Challenges in the design, planning and implementation of trials evaluating group interventions

被引:38
作者
Biggs, Katie [1 ]
Hind, Daniel [1 ]
Gossage-Worrall, Rebecca [1 ]
Sprange, Kirsty [2 ]
White, David [1 ]
Wright, Jessica [1 ]
Chatters, Robin [1 ]
Berry, Katherine [3 ]
Papaioannou, Diana [1 ]
Bradburn, Mike [1 ]
Walters, Stephen J. [1 ]
Cooper, Cindy [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Sch Hlth & Related Res ScHARR, 30 Regent St, Sheffield S1 4DA, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Nottingham, NCTU, Nottingham, England
[3] Univ Manchester, Sch Hlth Sci, Manchester, Lancs, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Group interventions; Therapy groups; Treatment fidelity; Implementation; Intervention design; Clinical trials; COGNITIVE-BEHAVIORAL THERAPY; CLINICAL-TRIALS; PARTICIPANT RECRUITMENT; COMPLEX INTERVENTIONS; PSYCHOTHERAPY GROUPS; INDIVIDUAL THERAPY; PATIENT SELECTION; PERCEPTIONS; ATTRITION; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1186/s13063-019-3807-4
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background Group interventions are interventions delivered to groups of people rather than to individuals and are used in healthcare for mental health recovery, behaviour change, peer support, self-management and/or health education. Evaluating group interventions in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) presents trialists with a set of practical problems, which are not present in RCTs of one-to-one interventions and which may not be immediately obvious. Methods Case-based approach summarising Sheffield trials unit's experience in the design and implementation of five group interventions. We reviewed participant recruitment and attrition, facilitator training and attrition, attendance at the group sessions, group size and fidelity aspects across five RCTs. Results Median recruitment across the five trials was 3.2 (range 1.7-21.0) participants per site per month. Group intervention trials involve a delay in starting the intervention for some participants, until sufficient numbers are available to start a group. There was no evidence that the timing of consent, relative to randomisation, affected post-randomisation attrition which was a matter of concern for all trial teams. Group facilitator attrition was common in studies where facilitators were employed by the health system rather than the by the grant holder and led to the early closure of one trial; research sites responded by training 'back-up' and new facilitators. Trials specified that participants had to attend a median of 62.5% (range 16.7%-80%) of sessions, in order to receive a 'therapeutic dose'; a median of 76.7% (range 42.9%-97.8%) received a therapeutic dose. Across the five trials, 75.3% of all sessions went ahead without the pre-specified ideal group size. A variety of methods were used to assess the fidelity of group interventions at a group and individual level across the five trials. Conclusion This is the first paper to provide an empirical basis for planning group intervention trials. Investigators should expect delays/difficulties in recruiting groups of the optimal size, plan for both facilitator and participant attrition, and consider how group attendance and group size affects treatment fidelity.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]   SMALL AND UNFILLED PSYCHOTHERAPY GROUPS - UNDERSTANDING AND USING THEM EFFECTIVELY [J].
ANDERSON, TI .
GROUP, 1993, 17 (01) :13-20
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, DESIGN ANAL REPORT C
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, DEV EVALUATING COMPL
[4]   Group cognitive-behavioural therapy for schizophrenia - Randomised controlled trial [J].
Barrowclough, Christine ;
Haddock, Gillian ;
Lobban, Fiona ;
Jones, Steve ;
Siddle, Ron ;
Roberts, Chris ;
Gregg, Lynsey .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2006, 189 :527-532
[5]   Cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia: Comparison of individual therapy, group therapy, and telephone consultations [J].
Bastien, CH ;
Morin, CM ;
Ouellet, MC ;
Blais, FC ;
Bouchard, S .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 72 (04) :653-659
[6]   Enhancing treatment fidelity in health behavior change studies: Best practices and recommendations from the NIH behavior change consortium [J].
Bellg, AJ ;
Borrelli, B ;
Resnick, B ;
Hecht, J ;
Minicucci, DS ;
Ory, M ;
Ogedegbe, G ;
Orwig, D ;
Ernst, D ;
Czajkowski, S .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 23 (05) :443-451
[7]   Multiples and parents of multiples prefer same arm randomization of siblings in neonatal trials [J].
Bernardo, J. ;
Nowacki, A. ;
Martin, R. ;
Fanaroff, J. M. ;
Hibbs, A. M. .
JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2015, 35 (03) :208-213
[8]   POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE NORM REGULATION AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP TO THERAPY GROUP-SIZE [J].
BOND, GR .
GROUP, 1984, 8 (02) :35-44
[9]   Identifying change processes in group-based health behaviour-change interventions: development of the mechanisms of action in group-based interventions (MAGI) framework [J].
Borek, Aleksandra J. ;
Abraham, Charles ;
Greaves, Colin J. ;
Gillison, Fiona ;
Tarrant, Mark ;
Morgan-Trimmer, Sarah ;
McCabe, Rose ;
Smith, Jane R. .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2019, 13 (03) :227-247
[10]   How do Small Groups Promote Behaviour Change? An Integrative Conceptual Review of Explanatory Mechanisms [J].
Borek, Aleksandra J. ;
Abraham, Charles .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-HEALTH AND WELL BEING, 2018, 10 (01) :30-61