Protein-peptide docking: opportunities and challenges

被引:194
作者
Ciemny, Maciej [1 ,2 ]
Kurcinski, Mateusz [1 ]
Kamel, Karol [3 ]
Kolinski, Andrzej [1 ]
Alam, Nawsad [4 ]
Schueler-Furman, Ora [4 ]
Kmiecik, Sebastian [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warsaw, Biol & Chem Res Ctr, Fac Chem, Warsaw, Poland
[2] Univ Warsaw, Fac Phys, Warsaw, Poland
[3] Polish Acad Sci, Inst Bioorgan Chem, Poznan, Poland
[4] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Inst Med Res Israel Canada, Dept Microbiol & Mol Genet, Fac Med, Jerusalem, Israel
关键词
STRUCTURE-BASED DESIGN; WEB SERVER; BINDING-SITES; ROSETTA FLEXPEPDOCK; MOLECULAR DOCKING; FLEXIBLE DOCKING; PREDICTION; BLIND; REFINEMENT; LIGANDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.drudis.2018.05.006
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Peptides have recently attracted much attention as promising drug candidates. Rational design of peptide-derived therapeutics usually requires structural characterization of the underlying protein peptide interaction. Given that experimental characterization can be difficult, reliable computational tools are needed. In recent years, a variety of approaches have been developed for 'protein-peptide docking', that is, predicting the structure of the protein-peptide complex, starting from the protein structure and the peptide sequence, including variable degrees of information about the peptide binding site and/or conformation. In this review, we provide an overview of protein-peptide docking methods and outline their capabilities, limitations, and applications in structure-based drug design. Key challenges are also briefly discussed, such as modeling of large-scale conformational changes upon binding, scoring of predicted models, and optimal inclusion of varied types of experimental data and theoretical predictions into an integrative modeling process.
引用
收藏
页码:1530 / 1537
页数:8
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   High-resolution global peptide-protein docking using fragments-based PIPER-FlexPepDock [J].
Alam, Nawsad ;
Goldstein, Oriel ;
Xia, Bing ;
Porter, Kathryn A. ;
Kozakov, Dima ;
Schueler-Furman, Ora .
PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2017, 13 (12)
[2]  
Alam N, 2017, METHODS MOL BIOL, V1561, P139, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-6798-8_9
[3]   DynaDock: A new molecular dynamics-based algorithm for protein-peptide docking including receptor flexibility [J].
Antes, Iris .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2010, 78 (05) :1084-1104
[4]  
Antunes D. A., 2017, CANCER RES, P55
[5]   Understanding the challenges of protein flexibility in drug design [J].
Antunes, Dinler A. ;
Devaurs, Didier ;
Kavraki, Lydia E. .
EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG DISCOVERY, 2015, 10 (12) :1301-1313
[6]   AnchorDock: Blind and Flexible Anchor-Driven Peptide Docking [J].
Ben-Shimon, Avraham ;
Niv, Masha Y. .
STRUCTURE, 2015, 23 (05) :929-940
[7]   Computational Mapping of Anchoring Spots on Protein Surfaces [J].
Ben-Shimon, Avraham ;
Eisenstein, Miriam .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2010, 402 (01) :259-277
[8]   Interfering peptides targeting protein-protein interactions: the next generation of drugs? [J].
Bruzzoni-Giovanelli, Heriberto ;
Alezra, Valerie ;
Wolff, Nicolas ;
Dong, Chang-Zhi ;
Tuffery, Pierre ;
Rebollo, Angelita .
DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY, 2018, 23 (02) :272-285
[9]   Protein Flexibility in Drug Discovery: From Theory to Computation [J].
Buonfiglio, Rosa ;
Recanatini, Maurizio ;
Masetti, Matteo .
CHEMMEDCHEM, 2015, 10 (07) :1141-1148
[10]   Structure-based design and confirmation of peptide ligands for neuronal polo-like kinase to promote neuroregeneration [J].
Cao, He-Li ;
Chen, Hao ;
Cui, Yu-Hui ;
Tian, Heng-Li ;
Chen, Jiong .
COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2016, 61 :238-244