Orthogonal Higher Order Structure and Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the French Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-III)

被引:53
作者
Golay, Philippe [1 ]
Lecerf, Thierry [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Geneva, FPSE Psychol, Fac Psychol & Educ Sci, CH-1205 Geneva, Switzerland
[2] Univ Lausanne, Inst Psychol, Lausanne, Switzerland
关键词
WAIS-III; Schmid-Leiman transformation; confirmatory factor analysis; CHC theory; INTELLECTUAL ASSESSMENT SCALES; COGNITIVE-ABILITIES; 4TH EDITION; WISC-III; ACHIEVEMENT; CHILDREN; VALIDITY; LATENT; SAMPLE; TESTS;
D O I
10.1037/a0021230
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
According to the most widely accepted Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) model of intelligence measurement, each subtest score of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Adults (3rd ed.; WAIS-III) should reflect both 1st- and 2nd-order factors (i.e., 4 or 5 broad abilities and 1 general factor). To disentangle the contribution of each factor, we applied a Schmid-Leiman orthogonalization transformation (SLT) to the standardization data published in the French technical manual for the WAIS-III. Results showed that the general factor accounted for 63% of the common variance and that the specific contributions of the 1st-order factors were weak (4.7%-15.9%). We also addressed this issue by using confirmatory factor analysis. Results indicated that the bifactor model (with 1st-order group and general factors) better fit the data than did the traditional higher order structure. Models based on the CHC framework were also tested. Results indicated that a higher order CHC model showed a better fit than did the classical 4-factor model; however, the WAIS bifactor structure was the most adequate. We recommend that users do not discount the Full Scale IQ when interpreting the index scores of the WAIS-III because the general factor accounts for the bulk of the common variance in the French WAIS-III. The 4 index scores cannot be considered to reflect only broad ability because they include a strong contribution of the general factor.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 152
页数:10
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Alfonso V.C., 2005, CONT INTELLECTUAL AS, V2nd, P185
[2]  
[Anonymous], PSYCHOMETRIC MONOGRA
[3]   Second-order confirmatory factor analysis of the WAIS-III [J].
Arnau, RC ;
Thompson, B .
ASSESSMENT, 2000, 7 (03) :237-246
[4]  
Byrne B.M., 2001, INT J TEST, V1, P55, DOI [DOI 10.1207/S15327574IJT0101_4, 10.1207/S15327574IJT01014]
[5]   Construct Validity of the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence and Wide Range Intelligence Test: Convergent and Structural Validity [J].
Canivez, Gary L. ;
Konold, Timothy R. ;
Collins, Jason M. ;
Wilson, Greg .
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY, 2009, 24 (04) :252-265
[6]   Orthogonal Higher Order Factor Structure of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales-Fifth Edition for Children and Adolescents [J].
Canivez, Gary L. .
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY, 2008, 23 (04) :533-541
[7]  
Carroll J., 1997, CONT INTELLECTUAL AS, P122
[8]  
Carroll J. B., 1993, Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511571312
[9]   ON METHODOLOGY IN THE STUDY OF COGNITIVE-ABILITIES [J].
CARROLL, JB .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 1995, 30 (03) :429-452
[10]   An Exploratory Investigation of the Factor Structure of the Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scales (RIAS) [J].
Dombrowski, Stefan C. ;
Watkins, Marley W. ;
Brogan, Michael J. .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT, 2009, 27 (06) :494-507