Spatial smoothing of autocorrelations to control the degrees of freedom in fMRI analysis

被引:47
作者
Worsley, KJ
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Math & Stat, Montreal, PQ H3A 2K6, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Montreal Neurol Inst, McConnell Brain Imaging Ctr, Montreal, PQ H3A 2B4, Canada
关键词
fMRI; spatial smoothing; autocorrelations; degrees of freedom;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.007
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
In the statistical analysis of fMRI data, the parameter of primary interest is the effect of a contrast; of secondary interest is its standard error, and of tertiary interest is the standard error of this standard error, or equivalently, the degrees of freedom (df). In a ReML (Restricted Maximum Likelihood) analysis, we show how spatial smoothing of temporal autocorrelations increases the effective df (but not the smoothness of primary or secondary parameter estimates), so that the amount of smoothing can be chosen in advance to achieve a target df, typically 100. This has already been done at the second level of a hierarchical analysis by smoothing the ratio of random to fixed effects variances (Worsley, K.J., Liao, C., Aston, J.A.D., Petre, V., Duncan, G.H., Morales, F., Evans, A.C., 2002. A general statistical analysis for fMRI data. NeuroImage, 15:1-15); we now show how to do it at the first level, by smoothing autocorrelation parameters. The proposed method is extremely fast and it does not require any image processing. It can be used in conjunction with other regularization methods (Gautama, T., Van Hulle, M.M., in press. Optimal spatial regularisation of autocorrelation estimates in fMRI analysis. NeuroImage.) to avoid unnecessary smoothing beyond 100 df. Our results on a typical 6-min, TR = 3, 1.5-T fMRI data set show that 8.5-mm smoothing is needed to achieve 100 df, and this results in roughly a doubling of detected activations. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:635 / 641
页数:7
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   Statistical methods of estimation and inference for functional MR image analysis [J].
Bullmore, E ;
Brammer, M ;
Williams, SCR ;
Rabehesketh, S ;
Janot, N ;
David, A ;
Mellers, J ;
Howard, R ;
Sham, P .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1996, 35 (02) :261-277
[2]   Optimal spatial regularisation of autocorrelation estimates in fMRI analysis [J].
Gautama, T ;
Van Hulle, MM .
NEUROIMAGE, 2004, 23 (03) :1203-1216
[3]   BAYESIAN INFERENCE FOR VARIANCE COMPONENTS USING ONLY ERROR CONTRASTS [J].
HARVILLE, DA .
BIOMETRIKA, 1974, 61 (02) :383-385
[4]   Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood [J].
Kenward, MG ;
Roger, JH .
BIOMETRICS, 1997, 53 (03) :983-997
[5]   A heuristic for the degrees of freedom of statistics based on multiple variance parameters [J].
Kiebel, SJ ;
Glaser, DE ;
Friston, KJ .
NEUROIMAGE, 2003, 20 (01) :591-600
[6]  
Locascio JJ, 1997, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V5, P168, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1997)5:3<168::AID-HBM3>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-1
[8]   On bias in the estimation of autocorrelations for fMRI voxel time-series analysis [J].
Marchini, JL ;
Smith, SM .
NEUROIMAGE, 2003, 18 (01) :83-90
[9]  
McCullagh P., 1983, GEN LINEAR MODELS, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4899-3244-0
[10]   Locally regularized spatiotemporal modeling and model comparison for functional MRI [J].
Purdon, PL ;
Solo, V ;
Weisskoff, RM ;
Brown, EN .
NEUROIMAGE, 2001, 14 (04) :912-923