    [J]. NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2016, 6 (06) : 576 - 583
  • [33] The enactment of socio-technical transition pathways: A reformulated typology and a comparative multi-level analysis of the German and UK low-carbon electricity transitions (1990-2014)
    Geels, Frank W.
    Kern, Florian
    Fuchs, Gerhard
    Hinderer, Nele
    Kungl, Gregor
    Mylan, Josephine
    Neukirch, Mario
    Wassermann, Sandra
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2016, 45 (04) : 896 - 913
  • [34] Interactions of factors impacting implementation and sustainability of renewable energy sourced electricity
    Gottschamer, L.
    Zhang, Q.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 65 : 164 - 174
  • [35] Modelling energy production flexibility: system dynamics approach
    Gravelsins, Armands
    Bazbauers, Gatis
    Blumberga, Andra
    Blumberga, Dagnija
    Bolwig, Simon
    Klitkou, Antje
    Lund, Peter D.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ENVIRONMENTAL AND CLIMATE TECHNOLOGIES, CONECT 2018, 2018, 147 : 503 - 509
  • [36] Greener I, 2017, ENCY BR
  • [37] Apples, oranges, and consistent comparisons of the temporal dynamics of energy transitions
    Grubler, Arnulf
    Wilson, Charlie
    Nemet, Gregory
    [J]. ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2016, 22 : 18 - 25
  • [38] The role of pilot and demonstration plants in technology development and innovation policy
    Hellsmark, Hans
    Frishammar, Johan
    Soderholm, Patrik
    Ylinenpaa, Hakan
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2016, 45 (09) : 1743 - 1761
  • [39] Herbst A., 2012, Swiss J. Econ. Stat, V148, DOI [DOI 10.1007/BF03399363, 10.1007/BF03399363]
  • [40] Hetland P., 1996, EXPLORING HYBRID COM