Risk assessment in straw-based power generation public-private partnership projects in China: A fuzzy synthetic evaluation analysis

被引:93
|
作者
Wu, Yunna [1 ,2 ]
Li, Lingwenying [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Ruhang [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Kaifeng [1 ,2 ]
Hu, Yong [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Xiaoshan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] North China Elect Power Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] North China Elect Power Univ, Beijing Key Lab New Energy & Low Carbon Dev, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
关键词
PPP mode; Straw-based power generation; Risk assessment; Fuzzy synthetic evaluation; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; SUPPLY CHAIN; INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; ENERGY PROJECTS; PPP PROJECTS; ALLOCATION; MALAYSIA; SUCCESS; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.008
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
With the increasing requirement on energy saving, emission reduction and environmental protection in China, the straw-based power generation is developing rapidly, which can not only provide clean energy, but also address the serious environmental problems caused by farmers' burning straw directly. Currently, the government is gradually applying Public-Private-Partnership model to this field making use of private sectors' capital and technological advantages. To assess the risks in public-private partnership straw-based power generation projects in China, 44 risk factors were identified and 19 critical risks factors (CRFs) were selected and classified into 4 groups (CRGs) based on a questionnaire survey in this paper. Then, the likelihood of occurrence (LO), magnitude of impact (MI), the integrated risk level (IRL) of each CRF, CRG and the overall risk were calculated through the fuzzy synthetic evaluation method. The CRF "government invention" was the most critical risk factor and the CRG "project participant risk" was the most critical risk factor group. Overall, the final fuzzy synthesis result indicated that the IRL of the public-private partnership straw-based power generation projects in China was high. Finally, some recommendations were given for each CRF. The evaluation index system, the multi-criteria fuzzy synthetic evaluation framework, the obtained conclusions and the risk response measures in this paper can help policy makers and project decision makers make appropriate decisions and allocate the limited resources to the risks worthy more attention. Simultaneously, this paper can provide a reference for the private sector to avoid too risky project and at the same time facilitate the public sector to take effective measures reducing project risks so as to attract more high-quality private capital. In addition, the risk assessment in public-private partnership straw-based power generation projects has not been discussed and paid enough attention yet. Thus, this study expands the knowledge and contributes to the literature. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:977 / 990
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A bibliometric and meta-analysis of studies on public-private partnership in China
    Pu, Wang
    Xu, Fei
    Marques, Rui Cunha
    CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2021, 39 (09) : 773 - 789
  • [42] Risk Analysis of Public-Private Partnership Waste-to-Energy Incineration Projects from the Perspective of Rural Revitalization
    Cao, Guoxian
    Guo, Chaoyang
    Li, Hezhong
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (13)
  • [43] An analysis of the delivery challenges influencing public-private partnership in housing projects: The case of Tanzania
    Kavishe, Neema
    Jefferson, Ian
    Chileshe, Nicholas
    ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECTURAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 25 (02) : 202 - 240
  • [44] Effect of promotion pressure and financial burden on investment in public-private partnership infrastructure projects in China
    Wang, Ling
    Zhou, Lihong
    Xiong, Yan
    Yan, Dongyi
    ASIAN-PACIFIC ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 2019, 33 (02) : 128 - 142
  • [45] Critical Risk Factors of Transnational Public-Private Partnership Projects: Literature Review
    Yu, Yao
    Chan, Albert P. C.
    Chen, Chuan
    Darko, Amos
    JOURNAL OF INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS, 2018, 24 (01)
  • [46] Identification of Critical Success and Risk Factors for Public-Private Partnership Highway Projects
    Fathi, Medya
    Shrestha, Pramen P.
    JOURNAL OF LEGAL AFFAIRS AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 15 (01)
  • [47] Rethinking Risk Propagation Mechanism in Public-Private Partnership Projects: Network Perspective
    Zhang, Yating
    Tsai, Chung-Han
    Liao, Pin-Chao
    JOURNAL OF INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS, 2020, 26 (02)
  • [48] Identifying Measures of Effective Risk Management for Public-Private Partnership Infrastructure Projects in Developing Countries
    Mazher, Khwaja Mateen
    Chan, Albert P. C.
    Choudhry, Rafiq M.
    Zahoor, Hafiz
    Edwards, David J.
    Ghaithan, Ahmed M.
    Mohammed, Awsan
    Aziz, Mubashir
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (21)
  • [49] Risk Cost Measurement of Value for Money Evaluation Based on Case-Based Reasoning and Ontology: A Case Study of the Urban Rail Transit Public-Private Partnership Projects in China
    Wang, Hongqiang
    Lin, Qiaoyan
    Zhang, Yingjie
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (09)
  • [50] Performance Evaluation of Public-private Partnership in Infrastructure Development in China: An Overview
    Chu, Chenglong
    Zhang, Zhihui
    Liao, Mingjun
    2015 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (ICEEP 2015), 2015, : 2111 - 2117