Benefit-Cost Analysis of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Vaccination at the Farm-level in south Vietnam

被引:15
作者
Dinh Bao Truong [1 ,2 ]
Goutard, Flavie Luce [1 ,3 ]
Bertagnoli, Stephane [4 ]
Delabouglise, Alexis [5 ]
Grosbois, Vladimir [1 ]
Peyre, Marisa [1 ]
机构
[1] CIRAD, UMR ASTRE, Montpellier, France
[2] Nong Lam Univ, Fac Anim Sci & Vet Med, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam
[3] Kasetsart Univ, Fac Vet Med, Bangkok, Thailand
[4] Univ Toulouse, IHAP, INRA, ENVT, Toulouse, France
[5] Penn State Univ, Dept Biol, Ctr Infect Dis Dynam, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
animal health economics; benefit-cost analysis; evaluation; financial analysis; foot-and-mouth disease; vaccination; FINANCIAL IMPACT; VIRUS;
D O I
10.3389/fvets.2018.00026
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
This study aimed to analyze the financial impact of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) outbreaks in cattle at the farm-level and the benefit-cost ratio (BCR) of biannual vaccination strategy to prevent and eradicate FMD for cattle in South Vietnam. Production data were collected from 49 small-scale dairy farms, 15 large-scale dairy farms, and 249 beef farms of Long An and Tay Ninh province using a questionaire. Financial data of FMD impacts were collected using participatory tools in 37 villages of Long An province. The net present value, i.e., the difference between the benefits (additional revenue and saved costs) and costs (additional costs and revenue foregone), of FMD vaccination in large-scale dairy farms was 2.8 times higher than in small-scale dairy farms and 20 times higher than in beef farms. The BCR of FMD vaccination over 1 year in large-scale dairy farms, small-scale dairy farms, and beef farms were 11.6 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 6.42-16.45], 9.93 (95% CI 3.45-16.47), and 3.02 (95% CI 0.76-7.19), respectively. The sensitivity analysis showed that varying the vaccination cost had more effect on the BCR of cattle vaccination than varying the market price. This benefit-cost analysis of biannual vaccination strategy showed that investment in FMD prevention can be financially profitable, and therefore sustainable, for dairy farmers. For beef cattle, it is less certain that vaccination is profitable. Additional benefit-cost analysis study of vaccination strategies at the national-level would be required to evaluate and adapt the national strategy to achieve eradication of this disease in Vietnam.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 39 条
[21]  
Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (MARD), 2015, CHUONG TRINH QUOC GI
[22]   Financial Impact of Foot and Mouth Disease on Large Ruminant Smallholder Farmers in the Greater Mekong Subregion [J].
Nampanya, S. ;
Khounsy, S. ;
Phonvisay, A. ;
Young, J. R. ;
Bush, R. D. ;
Windsor, P. A. .
TRANSBOUNDARY AND EMERGING DISEASES, 2015, 62 (05) :555-564
[23]  
Nguyen TT, 2014, TAP CHI KHOA HOC KY, P2
[24]  
OIE FAO, 2012, GLOB FOOT MOUTH DIS
[25]  
OIE Sub-Regional Representation for South East Asia, 2011, SEACFMD 2020 ROADMAP
[26]  
Otte MJ., 2000, Animal Health Economics: an Introduction
[27]   Vaccination against foot-and-mouth disease virus: strategies and effectiveness [J].
Parida, Satya .
EXPERT REVIEW OF VACCINES, 2009, 8 (03) :347-365
[28]  
Phan QM, 2014, 20 M OIE SUBC FMD S
[29]  
Radostits OM, 2011, VET MED TXB DIS CATT
[30]  
Rushton J, 2009, ECONOMICS OF ANIMAL HEALTH AND PRODUCTION, P1