How common are common fragile sites in humans: interindividual variation in the distribution of aphidicolin-induced fragile sites

被引:23
作者
Denison, SR [1 ]
Simper, RK [1 ]
Greenbaum, IF [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Biol, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1159/000073411
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
To obtain an estimate of the variation in common fragile sites (CFSs) among individuals, aphidicolin (APC)-induced chromosomal breakage data were analyzed for 20 karyotypically normal adult humans. As it is specifically designed to meet the analytical requirements for considering fragile sites as presence/absence characters in single individuals, the FSM methodology (Bohm et al., 1995) was used to statistically distinguish fragile from nonfragile sites. These analyses indicated that the APC-induced fragile sites are not ubiquitous but vary extensively among individuals; the per-individual number of fragile sites ranged from as few as seven to as many as 20. Of the 45 different sites identified as fragile, 19 (42%) occurred in more than half of the individuals, but only two sites (3p14 and 16q23) were fragile in all of the individuals; 12 (27% of the total) were fragile in single individuals only. Although these analyses provide statistical confirmation (and initial estimates of population variation) for 43 of the 88 APC-inducible fragile sites currently recognized as occurring among humans, they are consistent with the hypothesis that many of the currently recognized human CFSs have been erroneously identified. These results indicate the need for per-individual statistical identification of CFSs for larger samples of individuals and that studies of particular fragile sites should be conducted on individuals documented to be fragile at the loci under consideration. Copyright (C) 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 16
页数:9
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]   Molecular characterization of FRAXB and comparative common fragile site instability in cancer cells [J].
Arlt, MF ;
Miller, DE ;
Beer, DG ;
Glover, TW .
GENES CHROMOSOMES & CANCER, 2002, 33 (01) :82-92
[2]  
AUSTIN MJF, 1992, AM J HUM GENET, V50, P76
[3]   NONRANDOM DISTRIBUTION OF METHOTREXATE-INDUCED ABERRATIONS ON HUMAN-CHROMOSOMES - DETECTION OF FURTHER FOLIC-ACID SENSITIVE FRAGILE SITES [J].
BARBI, G ;
STEINBACH, P ;
VOGEL, W .
HUMAN GENETICS, 1984, 68 (04) :290-294
[4]  
Bednarek AK, 2000, CANCER RES, V60, P2140
[5]   PHYSICAL MAPPING ACROSS THE FRAGILE-X - HYPERMETHYLATION AND CLINICAL EXPRESSION OF THE FRAGILE-X SYNDROME [J].
BELL, MV ;
HIRST, MC ;
NAKAHORI, Y ;
MACKINNON, RN ;
ROCHE, A ;
FLINT, TJ ;
JACOBS, PA ;
TOMMERUP, N ;
TRANEBJAERG, L ;
FROSTERISKENIUS, U ;
KERR, B ;
TURNER, G ;
LINDENBAUM, RH ;
WINTER, R ;
PEMBREY, M ;
THIBODEAU, S ;
DAVIES, KE .
CELL, 1991, 64 (04) :861-866
[6]  
BOHM U, 1995, HUM GENET, V95, P249, DOI 10.1007/BF00225189
[7]   Characterization of the common fragile site FRA9E and its potential role in ovarian cancer [J].
Callahan, G ;
Denison, SR ;
Phillips, LA ;
Shridhar, V ;
Smith, DI .
ONCOGENE, 2003, 22 (04) :590-601
[8]  
CAPOROSSI D, 1995, HUM GENET, V96, P269
[9]   EXPRESSION OF COMMON FRAGILE SITES IN UNTREATED NON-HODGKINS-LYMPHOMA WITH APHIDICOLIN AND FOLATE-DEFICIENCY [J].
CHARYREDDY, S ;
PRASAD, VS ;
AHUJA, YR .
CANCER LETTERS, 1994, 86 (01) :111-117
[10]   Expression of fragile sites triggers intrachromosomal mammalian gene amplification and sets boundaries to early amplicons [J].
Coquelle, A ;
Pipiras, E ;
Toledo, F ;
Buttin, G ;
Debatisse, M .
CELL, 1997, 89 (02) :215-225