Reliability Evaluation for Aviation Electric Power System in Consideration of Uncertainty

被引:9
作者
Wang, Yao [1 ]
Gao, Xinqin [1 ]
Cai, Yuanfeng [1 ]
Yang, Mingshun [1 ]
Li, Shujuan [1 ]
Li, Yan [1 ]
机构
[1] Xian Univ Technol, Sch Mech & Precis Instrument Engn, Xian 710048, Peoples R China
关键词
aviation electric power system (AEPS); reliability; uncertainty; failure rate; minimal path set; EPISTEMIC UNCERTAINTY; AIRCRAFT;
D O I
10.3390/en13051175
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
With the rapid development of more electric aircraft (MEA) in recent years, the aviation electric power system (AEPS) has played an increasingly important role in safe flight. However, as a highly reliable system, because of its complicated flight conditions and architecture, it often proves significant uncertainty in its failure occurrence and consequence. Thus, more and more stakeholders, e.g., passengers, aviation administration departments, are dissatisfied with the traditional system reliability analysis, in which failure uncertainty is not considered and system reliability probability is a constant value at a given time. To overcome this disadvantage, we propose a new methodology in the AEPS reliability evaluation. First, we perform a random sampling from the probability distributions of components' failure rates and compute the system reliability at each sample point; after that, we use variance, confidence interval, and probability density function to quantify the uncertainty of system reliability. Finally, we perform the new method on a series-parallel system and an AEPS. The results show that the power supply reliability of AEPS is uncertain and the uncertainty varies with system time even though the uncertainty of each component's failure is quite small; therefore it is necessary to quantify system uncertainty for safer flight, and our proposed method could be an effective way to accomplish this quantization task.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, The Monte Carlo Simulation Method for System Reliability and Risk Analysis
[2]  
[Anonymous], P 2016 IEEE INT C CO
[3]  
[Anonymous], P IJCAI 2009 WORKSH
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, P 18 INT WORKSH PRIN
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2014, THESIS
[6]   Reliability comparison of matrix and other converter topologies [J].
Aten, M. ;
Towers, G. ;
Whitley, C. ;
Wheeler, P. ;
Clare, J. ;
Bradley, K. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AEROSPACE AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, 2006, 42 (03) :867-875
[7]   A method for ranking components importance in presence of epistemic uncertainties [J].
Baraldi, P. ;
Zio, E. ;
Compare, M. .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2009, 22 (05) :582-592
[8]  
Bianchi M., 1995, XPLORE INTERACTIVE S, P101, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4612-4214-7_6, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4612-4214-7_6]
[9]  
Blanks H. S., 1990, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, V6, P259, DOI 10.1002/qre.4680060408
[10]  
Bozhko S. V., 2010, IECON 2010 - 36th Annual Conference of IEEE Industrial Electronics, P333, DOI 10.1109/IECON.2010.5675004