Review of modelling energy transitions pathways with application to energy system flexibility

被引:97
作者
Bolwig, Simon [1 ]
Bazbauers, Gatis [2 ]
Klitkou, Antje [3 ]
Lund, Peter D. [4 ]
Blumberga, Andra [2 ]
Gravelsins, Armands [2 ]
Blumberga, Dagnija [2 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Engn Management, Prod Torvet 426, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
[2] Riga Tech Univ, Fac Power & Elect Engn, Inst Energy Syst & Environm, Azenes 12-1 St, LV-1048 Riga, Latvia
[3] Nord Inst Studies Innovat Res & Educ, POB 2815 Toyen, NO-0608 Oslo, Norway
[4] Aalto Univ, Sch Sci, POB 15100, FI-00076 Espoo, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Transitions pathways; Socio-technical factors; Sustainable energy systems; Energy system modelling; System dynamics modelling; Energy system flexibility; TEMPORAL DYNAMICS; LOCK-IN; SUSTAINABILITY; TECHNOLOGY; TYPOLOGY; EXPECTATIONS; MECHANISMS; SIMULATION; INNOVATION; ECONOMIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2018.11.019
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The aim of this review is to discuss how quantitative modelling of energy scenarios for sustainable energy transition pathways can be made more realistic by taking into account insights from the socio-technical and related literatures. The proposition is that an enriched modelling approach would focus not just on technology development and deployment, but also on feedback loops, learning processes, policy and governance, behavioural changes, the interlinkages between the energy sector and other economic sectors, and infrastructure development. The review discusses a range of socio-technical concepts with a view to how they can enrich the understanding and modelling of highly complex dynamic systems such as flexible energy systems with high shares of variable renewable energy. In this context, application of system dynamics modelling (SDM) for the analysis of energy transitions is also introduced by describing the differences between SDM and a traditional modelling approach that uses econometric and linear programming methods. A conceptual framework for this type of modelling is provided by using causal loop diagrams. The diagrams illustrate the endogenous approach of SDM - understanding and modelling the structure of a system, which is responsible for its dynamic behaviour. SDM can also capture the co-evolution of economic, policy, technology, and behavioural factors over sufficiently long time periods, which is necessary for the analysis of transition pathway dynamics. In this regard, the review summarises how socio-technical concepts can be approached in SDM and why they are relevant for the analysis of flexibility in energy systems. From a computational point of view, it could be beneficial to combine SDM with technologically detailed energy system optimization models and that could be a way forward for achieving more realistic, non-linear quantitative modelling of sustainable energy transitions.
引用
收藏
页码:440 / 452
页数:13
相关论文
共 76 条
  • [1] An integrated framework for operational flexibility assessment in multi-period power system planning with renewable energy production
    Abdin, Adam F.
    Zio, Enrico
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 222 : 898 - 914
  • [2] Accentuating the renewable energy exploitation: Evaluation of flexibility options
    Alemany, Juan Manuel
    Arendarski, Bartlomiej
    Lombardi, Pio
    Komarnicki, Przemyslaw
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2018, 102 : 131 - 151
  • [3] Households' hourly electricity consumption and peak demand in Denmark
    Andersen, Frits Moller
    Baldini, Mattia
    Hansen, Lars Garn
    Jensen, Carsten Lynge
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 208 : 607 - 619
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2008, MANAGING TRANSITION
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2014, Electr J, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.TEJ.2014.09.011
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2014, World Energy Outlook 2014, DOI [DOI 10.1787/9789264277854-EN, DOI 10.1016/0301-4215(73)90024-4, 10.1787/9789264277854-en]
  • [7] COMPETING TECHNOLOGIES, INCREASING RETURNS, AND LOCK-IN BY HISTORICAL EVENTS
    ARTHUR, WB
    [J]. ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1989, 99 (394) : 116 - 131
  • [8] POSITIVE FEEDBACKS IN THE ECONOMY
    ARTHUR, WB
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, 1990, 262 (02) : 92 - &
  • [9] Energy and complexity: New ways forward
    Bale, Catherine S. E.
    Varga, Liz
    Foxon, Timothy J.
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 138 : 150 - 159
  • [10] System dynamics model of a biotechonomy
    Blumberga, Andra
    Bazbauers, Gatis
    Davidsen, Pal I.
    Blumberga, Dagnija
    Gravelsins, Armands
    Prodanuks, Toms
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 172 : 4018 - 4032